Analysis Of Five Forces Analysis Walgreens

715 Words2 Pages

Applying Industry Five Forces Analysis for Walgreens Earlier on this paper, the industry five forces analysis has been discussed generally. In this part, the paper analyzes Walgreens ' actions based on industry five forces model and suggests the next actions that Walgreens would rather do to maintain and improve its power in each five areas. This section will go into each force of five forces model in the order of priority, including bargaining power of buyers, the threat of substitutes, the degree of rivalry within the industry, the threat of new entrants, and bargaining power of suppliers. Bargaining Power of Buyers. This is the most concerned force because many companies in the drugstore industry start to do the same thing as Walgreens. …show more content…

The substitutes is another big issue for Walgreens. The supermarket like Walmart has been going into drugstore business. As a supermarket, their products and services are wider, and they can provide the lower price due to bigger supplier and distribution network (Baeb, 2001). Currently, Walgreens has been fighting with specific medical services that has been mentioned in value chain section; prevention & wellness, treatment, and monitoring & management. To reduce the threat of substitutes, Walgreens would rather emphasize its business-level strategy. Also, it is better for Walgreens to have functional-level strategy to support its business-level strategy as well. The emphasized strategy from Porter 's generic strategies has been discussed later in this …show more content…

Although this force has the least concern, it might be the key for Walgreens to position itself as the number one pharmacy retailer. Currently, Walgreens cannot rival the overall cost leadership strategy like Walmart. Walgreens has offered the differentiated medical services that customers can find convenience. However, if Walgreens can lower bargaining power of its suppliers, Walgreens would be able to use combination strategy that integrate overall low cost and differentiation together. The combination or hybrid strategy has been proven that can remain successfully better than overall low cost and differentiation strategies alone (Baroto et al.,

Open Document