Growing Up Trans: Growing Up Trans

1057 Words3 Pages

Puberty is a difficult time for any child, but for transgender teens, it can be the difference between becoming who they want to be or remaining in the wrong body. In June of this year, PBS Frontline released a documentary, entitled Growing Up Trans, which chronicled the lives of eight transgender and nonbinary children, from the ages of 9 to 19, as they navigated through the process of transitioning to their prefered genders. Some of the kids took hormone blockers to slow down their puberty, others were going through puberty at the time and wanted to transition before it was complete, and one had already gone through puberty and was still taking hormones to transition. The controversy revolving around the documentary focused on whether or …show more content…

She said that “I’m excited to just be a woman...now with the technology and the hormones, you can actually transform into who you actually envision yourself as” (Growing Up Trans). Ariel’s body would begin to develop womanly features like a curvy figure as she started to take the cross hormones. Cross hormones, as Paul Preciado writes about in his book Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era, were created by a physician named Harry Benjamin in the early 50s and 60s and “systematized the clinical use of hormonal molecules in the treatment of ‘sex change’”... (Preciado 27). This mix between technology and biology is what Preciado calls “pharmopornographic.” It is a combination of “the processes of biomolecular (pharmaco) and semiotic-technical (pornographic) government of sexual subjectivity” (Preciado 34). He states that pharmacopornography is not simply about creating a product and selling it to millions of people, it is about creating and selling a concept, which happens to be artificial hormones and biocodes. While Butler writes about the performance of gender, Preciado takes it one step further. Ariel would not only have to “pretend” to be a biological woman, she could physically become one. The technology that Ariel mentioned “has established its material authority by transforming the concepts of the …show more content…

Before taking hormones, Ariel felt as though she could not connect with the other girls about common feminine things: “I buy a bra but it’s not to hold in my boobs, it’s a sort of an illusion. It’s like an act” (Growing Up Trans). Butler too felt as though her identity was just an illusion. At a young age, Butler felt as though “what I ‘am’ is a copy of an imitation, a derivative example, a shadow of the real” (Butler 312). In a similar way, Ariel felt like she was simply an imposter of a girl and that by taking hormones and changing her biological make up, she could stop playing a role and become a new character completely. And the documentary leads the viewer to believe that this new character could only be unlocked through hormones, or by giving into what Preciado calls pharmopornography. While this may seem like the most logical conclusion, Preciado writes that “pharmacopornographic biocapitalism does not produce things. It produces mobile ideas, living organs, symbols, desires, chemical reactions, and conditions of the soul” (Preciado 36). Does that mean that hormones would only give Ariel the idea that she was a woman with womanly characterics? According to Butler, “the ‘being’ of the subject is no more self-identical than the ‘being’ of any gender; in fact, coherent gender, achieved through an apparent repetition of the same, produces as its effect the illusion of a prior and volitional subject”

Open Document