The relationship between humans and animals has been a controversial and heated debate for decades. Many people have joined animal rights movements to advocate for the fair treatment of animals. Animals have no syntax and so there is no way to accurately communicate with them. Because of that there is currently no proof if animals can feel the same level of emotions as humans. Peter Singer is a supporter of animal rights. In his essay “Animal Liberation” he talks about what animals can feel. Singer, like many others, believe that animals can feel deeper levels of emotions like humans. Peggy Carlson wants to put an end to animal testing, her and many others believe that animal testing is inhumane and ineffective. If animals can suffer as much as humans than animal testing seems like a horrific practice. I mostly agree with Singer and Carlson on this topic. I think that different animals have different levels of emotional complexity, some animals simply experience primal instincts and others feel emotions closer to or at a human level. With that taken into consideration I think that animal testing is justified, but some of it is unnecessary and cruel.
Examining animal behaviors and the scientific research done on the topic it is evident that many animals can experience the same level of emotions as humans. In Radiolab’s “Animal Minds” episode a scientist studying spindle cells was interviewed. Spindle cells are a type of cell in the brain that is linked to deeper levels of emotions in humans. There was a discovery that many animals also had this type of cell in their brains, indicating the possibility that they experience the same level of emotions as humans. To me this seems ...
... middle of paper ...
...scientists did experiments on the inmates of concentration camps. They made breakthroughs in hypothermia treatment, at the expense of hundreds of unwilling humans being frozen. Many suffered through multiple experiments, and many died. The hypothermia testing could be considered humane compared to the other experiments they ran on masses of prisoners. When the suffering caused is taken into account some scientists outright refuse to even acknowledge what the Nazi scientists learned. The testing done on the concentration camp inmates is considered to be one of the most atrocious events in history. If it was proven that animals can experience suffering on the same level of humans then testing would have to stop. But that would cause scientific advancements in various fields to come to a stop. Temporarily of course, there is always a solution. We just need to find one.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Is it right for us to test on innocent animals just for our human gain. The ethical issues of testing products and other needs on animals are many but when it comes down to if it is ethical, testing on animals is not ethical by any means. Animal testing is a wrongful act that causes pain on innocent animals that have no say or rights in order to stop this. Animal testing is a growing concern because who is to say that these companies and corporations get tired or see new opportunities on testing their products in humans.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1491 words (4.3 pages)
- Animal testing is a very serious issue. It began in the 17th century and the problem has progressed ever since. You would think that the amount of animals being used for testing would have lead to a huge remarkable discovery, but in reality it has only lead us to ineffective experiment, unprofitable funding, and the coast of many lives of innocent animals. What most people don’t know is that more than half of the experiment conducted on animals are unreliable. Now you may be thinking well every experiment has its flaws.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
881 words (2.5 pages)
- Is testing drugs, cosmetics, and other products on animals morally wrong. Animal testing has been an ongoing argument for quite some time. An estimated 26 million animals are used for testing and research each year. Many think it is inhumane and vile. While others consider it a part of natural biology. Animal testing is wasting precious life; it is inhumane and should be stopped. In some cases, the animal tests don’t comply with what will work for a human being, and there are other ways to test products in ways that do not hurt an animal and are also much cheaper.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Human]
1416 words (4 pages)
- There are nearly 26 million animals in the United States who are tested for commercial and scientific use. The AWA- Animal Welfare Act- provides limitations on which animals institutions and scientists can use. Since 1850, the AWA protected about 1,134,693 animals, but has left about 25 million other animals to be scientifically and commercially used. The fact that there are about 25 million animal species not protected by the AWA has many people against animal testing. The AWA sets minimum housing standards and also requires regular inspections by veterinarians.... [tags: ethical issues, animal welfare]
1260 words (3.6 pages)
- Experiment On non-Human Animal Laboratory experimentation of animals has been a hot topic of debate for decades. Advocates of animal’s rights think that it can never be justified because it brings sufferings to animals. They equate animal experimentation to torture. On the other hand there are those who think that humanity should have no qualms about using nature for their own ends. There are more shades of opinion in between and they are frequently reflected in debates over this emotionally and ethically charged topic.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1152 words (3.3 pages)
- The question of whether or not animals ought to have rights, is perhaps one of the most hotly debated topics in the contemporary society. Many people widely regard animals as sentient creatures that do not have rights of their own. Such a notion has led to the increasing objectification of animals as human property. Consequently, animals are often utilized as service providers to human beings. However, an increasing number of people believe that animals are entitled to rights, which are equivalent to those accorded to human beings.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing, Biology]
975 words (2.8 pages)
- Every year thousands of mice, dogs, primates and other animals are victims of vivisection all over the world. These experiments are inhumane, ineffective, and absolutely pointless when there are alternate testing methods. These animals undergo painful suffering, and sometimes death as a result of scientific research into the effects of drugs, cosmetics, food additives, and other chemical products. Animal testing is an act of barbarism, the fact that animals are being bred to be a victim of crude experiments and then euthanized is cruel.... [tags: experiments, abuse, medicine]
898 words (2.6 pages)
- ... Animals that are unbecomingly placed in laboratories are treated more so as disposable equipment rather than living and breathing creatures. There is no limit to the experimentation on one animal’s body. Visualize being a hospitalized patient or a prisoner for life, this comparison is only a partial imagination of what an innocent animal in experimentation laboratories experience daily. The pain and torture an institutionalized animal endures is beyond what any person can visualize. While testing a substance during experimentation, the animal is usually exposed to a household chemical, an industrial chemical, a cosmetic ingredient, or a pharmaceutical product by being forced to eat it, b... [tags: animal abuse and exploitation, lab animals]
1434 words (4.1 pages)
- What animals endure in laboratories is horrific and sickening. Animals should not have to suffer this much for unreliable experiments. They are not lab equipment that can just be thrown away. Animals are still living beings and deserve to at least live out their life. Activists of animal experimentation say that most experiments are not painful to animals, which is far from true. There is no law restricting the use of animals for experimentation. The only law today governing cruelty of animals is the Animal Welfare Act.... [tags: social issues, inhumane experiments]
877 words (2.5 pages)
- “Sometimes a law is just on its face and unjust in its application” (Martin Luther King Jr. 383). These words written by Martin Luther King Jr. seem understandable and easy to process on their own, but what the understanding all boils down to is exactly which laws can the concept of the quote be applied to. At this point, I would provide you with an approximate number of federal laws in the United States but nobody has that many fingers. As many as there are, every law in the United States is applied to a certain group of individuals or a specific activity that must follow a set of rules established by the law.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, The Animals]
1509 words (4.3 pages)