Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction on the importance of food
Introduction on the importance of food
Importance of food
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction on the importance of food
Locally grown food is important for many reasons. It’s much healthier; it doesn’t have such a negative impact on the environment, not to mention it helps create a community when you buy locally. When you produce and buy locally grown food it strengthens the local economy, which leads to more success as a community. When a community is successful it leads to a stronger, closer-knit group, and that will lead to success in all types of forms. The majority of the food I ate in a week was from Canada, saying a lot about my habits and me. From my diet I have concluded that Canadians are local consumers more then they are global consumers. I find that most individual’s diets change as summer rolls around, not to mention heritage has a big impact on some individual’s diets and others not so much.
Approximately 90 percent of my food I ate in a week was produced in Canada, this is important for many reasons. My food being produced in Canada tells a lot about me as a consumer. It generally describes my lifestyle, not to mention it can probably tell you about my health choices as an individual. My diet consisting of 90 percent Canadian made food shows that I tend to eat more processed goods and not as much fruit and vegetables. My environment is affecting my eating choices; at the same time my eating choices affect the environment. This is important because my food mostly being produced in Canada means I am supporting the factories, and contributing to the pollution and environmental damage that’s being done, but at the same time I am helping Canada by not having such a big ecological foot print. If I were eating food from half way across the world aspects like how it got here would be considered. That would lead to the food potentially ...
... middle of paper ...
...e food. There is much less risk health and safety wise. Yes there are downfalls to eating local food but the positives over ride them. Locally grown food boosts the economy, not to mention brings everybody closer together, creating a stronger closer-knit community. Food is something everybody will always need, it will always bring people together, so it’s important that its healthy and safe, like locally grown food.
Works Cited
Chris Turner, “The Farms are not alright,” The Walrus, October 2011. http://walrusmagazine.com/articles/2011.10-food-the-farms-are-not-all-right/
Evan Fraser and Andrew Rimas, “How to Feed Nine Billion people,” The Walrus, December 2012. http://thewalrus.ca/how-to-feed-nine-billion/
Sasha Chapman, “Manufacturing Taste: The (un) natural history of Kraft Dinner,” The Walrus, September 2012 http://thewalrus.ca/manufacturing-taste/
In “Called Home”, the first chapter of the book Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year in Food Life, Barbara Kingsolver presents her concerns about America's lack of food knowledge, sustainable practices, and food culture. Kingsolver introduces her argument for the benefits of adopting a local food culture by using statistics, witty anecdotal evidence, and logic to appeal to a wide casual reading audience. Her friendly tone and trenchant criticism of America's current food practices combine to deliver a convincing argument that a food culture would improve conditions concerning health and sustainability. I agree with Kingsolver that knowing the origin of food is an important and healthy benefit of developing a true food culture, but it is impractical to maintain that everyone is able to buy more expensive food. Kingsolver presents a compelling argument for developing a food culture, however this lifestyle change may not be practical or even possible for a poverty-level citizen. The following essay will summarize and respond to Kingsolver’s argument to demonstrate how “Called Home” is a model for novice social scientists.
Reason 1: the locally grown produce’s nutritional value is overall better than unfamiliar produce shipped from foreign countries
Author, Christopher Pelletier, in his essay, “The Locavore’s Dilemma,” shares his point of view on the 100-mile food diet. Pelletier’s purpose is convince us, his readers, that a strictly local diet will not work out but by the end of the article, he brings ideas that could incorporate local eating into today’s consumer market. He also respects his audience, because Pelletier shows his goodwill by expressing his opinions on the topic and not forcing others into thinking his judgement is right.
...led an average of 1,518 miles (about 2,400 kilometers). By contrast, locally sourced food traveled an average of just 44.6 miles (72 kilometers) to Iowa markets. (DeWeerdt)” This is not only bad for the environment with all the food being transported all around the world causing pollution, it also does not support the local growing gardeners. When people buy locally grown produce it helps the community out because of the taxes made from the produce they buy.
The Canadian Food Guide1 is an important health promotion tool, as long as it is adapted to the sociocultural context in which it is used. This is crucial for the First Nations, which are struggling with health problems related to nutrition and whose traditional eating habits must be taken into account2. Drawing deeply into their values and culture, Atikamekw health services have developed their own Food Guide (AFG) in 1998. For ten years, it was the main tool used by health workers to teach basic principles of healthy eating.
Canada’s food system has increasingly changed due to the developing global economy. The rise in technological innovation and an increase in trade has affected Canadian’s choice of food products, ultimately affecting Canadian’s economy. The transnational corporations fail to admit where our food is actually coming from and where it is grown. These global corporations create new forms of production that replace local extraction of food for global production, resulting in higher profits. Purchasing food that was produced in other countries reduces the financial support for Canadians farmers, affecting Canada’s economy.
He states the purpose of the Locavore and details their progress as well as growth in his native Vancouver, British Columbia. Then, very swiftly, Pelletier begins to note the disadvantages to 100-mile food by showing the readers the loss of our beloved coffee bean as well as the barley needed to make delicious, ice cold beer we Westerners are so accustomed to. From this early standpoint, the article continues to list the negative effects as well as our economic losses under a Locavorian society. Pelletier then begins to explore what he feels is the most important issue with our current Agricultural programs: Becoming more efficient and environmentally aware of where and how our foods are grown. He implies that other resources, such as trade and aquaponic gardening, are better, more economically sound alternatives to a total Locavorian way of
B. The purpose of this project is to research the evolution in American cuisine throughout the 1900s, towards a more convenience-based pattern of food consumption. The modernization of the United States, particularly in terms of the workforce, will be examined as it relates to a changing diet. Finally, some effects of these changes will be described.
The ideology of fresher and more local food has been spreading like wildfire acrossing many countries, including the United States. This movement brings many beneficial factors to the table. The locavore movement supports small farms and it allows customer to be in touch with where their food comes from; therefore, the movement provides a better and healthier local economy for the community.
The most important implications for a community considering organizing a locavore movement are the freshness of the fruits and vegetables as well as the promotion of small farmers in the community because buying locally is nutritionally better for you and saves the environment.
Since eating locally grown food is healthier than the food from the supermarket,we should start a locavore movement.Eating local food is one way to become healthier persons r,since food purchased locally is fresher and the most important it have a higher nutritional content (Source A).Also,the government recognized that consuming local food is a essential by deciding to “invest in the health and nutrition of the American children..by expanding their access to farmer’s markets”(Source E).Therefore,living a healthy lifestyle means eating the most nutritious food because nutrition is a vital part to benefit our health.On the contrary,,buying local food in supermarkets that had been on the refrigerator for a
...asing locally grown produces as well as locally produced foods. They persuade people effectively through the use of
Avid supporters of the locavore movement are generally a group of like-minded people with “similar backgrounds, values, and proclivities” and have the wealth necessary to participate in the local food movement (Alkon, Agyemon, 2011). The benefits of the locavore movement are more substantial when the wealth and resources are available, especially considering that farmer’s markets tend to be located within fairly affluent areas (Guthman, 2008). As a result, it is more difficult for low-income families to have access local foods. Furthermore, the cost associated with the consumption of locally grown foods is a limiting factor in the attempt to reduce food insecurity in the United States. For some, it is simply too expensive and time-consuming to purchase and then prepare fresh, local foods, and prepackaged food is more convenient and economically sound. In order for the locavore movement to dramatically impact food insecurity in the United States, it must become more accessible for all of the population, regardless of income level or geographic
Most Americans do not care enough to take a look at the nutritional values of the food that he or she is consuming. That is why America has the highest percentage of obesity in the world. This is a serious problem because one in every three adults is obese, and one in every six children is obese. There are many factors that go into the regular American diet, but most of those factors are not appealing nor is it healthy. Americans put way too much processed food into their daily diet. Some would say that other countries diets superior the American diet because of nutritional values that it carries. Other countries have proven that an active lifestyle is a huge element in the average weight of the country. There are many things that Americans could change about their diets and lifestyle that would help them to become healthier.
It used to be that fine dining establishments featured imported ingredients on the menu. These days, many chefs in high quality restaurants take pride in featuring locally grown, seasonal items. Even some large chain grocery stores now offer meat and produce from local farms. While most Americans probably would not feel the need to be as close to their meat as Makenna Goodman describes in “Ever Wonder if You Could Kill What You Eat? We Did the Other Night”, there is growing support for Goodman’s ideas that being closer to the food results in better food quality (246). Many Americans seem to concur, as they are now willing to pay more for locally grown and organically raised food. Having seen countless local farms plowed under to become housing developments or shopping malls, and having dealt with several epidemics of tainted food, Americans are more conscious of the ‘support your local farmer’ movement. If this new ‘food fashion’ continues to grow in popularity, it will help strengthen local farms that in past years have suffered at the expense of large commercial farming enterprises. According to Michael Pollan federal policy has promoted industrial agriculture, or agribusiness, since the Nixon era in the belief that keeping food costs low by obtaining maximum production of commodity crops (corn, soybeans, wheat, and rice) was in the best interest of the national political agenda (186). In “Farmer in Chief”, Pollan asks President Obama to change federal policy and instead promote local farming, asserting that how Americans grow, process, and eat food impacts the health care crisis, energy independence, and climate change (187). Goodman, Pollan, and others agree that more local, small-scale, farming will be better for th...