Death Of A Salesman Nourishment Analysis

933 Words2 Pages

It is proven that plants need proper nourishment and attention in order to grow large, and thrive in the world. In the play, Death of a Salesman, written by Arthur Miller, Biff Loman, the eldest son of Willy Loman, an old washed out salesman, and Bernard, the son of Charley, a successful and self-sufficient businessman, both receive unique nourishment in an attempt to grow and flourish. Willy and Charley have different expectations for their children, unique methods of raising them, and in the end, both Biff and Bernard turn out differently from each other revealing the families to be perfect foils.

Willy and Charley want the best for their children and hold different parental expectations for them. Both parents want their children to grow …show more content…

Willy and Charley motivate their children in different ways, as Willy has Bernard “give [Biff] the answers” (26) while Charley just “[let’s] [Bernard] go” (9) in order to find his own path. Willy’s parenting style is stricter as he does not let Biff fulfill his dreams of working with his hands and living on a ranch, while Bernard is allowed to flourish as a Supreme Court lawyer. Both parents have different personalities that affect their children. Willy is always on his high horse, being arrogant saying comments such as “Go to Filene’s, go to the Hub, go to Slattery’s, Boston. Call out the name Willy Loman and see what happens” (43). In contrast, Charley’s parenting can be shown through his son Bernard as he is humble by not mentioning his Supreme Court case. Willy is constantly boastful believing he is the king of the world and tries to have his children believe so as well. This is very different from Charley’s style of being modest, which his son inherits as is vividly shown through his actions and behavior. Lastly, how both parents act is an essential factor that affects their children. Willy acts more as a friend than a father. When Biff steals the football, Willy tells him “coach’ll probably congratulate you on your initiative” (19), while Bernard has never stolen anything as he knows his father does not approve of it. Biff learned from an early age that stealing was acceptable, which gives him a …show more content…

One way of comparing the success of two men is how many children they have. The more children they raise, the more successful they are. Biff still being “up in the air” (12) has zero children while the fruitful Bernard has two. Bernard edges Biff out with his two children making him an extremely more successful man. Another way of rivaling two men’s success in life is their occupation. Biff, the unrooted shrub “has yet to make more than thirty-five dollars a week” (7). In contrast, the cunning Bernard is a prosperous lawyer who is prestigious enough to “[argue] a case in front of the Supreme Court” (69). Bernard once again surpasses Biff as being a lawyer is a very prestigious, well-paying job, compared to Biff who does not even have enough to make a proper living. Lastly, a way of assessing the success of a man is how well liked they are by the people around them, Biff started as the popular superstar football player in high school who becomes an unpopular “bum” (95), while Bernard, the young nerd who gave him test answers became so successful he “[does not] even mention” (69) arguing a Supreme Court case. Bernard vastly outclasses Biff in adulthood through his popularity, a trait Bernard seldom cares for. Upon reaching adulthood, Bernard achievements drastically outclass Biff’s which creates the perfect foil that no one can

Open Document