1984 Censorship Essay

1310 Words3 Pages

Since the dawn of society, a higher power has always taken place to keep everything in order. To keep order, rules, and regulations have been placed for the majority to remain obedient. Some try to maintain human rights, while others haven’t. One of these rights is free speech, the allowance of people to express any idea, thought, or whatever is on their mind to whoever, wherever, and whenever. Other governments or higher powers do not approve of this right and do whatever to suppress or censor this ability to spread thought and ideas. An example of this type of government is in the book 1984 by George Orwell, with its rather cruel and highly controlling method of censorship. In the modern world, controlling governments like this exist, with …show more content…

As mentioned before, 1984 has a heavily controlled society that heavily restricts any freedom of thought, in fact, any thought that is not in line with what the Party wants you to think. The Party uses multiple methods to censor any free thought, with 2 examples: Newspeak and O’Brien brainwashing Winston. Newspeak is the new language the Party is trying to create to essentially get rid of and replace certain words in the English language. The reason that they are doing this is because people can’t think about and spread an idea that may go against their ideology because they literally cannot think about anything against it due to a lack of vocabulary. The narrator describes Newspeak, saying “From where Winston stood it was just possible to read, picked out on its white face in elegant lettering, the three slogans of the Party: WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.” (Orwell 6). The words are very simple and are exactly what The Party wants to have people ingrained in their minds, with them having nothing else to think …show more content…

The policy states that the use of free speech will be prohibited if used harmfully. Since this student posted what he wanted, yet offended the principal, is this ok to censor? According to the U.S. Supreme Court, it is not as “the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 2021 case that unless a student’s off-campus expression “causes a substantial disruption at school, the job of policing their speech falls to parents, not the government,” and “courts must be more skeptical of a school’s efforts to regulate off-campus speech, for doing so may mean the student cannot engage in that kind of speech at all.” (Latham). This case ends in favor of the student winning the lawsuit, and all punishment withdrawn. The verdict ending in the student's favor is the right call, as the student freely expressed what was on his mind about the principle, posting it in meme form. It was not a dangerous abuse of free speech, even though it was against school policy and offensive to the

Open Document