Designing A Job Cost Subsystem

2041 Words5 Pages

The purpose of operating a job cost subsystem for I Do Attire is to calculate and accurately record the direct costs (raw materials and direct labour) of the job so they can provide the accurate selling cost for the product they are producing to their customer, Ace Modeling Agency and so sufficient profit is made. The system allocates overheads to each job so the applied overheads are approximately the same cost as the actual overhead using the appropriate cost driver. In I Do Attire, the direct labour hours were allocated as the cost drivers because they have a lot of designers working to produce the dress.

Each job has raw materials, direct labour and overhead expenses to determine its total cost. The raw materials for I Do Attire producing a dress for Miss NZ dress are french lace fabric, pearl buttons, chiffon, organza and satin ribbon. The direct labour hour is determined in the information from the source documents such as the material requisitions forms and job cost cards. The overhead rate is including all the indirect costs such as factory maintenance and factory general expenses and it will be calculated depending on the number of hours that the business has worked which is 55 hours for this job.

The job cost subsystem ensures that the costs of each job are gathered all in one place so the total cost of each job is identified. The identified total cost ($2783.70) will then allow markup and GST ($5877.26) to be added so the appropriate cost is invoiced to the customer for the job. The job cost subsystem also allows I Do Attire to identify which types of jobs are more profitable, so I Do Attire can focus to gain more profit in that job. It also identifies the accurate cost for each job, so the appropriate cost can be pr...

... middle of paper ...

... than it should have been, having a markup rate 80% of $2783.70, totalling $5010.66. This means the overall profit decreased by the underapplied overheads and the markup of the amount. This is a custom made dress For Miss NZ which will be representing our country in competition which means it will be very unique such as having a New Zealand symbol like Koru design on the dress. Therefore, the markup of 80% is not fair not it should be increased.

By having a underapplied overhead to the Miss NZ dress, during the year, I Do Attire might have quoted too low a price for the job. If I Do Attire increased the quoted price, allowing for a higher overhead rate, then I Do Attire might miss out on future contracts to competitors. I Do Attire might need to review overhead costs to see if these can be reduced in the future, so business can remain competitive.

Sayano Murayama

Open Document