Analysis Of Christine De Pizan's The Book Of The City Of Ladies

1172 Words3 Pages

Women have always been unjustifiably vilified, and opposition to this criticism has been a rather recent development, gaining strides only in the past few decades. Feminism, a movement that is defined as one to establish and to achieve equal opportunities for women in an eclectic breadth of fields, was only coined in 1837 by Utopian Socialist Charles Fourier (“History and Theory of Feminism”). Additionally, some modern historians consider the start of feminism to begin only in the late 19th century when women fought on legal issues such as the absence of women’s suffrage. Nonetheless, Christine de Pizan’s The Book of the City of Ladies, which was completed in 1405, is a literary work that was written in response to male writers whom de Pizan …show more content…

The existing notion held by some men at that time was that men were superior over women and that women are inherently the feeble gender. However, de Pizan questions this claim by alluding to the Bible. De Pizan asserts, “There he made Adam fall asleep and formed the body of woman from one of his ribs, which signifies that she should be at is side as a companion and not at his feet like a slave, and also that he should love her as his own flesh” (de Pizan 132). De Pizan provides a new, provocative interpretation of this bible excerpt by contending that God Himself intended for women to be equal to men, rather than inferior. Because Eve was formed from Adam’s flesh, De Pizan concludes that men and women, who both have the same flesh, blood and of the same constitution in all respects, are equal powers. She challenges the misogyny that has plagued her time by referring to a literary text that men cannot state as false. Although de Pizan’s beliefs that women are not inferior to men were considered unconventional during her lifetime, they helped serve as a model for feminism centuries later. Jill E. Wagner from the University of Iowa, argues in her scholarly journal, “Christine de Pizan 's City of Ladies: A Monumental Reconstruction of, by, and for Women of All Time,” that, “Christine builds a feminist framework for the future. She can be considered the founder of the modern women 's movement, [by] …show more content…

Some men believe that women, inherently, cannot be successful at various areas such as in religion and jurisdiction. However, she demonstrates that women have achieved success at rates similar to those of men when given equal opportunities. De Pizan argues that women are capable of being enlightened and educated, dispelling the myth that women don’t play a vital role in society by mentioning influential women in various fields who had been extremely important. For example, de Pizan specifically mentions Nicostrata who “was the first to establish laws in [Rome] which later on become so famous and from which came and issued all just laws” (de Pizan 138). Men have attacked women of being incapable of yielding control and having power; however, de Pizan’s allusion to Nicostrata delineates the vital role she played, through her jurisdiction, in nascent Rome. Additionally, de Pizan adds that Nicostrata “demonstrated her wisdom and the excellence of her mind to future centuries; she labored and studied until she came up with her own letters… [in which] nothing more worthy was ever invented in this world” (de Pizan 139). De Pizan demonstrates that women, in fact, can be important members of a society, challenging the beliefs by men during her time; she champions an increased recognition of women’s success, which is often overlooked and disregarded by men, and she proposes the notion

Open Document