More handpicked essays just for you.
Do animals have rights arguments and debates
Argumentative essays on animal rights
Argumentative essays on animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
With the increasing number of researches increasing to take place for different purposes including industrial and health purposes, animal testing is also increasing
in number. Many non governmental organisation are against animal testing and this has caused a very large impact on the opinion the society used to have
towards animal testing. This has caused different people to have different personal views on animal testing. Recent studies show that about 20 million animals
are being killed as they are used in animal testing (Andre &ump; Velasquez, n.d.). While there are some who are against animal testing, some companies especially
companies producing drugs for medical supply continue to use animals to test their products. Issue of counting
…show more content…
Negative effects of animal testing on the environment
includes the incompability of the human body with animals, high costs are involved in carrying out animals testing and the matter of safety also needs to be
considered too.
1.5 Scope of Research
Therefore, this report will focus on what are the negative impacts of animal testing on the society, bas on the thesis statement above. This research will
investigate in further what are the negative impacts of animal testing on the society with examples as well as taking into consideration all the arguments which
support animal testing to have a better understanding of this issue entirely.
2.0 Body of content
2.1 Incompability of the human body to animals
First and foremost, one of the conflicts made against animal testing is regarding the incompability of the human body to animals. This can vary in
many different ways. Animals and humans have a totally different system although humans and most animals come under the clssification on being
…show more content…
On the other hand, there are those who claims that animal testing have advantages that can benefit the society. Those who supports animal testing
claims that animal testing helps ensure safety of the drugs that are being produced in the medical industry. It is believed that the purpose of animal testing is to
ensure that all drugs are not harmful to be consumed or used by humans (Murnaghan, 2013). Hence, it improves the wuality of a human 's life. However, in a
much bigger picture, animal testing is very harmful towards the animals themselves. Some drugs are poisonous and this might cause death of the animals
(Murnaghan, 2013). There are two types of drugs that can cause death. One that is too strong for the animal to take in and another type is where the drug kills
the animal slowly. A very recent case is that, to test carcinogen substances, animals are being tested for two years in a daily basis. This can cause infection in the
animal 's lungs and it might cause death. Another case that has been revealed lately is that, a lot of these animal testing involve killing pregnant animals and
These animals used for testing products commonly include mice, rats, rabbits, monkeys, hamsters, guinea pigs, dogs and cats. These animals are forced to test new products before they are sold to humans, and even though there are numerous valid substitutes for us to test products on, the law doesn’t require that we do. What’s even more horrifying is that no animal experiment is illegal, and therefore these ‘tests’ can be completely irrelevant to human health, and no matter how painful or cruel the test may be to animals it is completely legal. Some companies that test their products on animals include Almay, Johnson & Johnson, Clearasil, Axe, Lancôme (owned by L’Oréal), and Pantene (owned by Procter & Gamble).
SUMMARIZE: The article focuses on studies related to anesthesia which were conducted on dogs by researchers. Topics discussed include Arthur Guedel anesthetizing a dog using tracheal tube and cocaine crystals numbing cornea. It also goes on to talk about the numbing of Nazi dogs by Jews using cocaine. Also the use of curare by a surgeon named Mario Jascalevich which resulted in a neuronal cell death. Numerous stories on chemicals tested on animals, preferably dogs and facts were presented. (78
...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.
Although the opposing sides may agree on most of the regulations that are set, they also disagree on many other subjects. These subjects include whether the tests lead to medical breakthroughs or not and whether or not they are ethical. Lastly, there may be laws to help reduce animal testing, but as long as it is still being done, there will continue to be controversy on the subject.
One word comes to mind when I think of animal testing: cruel. Animal testing has been a subject of debate for many years. While most people think that using animals to test products is a reasonable approach, in reality the outcome does not always show how the products will react on humans, and the animals suffer unnecessarily. The United States needs to ban all animal testing like the European Union did because testing on animals is cruel and animals should not be dying from it.
companies must not be able to test on animals without knowing that the product will be successful. Scientists and researchers use animals to test human products on. Animal testing is harmful and ineffective for humans.
In many parts of the world, animals are being used in laboratories are still suffering and dying to test cosmetics. In
Animal Testing is one of the most horrible things you could do to an animal. When an animal is tested you could cause it to become crippled for the rest of its life whether they make it blind or even making it to become paralyzed you could even cause extreme pain or death.
Hundreds and millions of animals are killed everyday due to animal testing. The number of animal deaths in labs have halved since the 1970’s. An animal dies in a Canadian lab every 16 seconds! The contemporary scale of animal deaths due to animal testing is unacceptable! 17-22 million animals are tested on each year and at least half are put to death.
Testing animals is wrong and they are just poor helpless animals and they die every day. They are testing animals with products such as soap, household cleaners, drugs, cosmetics, pesticides and other chemicals. Drug tests that are done on animals that pass the test end up harming or killing humans. Lists of animals that get tested daily are cats, dogs, monkeys, mice, and rabbits. The researchers tested these animals with cleaners to see how it would affect them....
First and foremost, one of the conflicts made against animal testing is regarding the incompability of the human body to animals. This can vary in
Now，animal testing is still a controversial subject, and the scientists are facing an increasing problem, which more and more people appeal to stop animal testing. The original purpose of animal testing was inventing drugs for human diseases. For example, Scutti (2013) states that 98 of Nobel Prizes awarded for Physiology or Medicine, 75 were directly dependent on research from animals. The four non-animal experiment prize winners were also relied on the data, which obtained from other animal research groups. However, as people think about animal rights, and the news that animals are suffering in the experiment, people began to consider to stop all animal testing. The animal testing should be not be banned,
Our case is that if we don’t test on animals then progress in scientific fields would be halted. As first speaker for the negative I will speak about the benefits of animal testing in general and then I’ll talk in detail about animal testing in medicine. My second speaker will talk about the opinions on testing and the food chain and my third speaker will summarise our points and rebut.
For many years now, animals have been used for testing and experimentation. Many organizations like PETA and the ARF (Animal Rescue Foundation) strongly oppose the topic of animals being experimented on. Many people are against animal testing as a whole because not only does it harm animals, but many times they may be killed. There have been many countless years and protests against testing, and they deserved to be heard and listened to. People have begun to realize that not only does animal testing harm and kill animals every year; it has been pretty much useless.
A large issue is animal testing. “More than 25 million vertebrate animals are used in testing in the United States each year. When invertebrate animals are thrown into the mix, the estimated number rises to as high as 100 million.”(dosomething) The laboratory testing of animals is important to biomedical research, product safety testing, and education. Biomedical researchers use animals to extend their understanding of the workings of the body and the processes of disease and health, and to develop new vaccines and treatments for various diseases for humans and other animals. However, the morality, the necessity, or the validity of the studies are questionable. Thousands of animals are helplessly killed every year that animal testing is being conducted. “Ninety-four percent of animal testing is done to determine the safety of cosmetics and household products leaving only 6% for medical research” (about my planet). This can cause harm to the animals and may in turn be fatal. It is not fair nor is it humane to conduct experiments on animals to make sure a product or procedure is safe for us. There are no reasons to regard an animal’s life as if it is insignificant in contrast to a human life. During the testing, animals may be force fed or put in restraints in order for the scientists to get the product into their systems. Ani...