Ethical relativism, on the other hand, deals more specifically with the issue of morality, and states that the moral rightness or wrongness of one’s actions is different in every culture and can also vary from individual to individual, rather than there being a set of universal moral values that would apply to everyone. For example, polygamy is widely accepted in Islamic culture, but is gravely looked down upon as immoral in other cultures. Despite the common factor in both cultural and ethical relativism that there is no set of universal moral values, it is possible for an individual to be culturally relative without being an ethical relativist. This is possible as I could have a view that a particular culture is just simply mistaken in their moral beliefs, and they cannot abide by certain universally valid principles. For example, as a Hindu I may believe that cows are sacred and not eat beef, but do not necessarily find it “immoral” or “wrong” that people from other cultur...
... middle of paper ...
... For example, the violence against the Jews by the Nazi party is morally wrong and despised despite what the moral beliefs of the Nazi culture were.
In order to determine the morality of a culture’s practices, without being an innate part of that culture, we can always ask if the practice is being advantageous or disadvantageous to the members of the culture. For example, the apartheid in South Africa was doing more harm than good and this fact was an objective reason to label this practice immoral. This standard of morality seems to transcend cultural variances.
Even if the concept of ethical relativism is false, as I believe it is, it plays an important role in teaching us that different cultures have different moral principles, as well as questioning the reasons for our own principles and the underlying reasons for different cultures to have varying moral codes.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- This study will define the diversity of moral values through the theory of Cultural Relativism (CR) that refutes the paradigm that there is a “right” or “wrong” in the moral paradigms of differing cultures. Rachel defines the important moral question of macrocosmic moral paradigms that claim ”righteousness”, yet individual societies have their own moral codes that deviate from these norms. CR defines the importance of diverse moral perspectives throughout the world, which refute any type of absolutist definition of morality.... [tags: Morality, Culture, Sociology, Cultural relativism]
1133 words (3.2 pages)
- 2. Is it wrong to criticise the moral practices of people from other cultures. How would a Cultural Relativist answer that question. How would you answer that question. There are many ethical issues and beliefs that come into debate when the practices of another culture are believed to be immoral, cultural relativism is an attempt at solving these moral disputes by encouraging an attitude of tolerance to all cultural practices. The principle of cultural relativism that holds that the practices of another culture cannot be judged as right or wrong on any independent standard as morality is dependant on one’s own cultural upbringing.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture, Value]
1638 words (4.7 pages)
- Assess the merits and pitfalls of cultural relativism in contemporary anthropology. Cultural relativism is a contentious methodological and theoretical stance in anthropology, which advises that cultures should only be contemplated in their own context. This was conceptualised by Franz Boas (Boas, 1904). It rests on the idea that cultures are formed through the accumulative process of enculturation. Each culture has evolved in its own circumstances, thus it cannot be judged from a different framework (Herskovitz, 1955).... [tags: Culture, Cultural relativism]
1829 words (5.2 pages)
- Weigh Prinz’s argument for moral relativism against the anti-relativist arguments put by James Rachel in “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism.” Explain both philosophers cases. Which argument is stronger in your view and why. Defend your answer. From a young age, people question whether they are morally right about things all around them. Have our morals been taught to us from a young age. Do they truly exist are are they a norm imposed to people by society. Does morality really exist or is it just a creation of our imagination.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Cultural relativism]
1470 words (4.2 pages)
- In this paper I will argue that cultural relativism is a weak argument. Cultural relativism is the theory that all ethical and moral claims are relative to culture and custom (Rachels, 56). Pertaining to that definition, I will present the idea that cultural relativism is flawed in the sense that it states that there is no universal standard of moral and ethical values. First, I will suggest that cultural relativism underestimates similarities between cultures. Second, I will use the overestimating differences perspective to explain the importance of understanding context, intention and purpose behind an act.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture, Ethics]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- Introduction Relativism is quickly dominating the cultural landscape of America, as proponents propagate messages of open-mindedness, social and religious tolerance, situational ethics, and the nonexistence of objective truth. Although relativism receives universal application throughout every facet of the human experience, the philosophy becomes especially significant when addressing moral concerns, such as abortion, dying with dignity, etc. While the concept of relativism appears superficially progressive, promising to eradicate discrimination and innumerable social barriers, the philosophy proves irrational under scrutiny.... [tags: Morality, Truth, Moral relativism]
730 words (2.1 pages)
- Moral relativism is the view that “there is no single true morality. There are many different moral frameworks, none of which is more correct than others.”In this essay, I’m going to evaluate Moral Relativism theory introduced by Gilbert Harman. I will discuss the determinacy and applicability of Moral Relativism. Harman explains that -Various cultures have different beliefs and perceptions about right and wrong and act differently regarding their beliefs. -Moral right and wrong (good and bad, justice and injustice, virtue and vice, etc.) are always relative to a choice of moral framework.... [tags: Morality, Culture, Cultural relativism, Ethics]
790 words (2.3 pages)
- Cultural Relativism is a moral theory which states that due to the vastly differing cultural norms held by people across the globe, morality cannot be judged objectively, and must instead be judged subjectively through the lense of an individuals own cultural norms. Because it is obvious that there are many different beliefs that are held by people around the world, cultural relativism can easily be seen as answer to the question of how to accurately and fairly judge the cultural morality of others, by not doing so at all.... [tags: Culture, Cultural relativism, Morality, Value]
1079 words (3.1 pages)
- The debate between moral relativists and moral cognitivists is centered around the question of whether there exists a metric by which actions and intentions can be judged. To avoid any confusion and prevent the opportunity for any strawman attacks, morality will be considered in a broad sense as the distinction between what a person ought to do and ought not do. Also, moral relativism will be defined as holding the belief that moral actions are relative, or subjective, to contextual circumstance and that there exists no metric by which actions and intentions can thereby be globally judged.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Relativism, Culture]
1028 words (2.9 pages)
- The world contains a great numbers of different cultures that vary from different countries. Sometimes we found other culture interesting or hard to understand. I believe that moral relativism is a unilateral argument that people who consider this standpoint ignore the fact that there are universal standard and the moral progress happen in the society. Based on culture relativism, there is no definitely right or wrong moral standards which they all depend on different culture or different person.... [tags: Culture, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
1167 words (3.3 pages)
- Litmus Test Is Important For American Politics
- Balance Sheet Provided Or Xy Bank And Cover The Differences Between A Company
- `` Shadow Of Doubt `` By Alfred Hitchcock
- Health And Safety At Work Act
- The Value Of A Firm Keeps Changing Due
- How Local Governments Protect Local Businesses Through Instruments Of Trade Policy