The Left Hand Of Darkness Analysis

1127 Words3 Pages

Distorted Perceptions of Gender in Le Guin’s Left Hand of Darkness

There is a palpable existence of cultural and ideological disconnect woven throughout Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness. Such disengagements are generated by a distortion of our own perceived conventions of sex and gender through the perspective of the main character, Genly Ai. Le Guin employs Ai and his own assumptions of sociocultural and gender norms as a reference point for what occupies the established and biological conducts of Gethenian life, yet he finds their mindset difficult to navigate. These disassociations are supported in the conjectures of the following theorists: Judith Butler, Joseph Culler, Candace West and Don H. Zimmerman, and Steven Seidman. …show more content…

Le Guin’s segmentation of gender on Gethen nullifies Joseph Culler’s interpretation of ‘gender’ as inferred by Judith Butler (p. 101-102), wherein gender is considered “performative”. In other words, instead of gender as an integral part of identity of self and one’s role within Gethenian society, an alternative concept of gender is presented where individuals place value on specific gender expressions without devaluing either the expression of masculine or feminine gender displays; “My landlady, a voluble man, arranged my journey to the East “ (Le Guin, 49) Rather, the absence experienced within this conceptual design is a clarifying of gender roles and the incorporation of gender as an aspect of identity. ”Burden and privilege are shared out pretty equally; everybody has the same risk to run or choice to make. Therefore nobody here is quite so free as a free male anywhere else” (Le Guin, …show more content…

Seidman’s interpretation of gender and sexuality in his article “Theoretical Perspectives” . For example, the use of “human pronouns” by Ai throughout the novel is intended for neutrality but inadvertently genders the Gethenians instead. “Wiping sweat from his dark forehead the man—man I must say, having said he and his—the man answers” (Le Guin 5). Ai later attempts to explain the importance of human gender, “In most societies it determines one’s expectations, activities, outlook, ethics, manners—almost everything.” (244) This disillusionment is perpetuated by the male pronoun use and in turn masculates the Gethenians and infers a dominance upon which the male gender reigns. This illusion is disrupted by the equally integrated feminine aspect of the biology within the society. Such as the value placed King Agraven’s pregnancy and having a “child of flesh” as a more preferable heir than a son of kemmer. this segmentthat though according to Seidman sex is “fundamentally social”(12), the Gethenians, due to their biology, are accepting of sexual activity and have no need for "policing" sex. A large disconnect then experienced with separation of gender roles and society is the interpretation of sex as a less social function than traditionally

Open Document