It is very apparent that there is an abundance of cultural norms and moral ideals that exist throughout the world with a large variance in similarity. With so many opinions held about what is right or wrong, a cultural relativist may try to argue that none are either right or wrong, except within the context of their own culture. This argument appears plausible because it acknowledges the many different cultural norms and it seems to prevent any single group from claiming moral superiority over another. How...
... middle of paper ...
...rent, it is often the case the cultures share similar core values that govern their moral decisions. Because of this it can be argued that there does exist an objective set of values, but the expression of those values may be subjective. The cultural relativists’ claim that those outside of a certain culture are unable to understand its moral decisions is also one that is seemingly fair and correct. But people are able to understand cultures different than their own, people not only posses the ability to empathize, but people have also been assimilating for centuries. This ability to understand and evaluate other culture’s norms is what ultimately drives human cultural progression, without the ever changing nature of morality, human culture would come to a stand-still. For these reasons cultural relativism is a moral theory that misunderstands the nature of morality.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- This study will define the diversity of moral values through the theory of Cultural Relativism (CR) that refutes the paradigm that there is a “right” or “wrong” in the moral paradigms of differing cultures. Rachel defines the important moral question of macrocosmic moral paradigms that claim ”righteousness”, yet individual societies have their own moral codes that deviate from these norms. CR defines the importance of diverse moral perspectives throughout the world, which refute any type of absolutist definition of morality.... [tags: Morality, Culture, Sociology, Cultural relativism]
1133 words (3.2 pages)
- Moral relativism is the view that “there is no single true morality. There are many different moral frameworks, none of which is more correct than others.”In this essay, I’m going to evaluate Moral Relativism theory introduced by Gilbert Harman. I will discuss the determinacy and applicability of Moral Relativism. Harman explains that -Various cultures have different beliefs and perceptions about right and wrong and act differently regarding their beliefs. -Moral right and wrong (good and bad, justice and injustice, virtue and vice, etc.) are always relative to a choice of moral framework.... [tags: Morality, Culture, Cultural relativism, Ethics]
790 words (2.3 pages)
- Cultural Relativism Cultural Relativism is the theory that ethical and moral standards are based on what a particular society deems to be good or bad. Since different societies have different beliefs, cultural relativists believe there are many moral codes in the world. Cultural relativists believe there is no universal moral code, which is an independent standard that defines what is right or wrong all of the time, regardless of place. There are many different examples of Cultural Relativism in society.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture]
1275 words (3.6 pages)
- For many years now, people have always wondered what ethical principle is the right one to follow. These individuals are all seeking the answer to the question that the ethical principles are trying to clarify: What defines moral behavior. The Divine Command Theory and the theories of cultural relativism are two principles of many out there that provide us with explanations on what our ethical decisions are based on and what we consider to be our moral compass in life. Even though these two theories make well-supported arguments on why they are the right principle to follow, it is hard to pinpoint which one should guide our choices because of the wide array of ethical systems.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Cultural relativism, Religion]
1099 words (3.1 pages)
- Cultural relativism is the term given to the idea that there are no universal moral values that apply to all mankind and that every culture has its own set of moral principles. This set of principles varies from culture to culture, and it is extremely rare, if not totally impossible, to find a moral principle that is followed by all cultures. For example, the idea of arranged marriages, which is the concept of two families marrying their son and daughter even though they don’t particularly know each other, is fairly common in Indian culture but non-existent in American culture.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
1457 words (4.2 pages)
- Weigh Prinz’s argument for moral relativism against the anti-relativist arguments put by James Rachel in “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism.” Explain both philosophers cases. Which argument is stronger in your view and why. Defend your answer. From a young age, people question whether they are morally right about things all around them. Have our morals been taught to us from a young age. Do they truly exist are are they a norm imposed to people by society. Does morality really exist or is it just a creation of our imagination.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Cultural relativism]
1470 words (4.2 pages)
- In this paper I will argue that cultural relativism is a weak argument. Cultural relativism is the theory that all ethical and moral claims are relative to culture and custom (Rachels, 56). Pertaining to that definition, I will present the idea that cultural relativism is flawed in the sense that it states that there is no universal standard of moral and ethical values. First, I will suggest that cultural relativism underestimates similarities between cultures. Second, I will use the overestimating differences perspective to explain the importance of understanding context, intention and purpose behind an act.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture, Ethics]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- In his essay, “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism,” James Rachels argues that cultural relativism is an unsatisfactory moral theory because it is based upon an invalid argument, if cultural relativism were true, this would have some troubling and implausible consequences, and there are some moral rules common to all societies. In this short paper, I will argue that moral objectivism is a more satisfactory moral theory than ethical relativism. Vaughn first defines ethical relativism by stating that moral standards are not objective, but are relative to what individuals or cultures believe (Vaughn 13).... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Culture, Cultural relativism]
1031 words (2.9 pages)
- According to William Penn "Right is right, even if everyone is against it; and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it.” The theory of relativism was first thought of by an ancient Greek sophist, Protagoras. He stated that “man is the measure of all things.” Which means man is the ultimate source of value. If we took a look at the world today, we would see that are many other cultures other than our own. With many cultures within the world, everyone is bound to believe that every culture is different.... [tags: Culture, Cultural relativism, Truth]
707 words (2 pages)
- 2. Is it wrong to criticise the moral practices of people from other cultures. How would a Cultural Relativist answer that question. How would you answer that question. There are many ethical issues and beliefs that come into debate when the practices of another culture are believed to be immoral, cultural relativism is an attempt at solving these moral disputes by encouraging an attitude of tolerance to all cultural practices. The principle of cultural relativism that holds that the practices of another culture cannot be judged as right or wrong on any independent standard as morality is dependant on one’s own cultural upbringing.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture, Value]
1638 words (4.7 pages)