Current Ratio And Quick Ratio

1552 Words4 Pages

Current Ratio and Quick Ratio Compared to the previous year, current ratio and quick ratio respectively rose 0.01 (from 0.63 to 0.64) and 0.04 (from 0.15 to 0.19), but both of them were lower than 1. It indicates that the firm’s current assets were just sufficient to cover for 0.64 of the firm’s short term liabilities, and the firm was just able to settle 19% of its current liabilities instantaneously. Cash and cash equivalents had increased by 138.5% to £64.4 million. The cash generated from operating activities has a small fall during the year, however, the notes show that profit before taxation decreased by £33.2 million, caused by adverse conditional trades and a weak currency, which had some negative effect such as weak sales during peak selling seasons or extreme or unseasonal weather conditions, failing to compete effectively, and a loss of profit when experiencing low exchange rate. The amount of Debenhams purchased property, plant and equipment has less £11.4 million than last year, but increased £6.1 cost in purchase of intangible assets such as the control of production and goodwill. In financing activities, drawdown of revolving credit facility was up to £200 million which was 33.33 times bigger than last year. To obtain assurance on the effectiveness and the cash level in order to improve current assets to pay short term debts, and compliance with, the risk management framework, Debenhams issued £225 million senior notes at a coupon rate of 5.25% on 2 July 2014, at the same day, the Group cancelled its existing term loan and revolving credit facility and drew down on a new revolving credit facility amounting to £425.0 million. The different reductions in inventories and trade and other receivables, are £12.2 millio... ... middle of paper ... ...inancials. Both of two companies possessed the near short trade receivables collection period; it is seen as optimal, as it indicates that they could take a short time to turn its receivables into cash. However, the trade payable payment period of Debenhams was longer than Marks & Spencer’s around 11 to 21 days in these 5 years. It indicates that Debenhams has a higher creditworthiness or did a better job in taking full advantage of the credit terms allowed by suppliers, but maybe the managers of M&S have made payments promptly to avail the discount offered by suppliers. All in all, Marks & Spencer did a better job than Debenhams in 2014 financial year. It is worth mentioning that Debenhams joins M&S at Scunthorpe Retail Park, and the scheme was signed up in May 2012, and the New Retail Park was opened on the 24th October 2014, and it will be a new chance to compete.

Open Document