Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues in auditing
Ethical requirements in auditing
The importance of ethics in auditing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In this case an audit firm Cardinal & Coyote LLP is confronted with a decision if they should accept n a new audit client Jost Furniture International. Sharon Rules, the managing partner of the audit firm, had been approached by Jerry Jost, the CEO of Jost Furniture, and requested the audit firm to formulate a bid for the 2010-year-end audit. Rules delegated the task to Yancy Corliss, who is a new partner in the firm. Corliss asked Lanny Beaudean to lead his team in this project. Beaudean had recently obtained his CPA license and quickly advanced to audit senior at the firm after only a few years. He grouped Vinnie Gabelli and Jackie Oloff to be on the team responsible for performing risk assessment on this project. The audit firm had …show more content…
The auditors are threatened by the fact that if they give any opinion other than unqualified opinion, they will be dismissed. In the case, two auditors have already been discharged by citing in their report of the going concern problems affecting the firm. This creates a conflict of interest. Beaudean has also caused a stir with the ethical problems. The auditor went ahead to appoint Jackie Oloff who is a wife to the Arizona States University professor of accounting. The wife herself is not a CPA and she therefore does not qualify to act in the capacity of a CPA since she is incompetent. Lack of response from the Miles Frazer is professionally unethical since the auditors need to be communicated any material facts about the company regarding any legal matters or litigation before accepting the audit …show more content…
• Communicate with the outgoing auditors to find the reason of their dismissal and whether the right procedures were followed for the discharge.
• Recruit only professional, qualified and competent auditors and CPAs who will help with the audit work.
• Obtain a letter of representation from the management on their responsibility to warrant that the amounts recorded in the books of account and financial statements are true and fair. Furthermore, any important information required to be disclosed to the audit firm by the CEO must be disclosed such as any legal matters etc.
By doing so, I will examine the past records of financial performance to recognize whether there are any going concern problems and if there were any problems with the going concern, adequate measures have been placed. Any matters that may affect the operations of the firm and the going concern such as legal matters should also be addressed. All loan covenants should also be upheld. Upon the confirmation and adherence to the above factors, I would accept the
Andrea may decide not to inform the limited partners about the misrepresentation of Skyline Views’s financial statements; to avoid conflict, this decision permits Ed to deceive the company and limited partners. In addition, by deciding not to inform the limited partners of Ed’s deceit, Andrea would be disregarding the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Code of Professional Conduct in her being unreliable, dishonest and deceitful. Andrea has the responsibility of protecting her client, which involves encouraging the correction of financial statements in order to prevent suspicion during audits that could lead to fines and imprisonment. Andrea’s second option is to inform the limited partners about how misrepresentations of Skyline Views’s financial statements are permitting Ed to claim a higher management fee; this decision will fulfill her due diligence obligation to the limited partners while maintaining her integrity as a certified public accountant in supporting the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Code of Professional Conduct.
The principles of the AICPA Code of Conduct should guide the work that Jose and Emily do as auditors. The principles that specifically apply to this situation are Responsibilities, The Public Interest, and Due Care. CPAs have the responsibility to “exercise sensitive professional and moral judgments in all activities.” (Mintz, p. 19)
The audit committee must certify that the company’s auditors are independent. The audit committee must approve all professional services provided to the company by its independent auditors and ensure that auditors do not provide to the company any of the specifically prohibited services identified by SOX, such as bookkeeping services. The audit committee must receive and analyze key items of information from the independent auditors. These items of information include auditors’ analysis of critical accounting policies adopted by the
According to PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3520 a registered public accounting firm and its associated persons must be independent of the firm's audit client throughout the audit and professional engagement period. Independence is required for all audit engagements. The auditor must be independent of an entity when performing an engagement according to General Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS). Independence is very significant to the audit profession, because the primary purpose of an audit is to provide financial statement users with reasonable assurance an on whether the financial statements are presented fairly. The auditor’s report gives credibility to an entity financial statement and without an auditor’s report the financial statement would be consider worthless. Reliance on management for the fair presentation of a financial statement would often result with a bias and impressive financial statements that doesn’t reflect a true picture of the entity’s financial position. An auditor’s independence should not in anyway be influenced by any relationship between their client and
Section 285 of the Patent Act authorizes district courts to award attorney’s fees to the winning parties in cases deemed “exceptional.” In Brooks Furniture Manufacturing Inc. v Dutailier International Inc. the Federal Circuit Court defined an “exceptional” case as one that either involves “material inappropriate conduct” cite or one that is both “objectively baseless” and “brought in subjective bad faith.” cite
Objectivity also needs to be evaluated to make sure the internal audit is reliable. The internal audit needs to be free of conflicting responsibilities as well
His project manager, Oliver Freeman, changed the analysis. that Daniel submitted in order to get a clear opinion so that their firm may get an exclusive account. The. My decision was to report the incident so that the correct information would be supplied in the audit documents. The decision I chose may cost Baker Greenleaf to lose an important client and Oliver Freeman to lose his job, but it will uphold the integrity of the accounting profession and keep Daniel Potter safe from the liability of providing false information.
Consult a certified public accountant. Even if you plan to be doing everything yourself, it's better to seek outside self-employmen...
The purpose of this essay is analyze the case of IKEA, which has involved in the HR management. Meanwhile, choose two topics to identify the IKEA current situation, including training and development and cross-cultural management. From those two points, give some forward suggestions on the IKEA HR management practice.
Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Custom Woodworking Company Corporate Profile 3 III. Opportunity 4 IV. Project Concepts 5 V. Case Study Proposal 5 VI. Project Processes and Knowledge Areas 6 VII.
Auditors’ motivated blindness. It could be that this conflict of interest is the reason behind Arthur Anderson issuance of an unqualified audit report without questioning or recommending to the audit committee the treatment of the related party transactions (Tonge et al., 2003, p. 15), the appropriate disclosures to make or the reasonable assumptions of mark-to market accounting. Moreover, Andersen admitted it destroyed perhaps thousands of documents and electronic files related to the engagement, in accordance with “firm policy,” supposedly before the SEC issued a subpoena for them (Thomas, 2002).
The oversight responsibilities of the board, the CAE lacking of expertise or broad understanding of financial controls and responsibilities, and the understaffed internal audit functions lacking of independence and direct access to the board of directors contributed to the absence of internal controls. To begin with, the board should be retrained to achieve financial literacy to review financial reporting. Other than attending formal meetings, the board of directors should be more involved with the management. For the Audit Committee, the two members who were recruited as acquaintances to Brennahan need be replaced with experts who are more sufficiently knowledgeable about accounting rules beyond merely “financially literate”. Furthermore, the internal audit functions need to expand with different expertise commensurate with the expanded activities of the organization, testing financial reporting rather than internal controls from an operational perspective. The CAE should be more independent and proactive to execute audit plans, instead of following orders from the CFO, and initiate a direct and efficient communication between internal audit and audit
...e financial reports and statements are correct. This auditing will be conducted by auditing department of the organization, even may be done by an independent auditor who is not part of the organization, and sometimes public officials are elected. In case of unmatched consequences the organization need to give explanation on the misrepresentation of wrong statements. Auditors purpose is then to ensure that the misrepresentations are corrected, then maintain accurate, reliable financial documents and statements.
The evolution of auditing is a complicated history that has always been changing through historical events. Auditing always changed to meet the needs of the business environment of that day. Auditing has been around since the beginning of human civilization, focusing mainly, at first, on finding efraud. As the United States grew, the business world grew, and auditing began to play more important roles. In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, people began to invest money into large corporations. The Stock Market crash of 1929 and various scandals made auditors realize that their roles in society were very important. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed, and became easier with the use of internal controls. These controls introduced the need for testing; not an in-depth detailed audit. Auditing jobs would have to change to meet the changing business world. The invention of computers impacted the auditors’ world by making their job at times easier and at times making their job more difficult. Finally, the auditors’ job of certifying and testing companies’ financial statements is the backbone of the business world.
The audit has three different types, operational audit, compliance audit and financial statement audit. The operational audit is to evaluate whether the firms’ operation procedures and methods are efficiency and effectiveness. Efficiency and effectiveness of operations are more difficult to objectively evaluate than standard. The purpose of a compliance audit is to determine whether the audit is following specific process, regulations. A significant portion of the compliance audit work is employed by the organizational invited auditors by themselves. A financial statement audit is conducted to determine whether the overall financial statements are stated in accordance with specified criteria. Normally, the criteria are generally accepted accounting