Kant's Enlightenment In An Age Of Enlightenment

1036 Words3 Pages

As Kant would put it, “Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-imposed immaturity” (Kant 1784, p. 1). However, what does this truly mean? Kant says that this said immaturity is not due to man’s lack of understanding, but rather man’s lack of courage and confidence to use his understanding willingly and without the direction of others. In other words, Enlightenment to Kant is to resist authority and traditions, allowing us to think for ourselves. “’Have courage to use your own understanding!’—that is the motto of enlightenment” (Kant 1784, p. 1). Furthermore, enlightenment cannot be achieved overnight. It would be foolish to say otherwise. As a person grows slowly yet surely out of this self-imposed condition of immaturity is when one
I would say no. Mankind feels no reason to rebel. With so much wrong in the world, nothing is often done to stop it. “Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why so great a proportion of men, long after nature has released them from alien guidance, naturaliter maiorennes (age of majority by nature), nonetheless gladly remain in lifelong immaturity, and why it is so easy for others to establish themselves as their guardians. It is so easy to be immature” (Kant 1784, p. 1). Laziness simply fits in within human nature a tad too well. The idea of laziness, unfortunately, allows people to feel like they are in a state of peace and comfortability with no need to “think outside the box” or rebel for what is right. “It is because of laziness and cowardice that so great a part of humankind (…) gladly remains minors for life (…). It is so comfortable to be a minor!” (Kant 1784, p.
In a free country such as our own, scholars can be met with opposition and backlash when expressing their thoughts. However, isn’t this with Kant wanted us to do? It can definitely be said that Kant’s vision for a free-thinking society where scholars are not prosecuted is still not in place today. Scholars in any field of thinking present facts, evidence, and reason to issues like global warming and climate change. Many scholars even go as far as to offer a valid solution to many of our serious issues at hand, yet they are simply pushed to the side, often because of financial gains for others in power. Even in countries outside of our own, which may not be considered a one with freedom, the act of questioning and thinking is silenced and even punished. As generations move on, who will truly think for themselves and act on their own understanding when so many previous generations have been conditioned to be silent? Full human potential cannot be reached if enlightenment is not pursued. Moving forward, the question remains…what makes Kant’s theory of enlightenment humanistic? Humanism is defined as a concern with the nature, capacity and potential of humanity, and the development and promotion of the same. Kant did not reject our normal, moral judgements. Rather, he devised a new method; one that would allow man to take the right action by thinking – something that people who call themselves “humanists”

Open Document