Comparing Cry the Beloved Country and To Kill a Mockingbird

963 Words2 Pages

Did you know that there are many similarities between the characters in the books To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee and Cry, the Beloved Country by Alan Paton? Everyone has many character traits, sometimes sharing traits with another person, as the people in Cry, the Beloved Country share traits with the people in To Kill a Mockingbird. In both of these books there are characters that have the traits of being caring, non-prejudice, and innocence.

One of the main traits shared between these two books is being non-prejudice. The main character in To Kill a Mockingbird is Atticus, father of Scout and Jem, and Arthur Jarvis in Cry, the Beloved Country. Although Atticus demonstrated how un-prejudice he is many times, a few stood out. “‘Atticus Finch is the same in his house as he is on the public street’” (Lee 46). This shows that Atticus treats everyone the same, whether it be his own children or someone he sees in town. “‘You know the truth, and the truth is this: some Negroes lie, some Negroes are immoral, some Negro men are not to be trusted around women-black of white. Buy this is a truth that applies to the human race and to no particular race of men.’” (Lee 204). This part of Atticus’ speech begins with him saying something that by itself would be racist, buy what he says after shows that he believes is true in Negroes he also believes to be true in all races of man, once again showing that he doesn’t judge by color of skin. “‘From the Bishop, and the Acting Prime Minister, and the Mayor, and from dozens of others, And from native organizations too, something called the Daughters of Africa, and a whole lot of others that I can’t remember, And from coloured people, and Indians, and Jews.’” (Paton 171). This shows how Arthur Jarvis is un-prejudice because people of all races sent messages, showing that they respected him because he treated everyone equally. “‘It is true that we hoped to preserve the tribal system by a policy of segregation. That was permissible. Buy we never did it thoroughly of honestly. We set aside one-tenth of the land for four-fifths of the people. Thus we made it inevitable, and some say we did it knowingly, that labour would come to the towns. We are caught in the toils of our own selfishness.’” (Paton 179).

Open Document