End of Semester Essay Questions

1499 Words3 Pages

1. Compare and Contrast the Army Problem Solving Model Process with the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process. (C100)

The Army’s Problem solving model is a seven-step process where leaders take a systematic approach to define a problem, develop possible solutions to solve the problem, arrive at the best solution, and implement the solution. This process will identify the problem, gather information, develop criteria, develop possible solutions, analyze the possible solutions, compare them, and finally implement the best decision. Once you solve the problem, this process ends. The sequence of the seven steps is crucial to the success of solving the problem.

The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process (RDSP) is a decision-making and synchronization technique that commanders and staff commonly use during execution. There are five steps in the RDSP. They include comparing the current situation to the order, determining that a decision, and what type of decision is required to develop, refine, validate the Course of Action, and implement it. Of the five steps, you have the option to perform the first two steps in any order or concurrently. The goal is timely, effective solutions; the best solution is not necessary. Unit staff sections use this technique to support an existing order from the commander.

What are the similarities between The Army Problem Solving Model Process and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process? There are several similarities between the two. Leaders combine their experience and intuition with situational awareness to reach the situational understanding. Even though both have a different number of steps to reach a decision, a decision presents itself using a...

... middle of paper ...

...ons for the future.

As I compare and contrast the QDR and General Casey’s objectives, I found the best way to accomplish this was to combine them together. Although written in different languages the comparisons were the same. There were several ways that the compared to one another. Both wanted to save the taxpayers’ money over the long haul. Preserve and enhance the All-Volunteer Force as well as civilians and families. Continue efforts to rebalance the capabilities of the Armed Forces. Continue to increase the capacity of the SOF, assess, and establish the SOF and enabler mix. Establish an ISR Center of excellence and a resilient network for cyber defense. Improve how we care for our wounded warriors and how they transition from the military. Re-engineer how we buy and examine the business process we use to determine efficiency and effectiveness.

Open Document