Summary Of Hans Fallada's Every Man Dies Alone

1288 Words3 Pages

dissidents’ significance as “the righteous few” who redeem the nation is reinforced by the association between their rebellion and their children, who symbolize the nation’s future.” (938, Wilkes) It seems Fallada thought the good seeds were truly children, as they were innocent and not influenced by society just yet, and are the future, making them the conscious of the nation, or “good seeds”.
Inspector Escherish becomes involved as the cards get turned in to the police one by one. Enno Kluge (whose ex wife Eva Kluge lived in the same building as the Quangel’s) was a drunk who stole and did not care for his wife or kids, resulting in homelessness and self-pity. He was seen as a suspect as he was bothering the receptionist at a doctor’s office, to which the receptionist thought he was rather strange and of annoyance. Otto had happened to drop off one of his cards at the doctors that day, and Kluge was blamed for suspicion. The inspector knew Kluge was innocent, yet he had messed up, knowing …show more content…

The characters such as Otto and Anna Quangel battle in a silent, yet powerful way to demonstrate their dignity, as well as individuals of a better Germany. The author Hans Fallada added symbolism and depth to demonstrate the maltreatment that not only Jews, but also German citizen’s received as well. With Hans Fallada being one of them, it seems evident that he added a vast proportion of his personal experiences into the novel, through the characters actions, voices, and experiences. In the society Fallada had once lived, it was impossible to say how one truly felt, so it seems possible to be able to express opinion through fictional writing. Fallada claimed, "A novel has its own laws and can not follow in all of reality" (Groschupt, 2011) which is substantial proof that this author expresses his internal thoughts and personal life in this novel, amongst many other

Open Document