This paper will debate advantages and disadvantages of both moral relativism and deontology. I will argue against moral relativism by showing that deontology gives a better account of our moral intuitions than moral relativism. I will use examples from the film The Ballad of Narayam, and James Rachels The Challenge of Cultural Relativism to illustrate why moral relativism should be rejected, and deontology should be accepted.
Moral relativism takes the position that moral and/or ethical propositions do not reflect universal moral standards. Moreover, moral relativism takes the position that moral truths reflect those of social, cultural, and historical circumstances. It is a sociological fact that different societies have different sets of moral rules. Moral relativism is a theoretical view of morality, which states that right and wrong are always relative to a particular culture. For example, moral rules of a specific culture determines that there is no meaning to the words right or wrong other than what the culture dictates as right or wrong. Moral relativism is unique, such that peoples beliefs about right and wrong are relative to their social conditioning, that is, what people determine as truly or morally right depends on what the individual, or society believes to be right. Moral relativism is not absolute, meaning ethical truths depend on variables such as culture, social, or historical circumstances. Thus, a moral realist must even admit truth in the sociological fact that different societies have different sets of moral rules, however, a moral realist must deny that right and wrong are always determined by what the culture dictates as right or wr...
... middle of paper ...
...ause of old age. For that matter, one could argue that children are a burden on their parents, or even take it to a larger level and say that mentally ill, handicapped, or temporarily ill individuals are a burden and should be discarded. Cultures, societies, and beliefs are constantly changing, and thus, there needs to be a universal law that determines codes of ethics and morals.
Deontology provides such an answer. Deontology uses reason, logic, and the categorical imperative to determine what is ethically and morally right. It allows for a universal code to be established, so that changes among cultures, societies, and countries do not impede laws of ethics and morals. Ethics of morals are universal truths. They should not be dependent o the current societal whim. Deontology, unlike moral relativism, focuses on reason and logic, and recognizes universal truths.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Cultural relativism is the term given to the idea that there are no universal moral values that apply to all mankind and that every culture has its own set of moral principles. This set of principles varies from culture to culture, and it is extremely rare, if not totally impossible, to find a moral principle that is followed by all cultures. For example, the idea of arranged marriages, which is the concept of two families marrying their son and daughter even though they don’t particularly know each other, is fairly common in Indian culture but non-existent in American culture.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
1457 words (4.2 pages)
- The world contains a great numbers of different cultures that vary from different countries. Sometimes we found other culture interesting or hard to understand. I believe that moral relativism is a unilateral argument that people who consider this standpoint ignore the fact that there are universal standard and the moral progress happen in the society. Based on culture relativism, there is no definitely right or wrong moral standards which they all depend on different culture or different person.... [tags: Culture, Cultural relativism, Moral relativism]
1167 words (3.3 pages)
- Gilbert Harman lays out his moral relativism theory with “inner judgments”, the statements concerned with “ought”, in Moral Relativism Defended. However, he assumes an important premise of his theory to be true, which is the reason that I will prove the missing premise – that moral relativism is true – in this paper. Moreover, his form of moral relativism with his “four-place predicate ‘Ought(A,D,C,M),’ which relates an agent A, a type of action D, considerations C, and motivating attitudes M,” has brought about both meta-ethical and practical concerns.... [tags: Morality, Moral relativism, Ethics]
1800 words (5.1 pages)
- Assess the merits and pitfalls of cultural relativism in contemporary anthropology. Cultural relativism is a contentious methodological and theoretical stance in anthropology, which advises that cultures should only be contemplated in their own context. This was conceptualised by Franz Boas (Boas, 1904). It rests on the idea that cultures are formed through the accumulative process of enculturation. Each culture has evolved in its own circumstances, thus it cannot be judged from a different framework (Herskovitz, 1955).... [tags: Culture, Cultural relativism]
1829 words (5.2 pages)
- Weigh Prinz’s argument for moral relativism against the anti-relativist arguments put by James Rachel in “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism.” Explain both philosophers cases. Which argument is stronger in your view and why. Defend your answer. From a young age, people question whether they are morally right about things all around them. Have our morals been taught to us from a young age. Do they truly exist are are they a norm imposed to people by society. Does morality really exist or is it just a creation of our imagination.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Cultural relativism]
1470 words (4.2 pages)
- Cultural Relativism is a moral theory which states that due to the vastly differing cultural norms held by people across the globe, morality cannot be judged objectively, and must instead be judged subjectively through the lense of an individuals own cultural norms. Because it is obvious that there are many different beliefs that are held by people around the world, cultural relativism can easily be seen as answer to the question of how to accurately and fairly judge the cultural morality of others, by not doing so at all.... [tags: Culture, Cultural relativism, Morality, Value]
1079 words (3.1 pages)
- Cultural Relativism Cultural Relativism is the theory that ethical and moral standards are based on what a particular society deems to be good or bad. Since different societies have different beliefs, cultural relativists believe there are many moral codes in the world. Cultural relativists believe there is no universal moral code, which is an independent standard that defines what is right or wrong all of the time, regardless of place. There are many different examples of Cultural Relativism in society.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture]
1275 words (3.6 pages)
- There are different countries and cultures in the world, and as being claimed by cultural relativists, there is no such thing as “objective truth in morality” (Rachels, 2012). Cultural relativists are the people who believe in the Cultural Ethical Relativism, which declares that different cultures value different thing so common ethical truth does not exist. However, philosopher James Rachels argues against this theory due to its lack of invalidity and soundness. He introduced his Geographical Differences Argument to point out several mistakes in the CER theory.... [tags: Morality, Culture, Cultural relativism, Logic]
1155 words (3.3 pages)
- Moral relativism is the view that “there is no single true morality. There are many different moral frameworks, none of which is more correct than others.”In this essay, I’m going to evaluate Moral Relativism theory introduced by Gilbert Harman. I will discuss the determinacy and applicability of Moral Relativism. Harman explains that -Various cultures have different beliefs and perceptions about right and wrong and act differently regarding their beliefs. -Moral right and wrong (good and bad, justice and injustice, virtue and vice, etc.) are always relative to a choice of moral framework.... [tags: Morality, Culture, Cultural relativism, Ethics]
790 words (2.3 pages)
- The world is constantly changing. New governments are being formed, land boundaries are changing, and our way of life is being questioned. The common factor in these changes is people. The things that shape ethics in our environment can be viewed in two different ways. There is a belief that some supreme being created life, and a different belief that we exist because of evolution. These different theories deal with morality, more specifically, Ethical Relativism and Ethical Objectivism. A relativist does not have an absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong, and an objectivist claims that some moral rules are correct.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Moral relativism, Religion]
790 words (2.3 pages)
- Differences Between Men and Women
- History of the Ainu Culture in Japan
- Political Correctness and Language
- Qualities of a Hero Illustrated in Homer’s Epic Poem, The Iliad
- Integrity in Characters of Different Literary Works
- Alice Walker’s Women: Oppression and Victory in Everyday Use and The Color Purple