First of all, animals do not need to be equal or have the same privileges because of their basic needs. There are 3 main necessities: food and water, shelter, and a habitat . Food and water for them to eat and drink, shelter to protect them from predators and bad weather, and a habitat to live in and interact with others (“The Basic Needs of Animals”). Considering the fact animals’ sole purpose in life is to survive and continue their species, certain liberties are of no concern to these creatures and would be wasted on them: the right to drive, the right to vote, the freedom to walk through streets without leashes, and the freedom to eat whatever they like. So of course, it would be unrealistic to say animals are equal to humans when more than half of what humans do does not matter to them.
What most animal rights activists would say is animals should not be discounted for their intelli...
... middle of paper ...
...Web. 25 Mar. 2011.
Katz, Jon. "Animals Need Better Care, Not Equal Rights." Slate (5 Mar. 2004). Rpt. in The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 25 Mar. 2011.
Kobilnyk, Andrey. “Do Animals Have Rights?” First Science. 1 Oct. 2007. Web.26 Jan. 2011.
Stiver, Randy. "God Did Not Make Animals the Moral Equivalent of Humans." The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 7 Mar. 2011.
Thorpe, Joey. Personal Interview. 31 Jan. 2011.
Will, George F. "U.K. Pets Get 'Freedoms'; Humans need freedom from government supervision of all dealings between people, or between people and tropical fish." Newsweek 13 Feb. 2006: 72. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 25 Mar. 2011.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Animals and Humans Are Not Equal "Franklin was a vegetarian in his youth, 'believing that killing animals was "a kind of unprovok'd Murder." Later, however, Franklin 'was tempted by the smell of fish being fried. Having seen small fish in the stomachs of fish being prepared, he decided he could eat them if they ate each other." If animals eat other animals to sustain life, animals must be an excellent source of food. Meat contains many vitamins. Animals will have rights when they have the means to enforce them.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Essays]
1101 words (3.1 pages)
- “The state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities.” These 11 words are the most basic definition of equality. This all-encompassing ideal has been redefined as many times as generations which have fought for it, and thus, teaching us that equality is and ever-evolving ideal. From suffrage and women’s rights to civil rights, freedom of speech, property rights, health equality, economic equality, and social equality, have been in a constant state of evolution, being redefined by each group, and while we as a society constantly work towards more equal terms, one group has remained almost regularly marginalized - the diversity of animal life with which we are surrounded.... [tags: Law, Human, Animal rights, Rights]
1138 words (3.3 pages)
- Animals have been seen by humans as many different things, including a source of companionship, work, and food. There are opposing ethicists’ views regarding how people are morally obligated to treat animals, giving different definitions of right and wrong with specific groups of animals, including both domestic and wild (Sander-Staudt, n.d.). Even though some believe that wild animals are worthy of lesser treatment, many still fight for all animals to be treated the same (Sander-Staudt, n.d). Animals deserve equal treatment because they can think similarly to humans, they have a comparable ability to communicate, and they suffer like we do.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Human, Religion]
704 words (2 pages)
- ... This means that every being can suffer, therefore there is no excuse for the suffering to not be taken into account. Even if the suffering is different, it does not change the fact that it is suffering. He adds that an object that cannot suffer or have any feeling whatsoever, is not included. This may mean that an object that is not living cannot be compared to an animal. In addition, Singer recognizes that it is better for scientists to experiment on animals than on humans. He says, “Normal adult human beings have mental capacities that will, in certain circumstances, lead them to suffer more than animals would in the same circumstances” (Singer, 59).... [tags: equality between humans and animals]
1301 words (3.7 pages)
- For many years there has been controversy whether or not animals should be tested on between scientists and animal right supporters. It is very debatable if animals should be tested on when a cure for a disease could be found from testing on animals. From my own personal view I have a huge heart for animals, but if we can not find other alternatives, and is possible we can find cures for diseases, then animals may be used for research, but only for medical reasons. Animal right supporters believe that animals and humans are equal, and therefore should be treated equally.... [tags: Animal testing, Medical research, Human]
1575 words (4.5 pages)
- Animalism is about what it means to be a person, it touches upon personal identity in human beings in a biological sense. Simply put, animalism is the theory that living humans are animals, that we lack morality, spirituality and intellectuality and are only motivated by sensual or physical forces. In Olson’s argument for animalism he states that it isn’t obvious that we are animals, but proves that we are considered a kind of animal, that can be identified by our body. He thinks that even though we are not identical to an animal, we are still considered to be animals, just a different species.... [tags: Human, Thought, Mammal, Meaning of life]
1460 words (4.2 pages)
- There has always been a cruelty free presence in the product industry, but it appears that there are more companies transitioning from non-cruelty free to cruelty free. The change has taken a few years to finally come into full effect. While there are companies doing the transition to become animal friendly, there are just as many companies that refuse to cooperate and change their production. Not only does the product industry use animals to test human products on but the scientific community does so as well.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
1698 words (4.9 pages)
- In his paper “All Animals Are Equal”, Philosopher Peter Singer argues for an egalitarian view on the concept treatment for animals. This paper will explore the implications of his argument and seek to counter an objection one may have to his view. His argument bases itself in the basic principle of equality. The argument is that the basic principle of equality states that the interest of all being must be taken into account and considered as equal to all other beings To defend his position Singer cites the basic principle of equality as a way to show why in-egalitarian views that are morally wrong can be explained as morally wrong.... [tags: Human, Morality, Ethics, Utilitarianism]
738 words (2.1 pages)
- G.W. Leibniz asserts that humans are superior to all other creatures. Admittedly, Leibniz’s ideas on this matter are somewhat ambiguous, making it difficult to ascertain his exact position. In some instances within the Discourse on Metaphysics, he appears to hold that animals do not have souls. On other occasions, however, he seems to express beliefs to the contrary. For example, Leibniz first expresses doubt about souls of animals when he questions “if they [animals] have any [souls]” (Leibniz, 11).... [tags: Analysis, G.W. Leibniz]
1638 words (4.7 pages)
- We all studied the extinction of dinosaurs in middle school. We know that, two hundred fifty million years ago, more than 90% of the planet species became extinct. There have been five major mass extinctions during the life history of planet earth. Scientists now agree that we are experiencing a sixth major extinction. The big difference between the older events and now is, “unlike earlier extinctions, this one results from the work of a single species, Homo sapiens. We are relentlessly taking over the planet, laying it to waste and eliminating most of our fellow species” (Coyne 1).... [tags: Environment, Natural Disasters, Extinction]
801 words (2.3 pages)