Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Netherlands influence in Indonesia
The Dutch colonisation of Indonesia
The Dutch colonisation of Indonesia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Netherlands influence in Indonesia
VOC and EIC were the first important trading companies that seemed to have opened up trading activities in the present history . VOC stepped up efforts to improve its position in different fronts. After the company was awarded both colonial activities and monopoly on trade in the entire region, the Dutch parliament was clear about their intention. VOC strived to control all territories in Java by conquering Jakarta . During the time, it was involved in the internal politics of Java and could organize operatives to facilitate its pursuit. Even though it was using Portuguese strategies such as brutality, aspirations and courage, it managed to bring better organizations, strong financial backing, ships, and weapons. However, the company failed in its quest to control spice trade in Indonesia (Boxer 1979, p. 742). VOC factionalized nearly all kingdoms in Java making it possible to establish unimaginable foothold in the region. This helped Java region develop into land based colonial empire. This made the kingdom one of the richest colonial possessions in the global history (Tirthankar 2012, p. 34).
In 1800, VOC became bankrupt, compelling the Dutch parliament to dissolve it (Ricklefs 1993, p. 23). This gave room for Dutch government to take over the company’s possessions six years after the dissolution. Following the crushing of Javanese uprising in Java war of 1825-30 , both indentured labor, and forced cultivation system was introduced. Due to this, both Indonesians and Dutch were brought together to support the cultivation system and created enormous wealth. Fortunately, the system tied peasants to their lands, forcing the government to enforce certain policies. For instance, the peasants were compelled to use 60 days of a year ...
... middle of paper ...
...OC could not overcome (Tirthankar 2012).
Works Cited
Boxer, C.R. “The Dutch East India Company and the China Trade” History Today 29, no. 11(1979): 741-50. Accessed October 26, 2013. Master FILE Premier, EBSCOhost.
Colley, Linda. Captives; “Britain, Empire and the World 1600- 1850.” Anchor, 2003.
Prakash, Om. “East India Company, British.” History of World Trade since 1450, ed. John J. McCusker 1. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA. 2006, pp. 201-204. Accessed October 15, 2013 via World History In Context.
Ricklefs, M.C. A History of Modern Indonesia Since c. 1300, second edition. London: MacMillan, 1993.
Robins, Nick. “The Corporation That Changed the World” How the East India Company changed the modern multinational. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012.
Tirthankar, Roy. The East India Company the Worlds Most Powerful Corporation. New York: Penguin Group, 2012.
Bentley, J., & Ziegler, H. (2008). Trade and encounters a global perspective on the past. (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 182-401). New York: McGraw-Hill.
The development and prosperity of 17th century expansion created a system that accumulated a vast amount of wealth at the expense of others. During the 17th century many nations started to participate in long distance trades, which introduced a great deal of new possibilities, exciting forms of transcultural exchange, and unprecedented circulation of goods and ideas. In Vermeer’s Hat, by Timothy Brook he explores the origins of world trade in the 17th century through the painting of Johannes Vermeer. By analyzing Vermeer’s painting, Brook illustrates the world of 17th century global trade and examines the phenomena of globalization. For instance, Brook states that, “The seventeenth century was not so much an era of first contacts as an age
Royally chartered companies monopolized international trade in the early days of the English empire. The monopolies were an effort to control the high economic risks of maritime shipping and multi-year voyages by restricting the supply of goods to maintain high prices and incentive the development of trade. Merchants banded together in joint stock companies to pool the risk and engage in capital intensive enterprises, such as the slave trade. Queen Elizabeth chartered the British East India Company (EIC) in 1600 to establish trade with Asia. Its charter granted the company a “monopoly on all English trade to the east of the Cape of the Good Hope,” a legally enforceable trade agreement that covered territory stretching from the east coast of Africa to the west coast of North America. The company’s first “factory” (trading station) in India was established at Masulipatnam in 1611. Charles II chartered The Royal African Company in 1672 to develop the English slave trade in Africa. He granted it a monopoly on the trade of slaves from Africa to the colonies and provided a robust legal framework with which to enforce
In case of new age Indian businesses this is even more true. Businesses are now fixated on being the next Unicorn, a mythical animal, whose name is also given to companies who are valued at a billion dollars before going public. Unicorns or not, their ambition now presumably is to attract the nth round of funding and access the seemingly endless yet slowly drying supply of dollars to survive in the present with a wishful thinking to dominate the future. The Unicorn here lives the narrative of ‘go big or go home’. And in most cases it represents the glorified ambitions of one-upmanship, market domination being the trophy investment.
If there was ever an important period historians, and people could put a finger on, this would be it. This is the important period where the world’s countries, kingdoms, and dynasties established trade routes. This is the period where countries were made and countries were destroyed because of the importance of trade and the importance of building a fundamental, religious, and economical way of life. This paper will discuss the goals and functions of trades, and traders, and a historical analysis of world trade. This paper will also get into world trade patterns, of The Americas, Sub-Saharan Africa, The Indian Ocean, The Silk routes, China and The South China Sea, Europe and The Mediterranean, and The Atlantic Exploration.
Greenberg, Michael. British Trade and the Opening of China 1800 - 42. New York: Monthly Review, 1979. Print.
Looking back into history can aid in understanding the present. "The British East India Company was a privately owned company which was established to create profitable trade with countries in the region of Asia called the "East Indies"(Wild). The British East India Company was arguably the largest corporation
Britain, a strong nation, demanded more influence over the economic, political, and social lives of the Indian people. They were determined to shape the economy of India, to benefit European economies. Britain also wanted the people to adopt their customs. Initially, the British government controlled the East India Company’s efforts in both India and London. Up until the start of the nineteenth century, the East India Company governed India with very little intrusion from the British government. The company had its own army, which was headed by British officers and the staff was made up of sepoys, which were Indian soldiers. The British East India Company management represented Britain in India.
to 1750 C.E., the people involved in Indian Ocean commerce changed. The Umayyad dynasty arose in 661 C.E. and was replaced by the Abbasid Dynasty in 750; the merchants from these dynasties participated in Indian Ocean trade using naval technology borrowed from other places. By 670 C.E., the Southeast Asian kingdom of Srivijaya had begun, and they controlled trade in Southeast Asia with the navy they built. The Srivijaya prospered from their involvement in trade, but were surpassed by the south Indian kingdom of Chola. The Srivijaya kingdom was followed by three more kingdoms, each of which also participated in Indian Ocean trade. The Ming Dynasty (established in 1368 C.E.) paid for seven naval expeditions, led by Zheng He, to establish the Chinese in Indian Ocean trade; Zheng He’s expeditions used treasure ships, which were very large and impressive. These expeditions ended in 1433 after the Ming government ceased sponsoring them. In the late 1400s, Bartolomeu Dias, a Portuguese sailor, arrived at an Indian sea port and in the next century, the Portuguese prevailed in trade between Asia and Europe; this marked the start of European control in Asia. The Europeans became involved in Indian Ocean trade because they desired to find a route around the Islamic Empires of Southwest Asia, who they considered the “middleman”. Government sponsorships, good naval technology, and a supply of resources and commodities allowed states to participate in and receive profit from Indian Ocean trade; they also allowed certain regions to dominate and control Indian Ocean commerce. Hence, the people involved in and dominating Indian Ocean trade varied over
Naquin, S., & Rawkin, E. S. (1987). Chinese Society in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press.
Booker, M. Keith. Colonial Power, Colonial Texts: India in the Modern British Novel. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1997.
Karp, J. (1996). Food for Politics: McDonald’s Opens in India’s Prickly Market. Far Eastern Economic Review. pp.72.
I will first illustrate Headrick’s argument on how the innovations of the British — that is to say, their use of bringing economic and technological ideas to India to benefit their empire — gave the British the illusion of imperial stability. The author asserts the importance of how the British did not harm the Indians when they brought their technological influences to the area. In the beginning of his article, Headrick states how the British left the Indians’ underlying social structures and customs untouched when they brought over industri...
Blake, L. J. (2014, 1 1). STARBUCKS AS LATEMOVER? THE STRATEGY BEHIND STARBUCKS’ ENTRY IN INDIA. Retrieved 8 10, 2015, from //.web.a.ebscohost.com: http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=3&sid=504e8688-b3ed-443f-98ef-c8afa53837e7%40sessionmgr4001&hid=4101
The progression and evolution of international business has played an integral role in the overall development and progress of the world economy, culture, and politics. The multinational corporation was an essential part of this process and has roots as far back as the 15th and 16th centuries in Western Europe, specifically in the nations of England and Holland, during a period known as mercantilism. This was a time of unprecedented global exploration, colonization, and other imperialist ventures. Organizations such as the British East India Trading Company, promoted both global trade and the acquisition of natural resources, primarily for their home countries in areas including Africa, East Asia, and the Americas. Global trade was the primary factor in the growth of the world economy during this time. However the modern MNC, as it is known today, did not appear until the 19th century. These new entities provided a new level of inter-firm connectedness, a wider division of labor, and a higher level of product integration across countries in which MNCs are growing. Studies have shown that modern MNCs are characterized by a high degree of complexity, and have not followed a linear pattern in their development. In addition, it is crucial to understand the geographical context in which these MNCs were founded. This paper will analyze the development of the multinational corporation (MNC) from the 1870s to the modern day and examine it what ways, and to what degree it has changed over time.