Chile Water Privatization

Chile Water Privatization

Length: 1518 words (4.3 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
Justification for intervention for economic regulatory efforts arises out of alleged inability of the marketplace to deal with particular structural problems. Of course, details of any program often reflect political force, not reasoned argument. Yet thoughtful justification is still needed when programs are evaluated.[1]

The case of water reform in Chile is an interesting one. First of all, it allows us to think about a situation where regulatory reforms face political decision-making through the outcome of proposed legislation. Secondly, the case doesn’t deal with lack of political commitment, but rather involves a situation where the government now faces an important question of passing a legislation that directly affects their households – the main question is not whether to privatize, but how to regulate what will be privatized. Finally, it shows us the importance of having a credible and independent regulatory framework in order to have effective reforms.

Despite the successful accomplishment of SENDOS, government had few concerns it was facing with publicly owned companies:

- It had to restructure the public entity that was responsible for regulating quality while providing the service. SENDOS did not have the authority for economic regulation and control of tariffs which was under the Ministry of Economy. Only after the reforms a regulatory agency, SISS was established and given a right, among others, to set tariffs and audit companies. But even then, it was constrained it its ability due to much dependency on the government.

- The regulatory system did not provide the government with credible checks and balances system. Besides defining a geographic area the company was obliged to serve, a lot was unclear including indefinite duration of concessions, giving companies the right to transfer or sub-contract to another provider which could be revoked by the government for non-compliance with procedures for revocation that were not spelled out. This added to the next issue of financing of water utilities.

- The government heavily depended on appropriations from national budget and loans. Because of the existence of insufficient tariffs to cover operating costs, government had to bring changes in management and the structure of regulation separating the quality and tariff regulatory functions from those of service provision. Sewerage treatment needed significant investments in water treatment especially in metropolitan area Santiago. Although three new water treatment plants were planned to be constructed under BOT with EMOS, targets of treating 100 percent of all wastewater by 2005 set by the Chilean administration did not seem realistic given an increase (up to 80 percent) in the amount of funding now needed for annual investment.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Chile Water Privatization." 123HelpMe.com. 24 Apr 2019
    <https://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=164184>.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

An Introduction Of Chile 's Educational Landscape Essay

- An Introduction to Chile’s Educational Landscape In Chile, the education system remains subject to some of the lingering legacies of Augusto Pinochet’s military dictatorship – especially his pro-market reforms and privatization efforts. Since the Pinochet era, the Chilean government is investing less for education by shifting the costs directly to families and paying lower salaries to younger teachers in lieu of increasing taxes. As a result, there is a significant degree of school choice in Chile, with the theory arguing that that parents will choose better performing schools, and those schools will organize themselves to be better performers in order to attract students and gain pay premiu...   [tags: Education, School, Chile, Poverty]

Research Papers
1087 words (3.1 pages)

The Ethics Of The Water Crisis Essay

- For Shiva, the roots of her argument come from a conflict over two different ideological beliefs. One sees water as a common resource that should be freely available and conscientiously conserved; the other sees water as a market good to be possessed, bought and sold. The market proponents argue that the water crisis can be alleviated by privatizing water: places with more water can sell to places with less water and the higher prices will lead to conservation even though those who control the water....   [tags: Water resources, Water, Water supply]

Research Papers
1099 words (3.1 pages)

Essay on Brazil and Privatization

- Brazil and Privatization The earliest inhabitants of Brazil were the Indians. However, the country’s recorded history begins with the arrival of the Portuguese in 1500. The Portuguese sailor Pedro Alvares Cabral visited the continent we call South America, eight years after Columbus arrived in America. Portuguese settlers followed, calling the new colony Brazil, after the brazilwood tree that they extracted red dye from. The Portuguese did not bring prosperity and progress to the Indians....   [tags: Brazil Economy Culture History Essays]

Research Papers
4020 words (11.5 pages)

A Short Note On The Privatization Of Water Essays

- Waters Wars clearly conveys the growing problem of nonegalitarian access to clean water. Vandana Shiva combines both anecdotal and statistical analysis to back her argumentation. Over the course of seven chapters, she demonstrates how water is being polluted, who is responsible and affected, and how water should be treated. Climate and industry are major sources of pollution. Severe flood and storm events destroy sewer and irrigation systems while contaminating the water supply. High demand for precious metals and petroleum lead conglomerates to invest in practises that degrade the watershed....   [tags: Water resources, Water crisis, Water]

Research Papers
701 words (2 pages)

Essay on Water Scarcity: Privatization is Not the Solution

- Although water is all around, very little is drinkable. Six billion people live on earth and 1.1 billion in 31 countries are unable to access safe, clean drinking water. California has only 20 years of water supply left. Ironically, even the wettest place on earth, Cherrapunji, India, has often water shortages. After years of millions of people dying of thirst and disease, a corporate movement to find a solution to the water crisis has now swept the world. Water, a fleeting resource vital to every life, every single day of the year, is now being taken out of the governments control and becoming a commodity bought and sold by big business, a.k.a privatization....   [tags: Global Water Crisis]

Research Papers
1213 words (3.5 pages)

Water Scarcity: Privatization is Not the Solution Essay

- Water is vital for humanity as it sustains human life and is a fundamental aspect in most of the products which are consumed by an average living person. This is why water supplies are crucial, because through them this substance is provided sadly these services are being perturbed by various obstacles that at the end are provoking a severe water scarcity around the globe. This has been attempted to be solved by privatising water services, since it is believed that water available for free has generated an overexploitation of this resource....   [tags: Drinking Water Shortage]

Research Papers
1057 words (3 pages)

Drinking Water Privatization Essay

- I am on the cusp of a new industry, soon to be sweeping across the globe. Armed with little but a wet-dry vacuum, several filters, and empty jelly jars, I have found a way to bottle oxygen. Right now, I sell my oxygen to major companies that need oxygen to produce their products, such as agribusiness corporations to grow plants and Pepsi to make carbonated bubbles. Every time I wheel my machine into the middle of town, people complain between struggled breaths. My local government claims that oxygen is a need, not a right....   [tags: Potable Water Privatization]

Research Papers
1854 words (5.3 pages)

Water Privatization: Private vs. Public Essay

- Water has become a very controversial issue in the United States and around the world. As populations increase and resources decrease, the way we use our resources and keep populations safe become more and more important. Throughout the world there are nearly 1.1 billion people who do not have access the clean drinking water. 5 Most of these 1.1 billion people are located in poor areas and do not have the financial means to build the infrastructures needed to provide water to the citizens of their country....   [tags: Private vs. Public Ownership of Water]

Research Papers
963 words (2.8 pages)

Privatization Essay

- Privatization Privatizing services is a more attractive option for most local governments and is widely practiced around the state. There are certain government services in which it is impractical to create a free competitive market. For others, it is almost impossible to predict the potential success or failure of privatization. These unclear predictions make privatization a very complicated issue for local governments. The combination of rapidly rising service costs and slowly increasing revenues has led officials in some cities and counties to use non-traditional income services to fund government options....   [tags: Government Businesses Papers]

Research Papers
3815 words (10.9 pages)

Privatization Essay

- The term Privatization is often loosely used to mean a number of related activities, including any expansion of the scope of private sector activity in an economy and the adoption by the public sector of efficiency enhancing techniques commonly employed by the private sector. While acknowledging that no definition of privatization is water tight, we will define privatization, for the purpose of this paper, as the transfer of productive asset ownership and control from the public to the private sector.1 The transfer of assets can be total, partial or functionary, with the sale being implemented by methods such as private sales, leasing arrangements, employee buy outs and share issues....   [tags: private sector / public sector]

Free Essays
469 words (1.3 pages)

Although reforms under new democratic government in 90s successfully restructured management of water utilities, under CORFO, public corporations still remained unable to issue debt to finance operations and investment. This was a key difference between public and private corporations after reforming the ownership structure.

Part of the success of improving performance of the CORFO-owned companies was outsourcing elements of their operations to the private sector under service contracts which resulted in very high staff productivity. However, this was the case mainly with EMOS which had most of its activities outsourced.

While analyzing the case, it’s important to keep in mind that, although water service was successful under public ownership, question remains whether the success will be sustained given the constraints mentioned below:

a. Government’s limited national budget
b. Lack of positive incentives, such as profit sharing or bonuses. No incentives were provided to spur management to the levels of efficiency that might be attained by a private profit-maximizing firm.
c. Although political intervention seemed to only be aimed at facilitating reforms for better, the potential risk of political pressure on the boards of the water companies still existed. Political interference becomes especially important in the debate of Congress resolving the issue.
d. Goal 1 of the new legislation: “Separate the quality and tariff regulatory functions from those of service provision” doesn’t seem to serve its purpose due to the fact that the service provision which is under SENDOS and responsible for social regulation remains under the same Ministry as the tariff regulatory agency SISS, both of whom are under the Ministry of Public Works. The rest of the four goals cannot be achieve if a strong independent regulatory framework is not created

The fact the Lo Castillo failed to meet the expectations of the government and population in providing efficient service and coverage, it doesn’t mean that private participation fails for same reasons.

Lo Castillo’s problem may have resulted from its corporate goal of profit-maximization and prioritizing on shareholders’ return on investment rather than ensuring public welfare which in turn resulted in underinvestment in infrastructure to expand its water supply. Assuming that the company had the financial and managerial capacity to invest in expansion of services but failed to deal with the crisis also proved that the family-run business prioritized its profit-maximization in the short-run. One can argue that lack investment of Lo Castillo was due to the pending approval of its development plan by SISS in both years 1991 and 1995. However, SISS, as a regulatory agency was unable to impose substantial fines on the company or have clear procedures in place for revoking company’s concession. This resulted in failure of Lo Castillo to use its water rights to meet the growing demand, thus, proving regulatory contracts very important in state-owned enterprise reform along with performance and management contracts.

To attain desired outcomes – improved enterprise performance, privatization with regulation works well when governments do three things: first, reduce the firm’s information advantage by increasing competition; second, devise rewards and penalties, primarily in the form of pricing regulations, that induce the firm to operate efficiently and pass some of the savings on to consumers; finally, demonstrating commitment to protect producers against opportunistic behavior by future regimes so that owners will make investments necessary to upgrade and extend service.[2] The second measure seems to be the central question for SISS given the fact that the government was unable to compel the company to solve the problem.

In addition, as claimed by the general manager of the Enersis, 75 percent of the problem was simply a managerial issue. If that is the case, this points to the problem of lack of incentives to stimulate the management of the CORFO-owned companies.

Although Enersis was able to solve Lo Castilo’s problem during the crisis and has the management experience, as the first multi-utility company in South America and a privatized monopoly of electricity in Chile, there is no guarantee that it will not face unforeseen obstacles it managing another strategic utility sector of water and sanitation. The obstacles, mentioned above, could only be avoided if an effective regulatory framework is in place through legislation that doesn’t involve political interference and affect fair and equitable price-setting, for both investors and consumers.

In answering the question of divestiture of all or portion of the water companies to private operators, I would suggest careful examination of the proposed regulatory reforms. The question for Chile is whether these reforms were enough and would protect consumers and investors. It is important to note that the ownership share of EMOS and ESVAL is unlimited (up to 100 percent) whereas private ownership of the remaining eleven companies is legally limited to 51 percent, making the legislation reform even more important and take into consideration Enersis’ plan to strategically position itself to own specifically EMOS and ESVAL. Under no condition Chilean government should divest from water utilities until it ensures credible and effective autonomy of SISS accompanied with increased resources and effective regulatory reforms as proposed by the Lower-House of Congress, and not the Senate. The government may create even bigger problems with disastrous outcomes if the Senate approves 100 percent divestiture on top of removing the bill’s main regulatory provisions.

The optimal solution is establishing a regulatory framework that is independent financially and administratively from the central government, and ideally backed with strong judiciary, and rule of law.

The case of Chile shows us that it is crucial for a regulatory agency to establish strong and independent monitoring and auditing arm. Certainly, any reform must first be politically desirable to the leadership for it to be successful and have the support of key actors such as members of the legislature, as well as be credible to investors. It seems important for the Chilean government to make sure politics stays apart from decision-making of the reform, especially in issues of economic regulation that effect the whole country; potential threat is that Congress members might vote for a reform in favor of Santiago’s upper-income area.

In conclusion, successful regulatory regime should provide incentives to invest, expand services, operate efficiently and protect consumers from exploitation.

Tariffs should be calculated in order to make sure they cover the costs (investment, operating, maintenance etc) at the same time are fair to consumers.
-----------------------
[1] Regulation and Its Reform, Chapter 1 – Typical Justifications for Regulation; Stephen Breyer, Harvard University Press, 1982
[2]BUREAUCRATS IN BUSINESS: THE ECONOMICS AND POLITICS OF
GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP
A World Bank Policy Research Report, New York, Oxford University Press, 1995. Chapter 3, Contracting: What Works, What Doesn’t, And Why
Return to 123HelpMe.com