The Song Analysis Of Family Is Family By Kacey Musgraves

1337 Words3 Pages

I picked the song “Family is Family” by Kacey Musgraves because the way she talks about her family relates to me personally and Conley. The song hits me hard personally for many reasons. First, many items and events that happen have happened to me. Second, my family is far from perfect and in this song, she gives imperfections along with great qualities my family has. Third, my family is a huge support system. We are always there for each other in any way, shape or form. In a sociological manner, this song can be related to all family types whether divorced, married, or remarried. This song fits the chapter because it talks about relationships between family. Along with that it talks about marriage and divorce just like Conley does. Conley …show more content…

Conley states, “Eventually 86 percent of men and 89 percent of women are projected to get married, but men are more likely to remarry after a divorce” (Conley 460). I highly agree with this, I see this in my family and within other families as well. When these types of situations happen in families it is true that you always have your family and friends to fall back on just like Musgrave says in her song. A term Conley introduces in this chapter is, cohabitation which means “Living together in an intimate relationship without formal legal or religious sanctioning” (Conley 460). He also points out that when people get divorced most people will never get remarried but have a strong relationship with another person without getting married (Conley 460). I seem to find this very common among a lot of relationships, I feel the reason why is because people feel like they don’t need a title “marriage” to show how much they love each other. I can relate to the divorce and remarriage in my family through my uncle. He was married to my cousin’s mom for 12 years before they got a divorce. Well after they got a divorce he remarried and is now currently getting a divorce once …show more content…

Conley talks about early modern families and how families had kinship networks (Conley 463). Kinship networks is “Strings of relationships between people related by blood and co-residence (that is marriage)” (Conley 463). What he means is that when someone in the family needed help they could always fall back to a family member for their help. He gives a great example of a kinship relationship which is, “A down-and-out uncle might have a failed crop of wheat one summer. He could call in an IOU from his luckier cousin across the village, borrowing some of his crop and setting off a reciprocal exchange for food, clothing, and childcare” (Conley 463). This was very common and sometimes can still happen today. When Musgraves talks about money she is relating to Conley’s example in a modern way. What I mean by that is that most of the time even if a family member asks for help and they hardly don’t have money themselves they will still pitch in to help them out. My family and myself are like this, we are giving people. There have been many times when I don’t have very much money but if someone needed me to pay for their meal I would still do it. Along with that there has been many other times when my uncle needed a place to stay so he would stay at one of our family members houses and offer to cut the grass or buy groceries and what

Open Document