Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crimes solved by dna
DNA Sets You Free
In America, you are guilty unless proven innocent. There have been people who have been falsely accused and convicted of heinous crimes they did not commit before DNA was discovered. One movie called Conviction is based on a true story how DNA proved a man’s innocence for a heinous crime. There is statistics and facts of how people were convicted for crimes they did not commit before DNA was discovered. Officials use DNA for their databases to identify people; investigators use DNA to solve crimes. In the movie Conviction the use of DNA is the key to justice, and this demonstrates that suspects should submit DNA into the database system, so that law enforcement and lawyers could use this to convict or release the individuals.
The movie Conviction, takes place in 1983. The main character, Betty Ann Walters is a working Massachusetts high school dropout. She has a short-tempered older brother named Kenny (Rainer, 2010). Kenny received a life sentence for a murder charge he did not commit. For the next 18 years, Betty went back to school to receive her GED then dedicated her life to law school to figure out a way to set her brother free. However, she sacrificed her marriage, lost her two children, and does not have a single regret for what she had done (Rainer, 2010). One day Betty stumbles across one single faint possible chance that would set her brother free: which was comparing Kenny’s DNA with the murder weapon. If Kenny’s DNA did not match the DNA that was on the murder weapon, he would be set free. Betty tried the strategy, which concluded on her proving and winning the case of her brother’s innocence. The court then paid Kenny $1 million for the pain-and-suffering.
There are some people in society, like K...
... middle of paper ...
...on from going to prison. You are guilty unless proven innocent, in other words the truth behind DNA results may set you free.
References
Bourgoin, S. (1998). Encyclopedia of World Biography. Detroit, MI: Gale group.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2003). DNA examinations. Handbook of Forensic Services. p. 33. Retrieved from Criminal Justice Collection database.
Innocence Project. (n.d.). DNA Exonerations Nationwide. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/DNA_Exonerations_Nationwide.php
Rainer, P. (2010). “Conviction: movie review.” Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from Criminal Justice Collection database.
The United States Department of Justice. (n.d.).Advancing justice through DNA technology: Using DNA to solve crimes. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/ag/dnapolicybook_solve_crimes.htm
As we learned this week, DNA databases are used by various governmental agencies for several different purposes. We all have seen new magazine shows such as, 20/20 or Dateline, that show the collection of DNA samples from suspects in a case that is compared to those collected at the scene of the crime. But what happens when the sample is an incomplete match, compromised, or contaminated? The answer is the wrongful conviction of innocent citizens. The case that I have decided to highlight, is the wrongful conviction of Herman Atkins. In 1986, Atkins was convicted of two counts of forcible rape, two counts of oral copulation, and robbery in the state of California. It was alleged that Herman entered a shoe store, and raped, beat, and robbed a
Throughout the trial, there were multiple points in which Bibbins had false accusations thrown against him from the victim and the law enforcement of Baton Rouge. The victim clearly misidentifies her rapist and clearly is distraught while identifying, "The victim's initial description of the attacker was a man with long and curly hair, wearing jeans. Bibbins was wearing grey shorts and had short, cropped hair at the time" (Innocent Project). As with false accusations there were multiple occasions in which evidence proving Bibbins innocence were not present during the trial. Baton Rouge police had discarded evidence from the crime, "The allegations of evidence tampering gained credibility in 2003 when DNA testing unavailable at the time of Bibbins' trial excluded him as the girl's rapist" (Sherrer). Eventually Bibbins is able to use this information of evidence tampering to help strengthen his case against the city of Baton
In certain situations, it is necessary to identify DNA retreived from a sample. When there is a
“DNA Testing and the Death Penalty.” ACLU: American Civil Liberties Union. 3 Oct. 2011. Web. 22 April 2014.
Mathews, TomMcGuire, Stryker. " Looking Past The Verdict. (Cover Story). " Newsweek 121.17 (1993): 20.
Nowadays, DNA is a crucial component of a crime scene investigation, used to both to identify perpetrators from crime scenes and to determine a suspect’s guilt or innocence (Butler, 2005). The method of constructing a distinctive “fingerprint” from an individual’s DNA was first described by Alec Jeffreys in 1985. He discovered regions of repetitions of nucleotides inherent in DNA strands that differed from person to person (now known as variable number of tandem repeats, or VNTRs), and developed a technique to adjust the length variation into a definitive identity marker (Butler, 2005). Since then, DNA fingerprinting has been refined to be an indispensible source of evidence, expanded into multiple methods befitting different types of DNA samples. One of the more controversial practices of DNA forensics is familial DNA searching, which takes partial, rather than exact, matches between crime scene DNA and DNA stored in a public database as possible leads for further examination and information about the suspect. Using familial DNA searching for investigative purposes is a reliable and advantageous method to convict criminals.
Convicting the Innocent: A Critique of the Theories of Wrongful Convictions. Criminal Law Forum, 20(2/3), 173-192. Crime in the United States. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/ Friedman, S. (2014, March 10).
Easteal, McCleod, and Reed. DNA Profiling: Principles, Pitfalls and Potential. Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1991.
Criminal Law declares what conduct is illegal and proscribes a penalty. Although, we rely on our court system to administer justice, sometimes the innocent are convicted (Risinger). Most people would not be able to imagine a person who is convicted of a crime as innocent, sometimes that is the case. Imagine what a variance that is: an innocent criminal. In an article by Radley Balko he asks the question, “How many more are innocent?” In his article, he questions America’s 250th DNA exoneration and states that it raises questions about how often we send the wrong person to prison. The other issue that follows is the means of appealing the court’s decision and who they can turn to for help.
Office of the Inspector General. (2010). Review of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory’s Forensic DNA Case Backlog. U.S. Department of Justice.
"Using DNA to Solve Crimes." U.S. Department of Justice: National Institute of Justice. (September 9, 2014). Web. 29 May 2015.
Garrett, Brandon. Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2011. 86. Print.
Singer, Julie A. "The Impact Of Dna And Other Technology On The Criminal Justice System: Improvements And Complications."Albany Law Journal Of Science & Technology 17.(2007): 87. LexisNexis Academic: Law Reviews. Web. 10 Mar. 2014.
In 1987, United States used DNA evidence to prosecute and convict a serial rapist. It all started in Florida when a woman was awoken by noise. She woke up and a man was standing over her holding a knife towards her, threatening to kill her if she didn’t comply. While she was being raped she started fighting back, she was cut on her neck, legs, feet, and face. Once she was raped the rapist stole her purse and left her home. The victim reported the crime to police shortly after. During an examination a rape kit was performed and evidence of semen was f...
Forensic science has now been recognized as an important part of the law enforcement team to help solve crimes and cold cases. The advances in technology are being used each day and we must continue to strive to develop better advances in this field. The recent discovery of using DNA in criminal cases has helped not only positively identify the suspect, but it has helped exonerate hundreds of innocent individuals. “With new advances in police technology and computer science, crime scene investigation and forensic science will only become more precise as we head into the future.” (Roufa, 2017) Forensic science and evidence helps law enforcement officials solve crimes through the collection, preservation and analysis of evidence. By having a mobile crime laboratory, the scene gets processed quicker and more efficiently. Forensic science will only grow in the future to be a benefit for the criminal justice