Insider Attack Essay

1536 Words4 Pages

September 11, 2001, nineteen men hijacked four fuel-loaded US commercial airplanes bound for west coast destinations. 2,996 people were killed. Less than a month after, U.S. troops invaded Afghanistan in an attempt to dismantle, al-Qaeda. Two years later, the United States invaded Iraq and deposed of President Saddam Hussein. Our military involvement in Afghanistan turned into the longest-running war in U.S. history. With all these costs, many questions followed. Before any forensic proof, the term “Arab Terrorists” was applied throughout the news as those at fault. Soon, people started asking for more information. People wanted to know why independent inquiry was being block, who was blocking it, and why it was being blocked. All evidence at the scenes was removed and destroyed. These question still haven’t been …show more content…

So, the SEC had undertaken the unprecedented action of deputizing hundreds of private officials in its investigation. Michael Ruppert, a former LAPD officer, explained the reasoning of this action. “What happens when you deputize someone in a national security or criminal investigation is that you make it illegal for them to disclose publicly what they know. Smart move. In effect, they become government agents and are controlled by government regulations rather than their own conscience. In fact, they can be thrown in jail without a hearing if they talk publicly.” The government had effectively silenced everyone who seemed important. The numbers clearly showed a few investors knew about the attacks before they happened. CBS said eight days after the attack, “insider trading is always motivated by greed, and a senior Wall Street executive noted it would be ironic if the terrorists' greed ended up providing one of the most promising leads investigators

Open Document