Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay introduction on andrew jackson
Essay introduction on andrew jackson
Essay introduction on andrew jackson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Andrew Jackson: Good or Bad? Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States and was one of the most controversial presidents ever. Jackson initially gained national fame through his role in the War of 1812, where he led a victory over the British at the Battle of New Orleans. Three year laters, Jackson invaded the Spanish-Florida territory which directed to the Adams-Onis Treaty. Although Andrew Jackson proved to be a great military strategist, his unneeded hostility, which was brought out in the Spoils System, the Indian Removal Act, and the ongoing feud with the National Bank, ultimately classify him as poor president. Jackson’s spoils system opened government positions to only his supporters and he had little tolerance for …show more content…
The Indian Removal Act was passed by Congress in order to allow the growth of the United States to continue without the interference of the Native Americans. Jackson believed that the Native Americans were inferior to white settlers and wanted to force them west of the Mississippi. He believed that the United States would not expand past that boundary, so the Native Americans could govern themselves. Jackson evicted thousands of Native Americans from their homes in Georgia and the Carolinas and even disregarded the Supreme Court’s authority and initiated his plan of forcing the Natives’ on the trail of tears. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Indians, however Jackson ignored the ruling and continued with his plan. The result of the Indian Removal Act was that many tribes were tricked or forced off their lands, if they refused to go willingly, resulting in many deaths from skirmishes with soldiers as well as from starvation and disease. The Cherokee in particular were forced to undergo a forced march that became known as the Trail of …show more content…
In the summer of 1832 and Congress renewed the Bank’s charter even though it wasn’t due until 1836. Jackson hesitated to approve of the charter, so Henry Clay and Nicholas Biddle went on the offensive to attempt to persuade Jackson to pass the bill. Jackson, having had his opinion on the banks cemented by Clay’s presence in the organization, then committed to de-establishing the Second National Bank. He waged war against Biddle in particular to make sure Biddle lost power. He vetoed the bank bill, and after winning the race to be reelected, he closed Biddle’s bank. He ordered his Secretary of the Treasury to move money from the Second National Bank to smaller, state banks. When Congress returned from its summer recess, it censured him for his actions. In 1836, Bank of US was dead, and the new democratic-congressmen expunged Jackson’s censure. Because Jackson had no formal plan for managing the nation’s funds after the Second National Bank closed, it caused problems in Van Buren’s administration. He destroyed the Bank of the United States, in the main, for personal reasons. Jackson hated the bank before his presidency because as a wealthy land and slave owner he had lost money due to its fiscal policies. He believed that Congress had no right under the constitution to charter a
Throughout Jackson's two terms as President, Jackson used his power unjustly. As a man from the Frontier State of Tennessee and a leader in the Indian wars, Jackson loathed the Native Americans. Keeping with consistency, Jackson found a way to use his power incorrectly to eliminate the Native Americans. In May 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act. This act required all tribes east of the Mississippi River to leave their lands and travel to reservations in the Oklahoma Territory on the Great Plains. This was done because of the pressure of white settlers who wanted to take over the lands on which the Indians had lived. The white settlers were already emigrating to the Union, or America. The East Coast was burdened with new settlers and becoming vastly populated. President Andrew Jackson and the government had to find a way to move people to the West to make room. In 1830, a new state law said that the Cherokees would be under the jurisdiction of state rather than federal law. This meant that the Indians now had little, if any, protection against the white settlers that desired their land. However, when the Cherokees brought their case to the Supreme Court, they were told that they could not sue on the basis that they were not a foreign nation. In 1832, though, on appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokees were a "domestic dependent nation," and therefore, eligible to receive federal protection against the state. However, Jackson essentially overruled the decision. By this, Jackson implied that he had more power than anyone else did and he could enforce the bill himself. This is yet another way in which Jackson abused his presidential power in order to produce a favorable result that complied with his own beliefs. The Indian Removal Act forced all Indians tribes be moved west of the Mississippi River. The Choctaw was the first tribe to leave from the southeast.
... the unwilling tribes west of the Mississippi. In Jackson’s letter to General John Coffee on April 7, 1832, he explained that the Cherokees were still in Georgia, and that they ought to leave for their own benefit because destruction will come upon them if they stay. By 1835, most eastern tribes had unwillingly complied and moved west. The Bureau of Indian Affairs was created in 1836 to help out the resettled tribes. Most Cherokees rejected the settlement of 1835, which provided land in the Indian territory. It was not until 1838, after Jackson had left office, that the U.S. Army forced 15,000 Cherokees to leave Georgia. The hardships on the “trail of tears” were so great that over 4,000 Cherokees died on their heartbreaking westward journey. In conclusion, the above statement is valid and true. The decision the Jackson administration made to remove the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River was a reformulation of the national policy. Jackson, along with past Presidents George Washington, James Monroe, and Thomas Jefferson, tried to rid the south of Indians This process of removing the native people was continuous as the years went on.
Andrew Jackson, the most controversial president out of the 7 so far. The Era of Jackson was the most eventful and significant Era. Many people wonder if electing Jackson was a mistake and others think that he is the best president yet. I think Jackson should be impeached because of abusing his powers, killing the Cherokee Indians on the Trail of Tears, and for taking down the national
Was Andrew Jackson great as everyone thinks? Andrew Jackson was born in the back woods settlements in the Carolinas in 1769. He was born to Elizabeth Jackson, who came from Ireland. It is said that she was traveling across the Appalachian mountain after she was done burying Andrew Jacksons father when she had him. That is why Andrew Jackson exact location was unknown. Also he had two brother named Hugh, and Robert. Andrew Jackson was not very well educated he had an education that was not as regular as the other kids. Andrew Jackson joined the local militia when he was only thirteen years of age. He was the courier in the revolutionary war. Later on during the war his brother Hugh died in battle in 1779. After that both Andrew and his brother were captured by the British. Later they were released by the British, then later his brother Robert died. After he had been released from the British his mother died from a disease called cholera. Then, he became an orphan at the age of fourteen. His uncle took him in and raised him. Then, when he became in his teens Andrew Jackson he picked up the passion for being a lawyer. So he started to read law books, and educate him self about being a lawyer. He became a very young lawyer in Tennessee, and he was very good at what he did. in 1796 he was elected the first representative in the U.S house of representative from Tennessee. The next year, in 1797, Andrew Jackson was elected to have a chair in the senate, but then he resigned after eight moths later. In 1998, was also elected to be a judge of the Tennessee supreme court, and was only in that position for six years. In 1804, he bought an expensive land that had a plantation, and his mansion which was nicknamed “the hermitage”. He had gro...
Right off the bat, Jackson wasted no time in making his first unconvincing decision as president. Jackson’s first action as president was to instill his own format of government. The style of government Jackson favored was the “Spoils System”. In this system, Jackson initially fired seasoned and experienced government workers, only to hire his friends. As the president of a large country, such as the Untied States, the president’s goal should be to assist the entire nation, not just his friends. Jackson only benefitted his companions in this system by bringing them in as people unfamiliar with the duties of a government official. Despite it only being the very beginning of Jackson’s presidency, he had hastily instituted a poor and inexperienced government that could sacrifice the well being of the nation.
In American history many acts of cruelty and or unjustified beliefs were acted upon. Some of these events were led by citizens and in some cases, such as the case of Andrew Jackson, led by presidents. Andrew Jackson was the seventh president of the United States of America from 1829-1837.1 His presidency and policies, such as the Indian Removal Act, and his part in The Second Bank of the U.S and South Carolina’s Tariff, will be remembered for years. They consisted of such personal opinion and were so controversial few will ever forget.
From what I have learned from President Andrew Jackson’s administration, i have come to the conclusion that the three words I would chose to describe Jackson’s presidency are: hostile, chaotic, and failure. Andrew Jackson was the 7th president from Tennessee, a short tempered person, and under his presidency many events occurred such as the Nullification Crisis & States’ Right Doctrine, the Indian Removal Act of 1830, the Second Bank of the United States, Worcester vs. Georgia, and Trail of Tears which all affected his career and reputation in a negative way. To begin with, The Indian Removal Act of 1830 is an great example of evidence since the Natives were only given two options: to either adopt white culture and become a U.S. citizen or
An example is that Jackson's presidency marked the beginning to the ascendancy of the "spoils system" in American politics. As President, he initiated sweeping removals among high-ranking government officials—Washington bureau chiefs, land and customs officers, and federal marshals and attorneys for his own gain. Jackson claimed to be purging the corruption, \ and arrogance that came with long tenure, and restoring the opportunity for government service to the citizenry at large through "rotation in office." Many offices were distributed out as rewards for political services. Newspaper editors, who had championed Jackson's cause, came in for special favor. An old army comrade and political sycophant named Samuel Swartwout was his most appalling appointee. Against all advice, Jackson made him collector of the New York City customhouse, where the government collected nearly half its annual revenue. Swartwout absconded with more than one million dollars in the year of 1838, an astounding amount for that day. The end result was that Jackson was surrounded in the government by people he knew liked him as their president; they all trusted him and he trusted
One of the finest military heroes during the War of 1812, and an independent and diligent man, Andrew Jackson left a permanent influence upon American politics and presidency after he sworn in as the seventh President of the United States on March 4th, 1829. Within the eight years of presidency, Jackson engendered a potent and corrupt political party, which was composed of his supporters during the election of 1828. Consequently, his provocative and controversial behavior in office aroused his adversaries to organize the Whig party, which strongly opposed Jackson’s economic, political, and social views during his presidency. Since Jackson and the Congress did not agree with each other’s views quite often, his drive for synthesizing political
From serving in the Revolutionary War and getting captured with his brother and becoming orphaned at such a young age, to becoming our nation’s seventh president and being loved by so many, his legacy will live on. “The Age of Jackson” helped shape the national agenda that we lacked and also fix our American policies that we did not enforce. From believing that the president’s authority was derived by the people and made it for the people and by the people, started the idea of the spoils system, and started the power to veto, he made a tremendous impact on our society today that you would have to see it to believe it. Jackson is a very historical
There is a pattern with malevolent tyrants in history. They cast themselves as the ”Champion of the People”. They fight for what they say is the betterment of the country for the people. Leaders like Adolf Hitler and Mao Zedong employed these strategies. History shows that Andrew Jackson does not deserve to be compared with them, however, he committed similar acts like theirs , that were on a much smaller scale. The facts of the matter are, he forced a financial crisis onto the US because he was angry at the second national bank, he instituted a system that cost almost 1,000 people their jobs, and he ordered the genocide of over 4,000 Native Americans. The facts show that Andrew Jackson is infamous.
Andrew Jackson created a spoils system which gave jobs to his followers and created the first ever democratic system. “Jackson’s supporters worked to make the political system more democratic…” (Appleby, 2000) Jackson wanted to make a democracy because he thought that the old Caucus System was unfair. As a result of this Andrew Jackson created a democratic system in which many people can be involved in the election process. This process greatly changed the way the government worked because it made it so that the President is the choice of the people and not a political party. Also, “...Jackson fired many federal workers and replaced them with his supporters.” (Appleby, 2000) The practice of replacing government employees with your supporters became known as the spoils system. These two systems shook the government's system. Because of Andrew Jackson we have the presidents that we know today. This shows that Andrew Jackson should be on the 20 dollar
Enemy of Foe? Brave or coward? Good or Evil? Hero or Villain? Which category does our beloved seventh president Andrew Jackson fall into? Did he do more good or bad for our country? Did he make efforts to advance America or to just push us backwards? Many will argue either side fully. However, with such major contributions such as, the victory of the Battle of New Orleans, the Indian Removal act, and bailing our country out of a national debt. These few things along with many other march (I feel) Andrew Jackson as a bracer, do-right HERO of his time.
The way Jackson dealt with the Bank War painted him as a villain. When Jackson was first elected, he removed many high ranking government officials from office. The Miller Center reports, “Jackson claimed to be purging the corruption, laxity, and arrogance that came with long tenure, and restoring the opportunity for government service to the citizenry at large through "rotation in office.
The validity of President Andrew Jackson’s response to the Bank War issue has been contradicted by many, but his reasoning was supported by fact and inevitably beneficial to the country. Jackson’s primary involvement with the Second Bank of the United States arose during the suggested governmental re-chartering of the institution. It was during this period that the necessity and value of the Bank’s services were questioned.