Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thoreau qualifying essay
Comments And Questions About Civil Disobedience By Henry David Thoreau
Conformity vs rebellion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thoreau qualifying essay
Throughout a series of books, and now movies known as Divergent they hit a lot of points as to what is believed as a “good society”. In the series, Divergent all must conform and fall into a certain category Dauntless, Abnegation, Erudite, Candor, or Amity . If one fails to do so, and falls into all of the categories they are known as “Divergent," and must be killed for failing to conform to traditional society standards and rules. This relates to Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau, because he talks about humans not needing a form of structure set by a hierarchy, such as a government. A good society according to Thoreau, is one with little to no government involvement, one that respects laws to a certain extent, and one that follows …show more content…
It is also a big part of Divergent, because being Divergent is essentially being your own person, you are not able to conform to what the government wants. This to Thoreau would be a great thing, this can be seen when he says, “It has not the vitality and force of a single living man; for a single man can bend it to his will” (Thoreau 255). So Thoreau believes that a single living man has more vitality and force than the traditional government. This is also true in Divergent, because Beatrice fights her government in every movie, she fights and is independent despite the masses who have become accustom to the tradition of relying on the government. Thoreau also goes on to talk about not saying there shouldn 't be a government at all, but one that should be there and eventually fade off. This can be seen when he says, “I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government” (Thoreau 255). This quote is significant, because Beatrice also wished this was possible. Throughout the movie she tries to explain why being Divergent is okay, but is essentially “shot down” in regard to her claim. It is also significant for Thoreau because he is independent, but not forceful in asking the government to stop all at once. Thoreau and Beatrice would agree that they do not need a government, and can be self-reliant and would come to an agreement on individualism, but they also would not expect the government to go away entirely anytime soon. Thus they both proposed that the government change in some way or
Though Henry David Thoreau lived more than one hundred years before the time of Martin Luther King Jr., his philosophy lingered in the minds of many individuals. Thoreau was opposed to injustice in general and refused to support or to follow the unjust laws. His idealism and anarchism influenced the thinking of King. Douglass' narrative shows how his thinking would have been similar to that of Thoreau's.
Thoreau wasn 't one to take advantage of what the world had to offer and just took life what it was, all while following his motto of doing what was right. Thoreau sees the miracles of the world similarly to the Whitman poem because there isn 't a limit to what can be appreciated. There are quite a few modern views that compare well to Thoreau as they take that step away from society defined by technology and progression and just take a look at the bigger picture, one of these approaches is the recent Occupy Wall Street movement.
In the passage "Civil Disobedience" by Thoreau the author explicitly states that the current government is not sufficiently strong enough for the governed a whole. Thoreau's diction directly states his belief on improving the government into a success. He firmly displays his argument through repetition and metaphors. First, Thoreau profoundly informs the negative downsides of the American Government. For instance he utilizes an example of repetition repeatedly stating, "It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the west. It does not educate. The repeated phrase "it does not" creates a sense of ultimate disapproval. A disapproval in which the author intends the audience to consider as well. Which in fact he disapproves the modifications
When it comes to the topic of how Henry David Thoreau chooses the audience for his texts, many agree that the reasoning involved the writer’s longing for achieving results rather than convincing an audience. When this agreement usually ends, however, is the question of why Thoreau ignores people who support the Mexican American War and slavery and instead focuses on those who protest against those issues. His writing philosophy in the essays “Civil Disobedience” and “Economy” shows his favouritism towards the idea that individuals need freedom of exercising their conscience and that this leads to success. His aims in targeting the unhappy and out speak their discontent shows potential that challenges slavery and the war. Consequently, this paper will address how Thoreau’s philosophy targets the discontented minority that voice their complaints and exercise their conscience.
"Civil Disobedience" by Thoreau describes the government and what he believes is best. Thoreau implements diction and imagery to support his claim that the best government is one that does not govern at all.
Emerson's third maxim "Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind" expresses the
In Henry Thoreau’s essay, Resistance to Civil Government, the harmless actions he takes to rebel against the government are considered acts of civil disobedience. He talks about how the government acts wrongful such as, slavery and the Mexican-American war. This writing persuades Nathaniel Heatwole, a twenty-year-old college student studying at Guildford College in Greensboro, North Carolina, to take matters into his own hands, by smuggling illegal items on multiple Southwest airplanes. The reason in that being, is to show the people that our nation is unsafe and dangerous. In doing this, he takes his rebellion one step too far, by not only jeopardizing his life, but as well as many other innocent lives.
Thoreau begins “On The Duty of Civil Disobedience” with the paradoxical quote, “That government is best which governs least…” Thoreau’s ideal is that government should exist for the bettering over a body of people, and as Thoreau writes, “The standing army is only an arm of the standing government…” he initiates that the army does not solve the problems of the people, but it is only there for the government’s own unethical interest and benefit. Thoreau considers that the objections to a standing government deserve to prevail because the standing army and standing government both have fluctuant options.
Philosophers are those who shape the minds of society, which is why there is no doubt that two of the greatest thinkers are still relevant in today's world. Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau came up with a philosophy known as Transcendentalism. This states that if people accept their flaws and differences and aren't afraid to stand out from society, then they resemble greatness. As demonstrated in their writings, Walden and Civil Disobedience, by Henry David Thoreau, and Self-Reliance, by Ralph Waldo Emerson, both of these writers emphasize the importance of individualism, intuition, and nonconformity. The ideas that these two men addressed are still constantly being adapted in real life situations all over the world today, even though
Thomas Jefferson said, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." Fresh from a revolution, Jefferson warned against complacency with one's government. No matter the safeguards or good intentions set in place by founders, the role of a citizen is to hold accountable his leaders.
The novel Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck and “On The Duty of Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau have the same fundamentals. In chapter seventeen of Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck writes about the migrant families integrate into one family, despite facing opposition from the government, land owners, and more. In “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”, Thoreau discusses the function of the government and how it is not applicable towards today’s society. Steinbeck writes about the passivity of the government on the times before and after the Great Depression and how this event affected many families. Steinbeck does not suggest that the government should intervene in the people’s problems, rather the people should rise up against their oppressors, who are the land owners. Thoreau writes about how the government is ineffective and unjust in its acceptance of slavery and its actions in the Mexican-American War. Both Thoreau and
The Act of Civil Disobedience in the eyes of the beholder is righteous and should be tolerated by many different governments all over the world, unfortunately when you act against the government there will be consequences for your actions even though you are composed and not dangerous to anyone. People may also say this disobedience is negative because humans can go into a primitive mode that makes them lose control and the same can go with the rest of the group. Cases of civil disobedience have grown to new height and will not stop until the people have their say in the matter at hand. Leaders in the past like Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr have had a positive impact in this world and allowed many men and women to stand up for what's right in today's society.
Learning about it and talking about it are two different things to me. Even though Divergent is set in a futuristic world a lot of the structures in that society go hand and hand with our society today. We have achieved or ascribed statuses, kids who are born into religion or parents who decide they want to be a certain religion. We have kids born into a certain job and do it because their parents want them to choose it. I see day in and day out people following the rules because they don’t want to be an outcast in society. If you don’t follow our society’s norms people look at you like you are crazy and no one wants to be looked at like they are crazy. If you don’t follow society’s rules then you can end up in poverty and have no one to care about you. So many people in the movie followed the rules because they thought that’s the only way society can be ran but it isn’t. Today I also see a lot of the same things going on. In the movie Tris stepped up and did the right thing, once Tris did that more and more stepped up and joined the cause. We today do the same thing, we don’t step up and do the right thing until others do. In present society we have primary groups who each have their purpose of keeping society functioning. We have teachers who teach knowledge to kids who someday will have jobs to keep society running. We have the work labor force to do the things that people like politicians don’t want to
He was an unorthodox writer who urged the capability of free thought and the importance of nature in constructing not only self-reliance, but also self-actualization and moral sense. Since he valued open-minded thinking, importance of nature, and self-reliance, Thoreau lived as a free spirit who did not need materialism.
In the passage " Civil Obedience" by Thoreau, Thoreau is utilizing tone and diction to explain his argument of allowing all men to decide their own kind of government.