First of all, animals do not need to be equal or have the same privileges because of their basic needs. There are 3 main necessities: food and water, shelter, and a habitat . Food and water for them to eat and drink, shelter to protect them from predators and bad weather, and a habitat to live in and interact with others (“The Basic Needs of Animals”). Considering the fact animals’ sole purpose in life is to survive and continue their species, certain liberties are of no concern to these creatures and would be wasted on them: the right to drive, the right to vote, the freedom to walk through streets without leashes, and the freedom to eat whatever they like. So of course, it would be unrealistic to say animals are equal to humans when more than half of what humans do does not matter to them.
What most animal rights activists would say is animals should not be discounted for their intelli...
... middle of paper ...
...Web. 25 Mar. 2011.
Katz, Jon. "Animals Need Better Care, Not Equal Rights." Slate (5 Mar. 2004). Rpt. in The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 25 Mar. 2011.
Kobilnyk, Andrey. “Do Animals Have Rights?” First Science. 1 Oct. 2007. Web.26 Jan. 2011.
Stiver, Randy. "God Did Not Make Animals the Moral Equivalent of Humans." The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 7 Mar. 2011.
Thorpe, Joey. Personal Interview. 31 Jan. 2011.
Will, George F. "U.K. Pets Get 'Freedoms'; Humans need freedom from government supervision of all dealings between people, or between people and tropical fish." Newsweek 13 Feb. 2006: 72. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 25 Mar. 2011.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Animals and Humans Are Not Equal "Franklin was a vegetarian in his youth, 'believing that killing animals was "a kind of unprovok'd Murder." Later, however, Franklin 'was tempted by the smell of fish being fried. Having seen small fish in the stomachs of fish being prepared, he decided he could eat them if they ate each other." If animals eat other animals to sustain life, animals must be an excellent source of food. Meat contains many vitamins. Animals will have rights when they have the means to enforce them.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Essays]
1101 words (3.1 pages)
- ... Even when narrowing the groups down, there is a difference in rights between people themselves, such as needing a right to abortions for men. What we consider basic human rights, such as health and happiness, vary vastly based on geography - rights in the US are different from Africa, which are different from China, and so on. The current concept of equal rights is determined based on context, and not universality. Singer’s principle argument is that all humans are equal. Current events and even a simple observation of people show that all people are not equal, in it’s purest sense.... [tags: Law, Human, Animal rights, Rights]
1138 words (3.3 pages)
- ... This means that every being can suffer, therefore there is no excuse for the suffering to not be taken into account. Even if the suffering is different, it does not change the fact that it is suffering. He adds that an object that cannot suffer or have any feeling whatsoever, is not included. This may mean that an object that is not living cannot be compared to an animal. In addition, Singer recognizes that it is better for scientists to experiment on animals than on humans. He says, “Normal adult human beings have mental capacities that will, in certain circumstances, lead them to suffer more than animals would in the same circumstances” (Singer, 59).... [tags: equality between humans and animals]
1301 words (3.7 pages)
- For many years there has been controversy whether or not animals should be tested on between scientists and animal right supporters. It is very debatable if animals should be tested on when a cure for a disease could be found from testing on animals. From my own personal view I have a huge heart for animals, but if we can not find other alternatives, and is possible we can find cures for diseases, then animals may be used for research, but only for medical reasons. Animal right supporters believe that animals and humans are equal, and therefore should be treated equally.... [tags: Animal testing, Medical research, Human]
1575 words (4.5 pages)
- ... A human might not always be considered a person, but they are always considered an animal no matter what. Olson states that even though we may not believe we are entirely animals or more than simply an animal, it still doesn’t rule out that we are animals. Olson tries to convince us by giving a simple example, if a philosopher that considers themselves a mathematician is from France and a Catholic; these extra characteristics do not rule out that the person is still a philosopher. He also states that if we are not animals then what are we, though we may be the only species to have thoughts and a spirit we are only considered to be another type of animal.... [tags: Human, Thought, Mammal, Meaning of life]
1460 words (4.2 pages)
- There has always been a cruelty free presence in the product industry, but it appears that there are more companies transitioning from non-cruelty free to cruelty free. The change has taken a few years to finally come into full effect. While there are companies doing the transition to become animal friendly, there are just as many companies that refuse to cooperate and change their production. Not only does the product industry use animals to test human products on but the scientific community does so as well.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
1698 words (4.9 pages)
- In his paper “All Animals Are Equal”, Philosopher Peter Singer argues for an egalitarian view on the concept treatment for animals. This paper will explore the implications of his argument and seek to counter an objection one may have to his view. His argument bases itself in the basic principle of equality. The argument is that the basic principle of equality states that the interest of all being must be taken into account and considered as equal to all other beings To defend his position Singer cites the basic principle of equality as a way to show why in-egalitarian views that are morally wrong can be explained as morally wrong.... [tags: Human, Morality, Ethics, Utilitarianism]
738 words (2.1 pages)
- Dr. Tom Regan, an American philosopher who specializes in animal rights theory, said “To treat human beings in ways that do not honor their independent value is to violate the most basic of human rights: the right of each person to be treated with respect” (Regan). When it comes to what we deserve, ethics and fairness lie along the same line. To be fair is to be ethical and just. To be just means to look out for the common interests of all people and to impart the upmost levels of respect. When the topic of justice is mentioned it almost always relates to humans, but what about animals.... [tags: ethics, fair, moral]
1490 words (4.3 pages)
- G.W. Leibniz asserts that humans are superior to all other creatures. Admittedly, Leibniz’s ideas on this matter are somewhat ambiguous, making it difficult to ascertain his exact position. In some instances within the Discourse on Metaphysics, he appears to hold that animals do not have souls. On other occasions, however, he seems to express beliefs to the contrary. For example, Leibniz first expresses doubt about souls of animals when he questions “if they [animals] have any [souls]” (Leibniz, 11).... [tags: Analysis, G.W. Leibniz]
1638 words (4.7 pages)
- We all studied the extinction of dinosaurs in middle school. We know that, two hundred fifty million years ago, more than 90% of the planet species became extinct. There have been five major mass extinctions during the life history of planet earth. Scientists now agree that we are experiencing a sixth major extinction. The big difference between the older events and now is, “unlike earlier extinctions, this one results from the work of a single species, Homo sapiens. We are relentlessly taking over the planet, laying it to waste and eliminating most of our fellow species” (Coyne 1).... [tags: Environment, Natural Disasters, Extinction]
801 words (2.3 pages)