Essay PreviewMore ↓
Today the United States is a "sue happy" country. Over the last fifty years the crime rate has gone up. According to NationMaster.com, United Stated rank first in total crime with 23,677,800 which is much more than the second place Germany with 6,264,720. Total crime in this only includes rapes, murders, assaults, car theft. This information comes from the Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends which covers 1988 to 2000.
We have been introduced to a lot of new crimes that has arisen from the constant advancement in technology and more. There are a lot of white collar crimes. "The Supreme Court's caseload has grown substantially over time. John Marshall's first term as chief justice, the Court delivered only 15 opinions; in 1853 that number rose to 46, a pitiful handful by today's standards. By 1853, the number of cases docketed had risen to 253, still small compared to the current docket of more than 7,500. So too workload of lower federal courts have grown. In the 1820s, about 3500 cases were pending in the nation's circuit and district courts. In 1997 alone, litigants filed more than 270,000 cases in the U.S. district court and more than 50,000 in court of appeals."(Murphy 88)
With all these cases filed and all these cases that are appealed, there are not enough judges or courts for that matter, to handles all these cases. This is why the we have come up with Alternative Dispute Resolutions(ADR). ADR first came about 1960s. Alternative Dispute Resolution simply refers to any way to solve a legal problem without having to go to court. Alternative Dispute Resolutions(ADR) doesn't just deal with minor cases.. Even the Federal government have come up with Alternative Dispute Resolutions(ADR) Working Group which is a branch of the Office of Disputes Resolution at the U.S. Justice Department. Congress and the President established the Working Group to coordinate, promote, and facilitate the effective use of ADR in the government, pursuant to the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996. (Cinciotta)
The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act (ADRA) of 1996 requires federal agencies to have policies that address the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) techniques and to appoint a Dispute Resolution Specialist. For the purpose of the statute, "alternative means of dispute resolution" include conciliation, mediation, facilitation, fact-finding, minitrials and the use of "ombuds." (Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996.)
There are many different kinds of Alternative Dispute Resolutions.
How to Cite this Page
"Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)." 123HelpMe.com. 20 Jan 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Today the United States is a "sue happy" country. Over the last fifty years the crime rate has gone up. According to NationMaster.com, United Stated rank first in total crime with 23,677,800 which is much more than the second place Germany with 6,264,720. Total crime in this only includes rapes, murders, assaults, car theft. This information comes from the Seventh United Nations Survey of Crime Trends which covers 1988 to 2000. We have been introduced to a lot of new crimes that has arisen from the constant advancement in technology and more.... [tags: Court Case ADR Lawsuit]
1712 words (4.9 pages)
- The purpose of this paper is to discuss what Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is and how it came about, what different types of ADR there is to choose from and how ADR benefits both parties compared to litigation. ADR can quickly resolve almost any minor issue regarding most civil cases family, neighbors, employers, contractors, etc. ADR includes mediation (also known as conciliation), arbitration and settlement conferences. Some of the benefits of ADR include cost, speed, confidentiality, control, cooperative resolution and industry experts.... [tags: ADR]
2236 words (6.4 pages)
- In Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), the informal dispute resolution process, each involved party mutually agrees to meet with a professional third party to constructively and efficiently resolve their dispute rather than go to court. Through ADR, the parties are encouraged to engage in negotiations that promptly lead to the resolution of their dispute. The most common forms of ADR are mediation and arbitration. Although ADR is usually conducted on a voluntary basis, sometimes the courts require it before the case is taken to court.... [tags: ADR Conflict Resolution]
763 words (2.2 pages)
- This essay will provide a detailed examination of what Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is, particularly mediation, the various techniques of ADR, the advantages and disadvantages of ADR; and whether or not courts should have the authority to compel individuals into undertaking mediation or other forms of ADR. This essay argues against courts having the power to compel litigants into mediation but may be afforded powers to encourage parties to go through mediation at first instance. This essay will base its arguments on whether courts should compel civil litigants to follow the ADR route upon the perceived advantages of ADR and its success rate.... [tags: Alternative Dispute Resolution Essays]
2720 words (7.8 pages)
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involves dispute resolution processes and techniques that fall outside of the government judicial process. There has been moves against ADR in the past by entities of many political parties and their associates, despite this, ADR has gained inclusive acceptance among both the broad community and the legal profession in past years. In fact, many courts now entail some parties to remedy to ADR of some type, usually mediation, before allowing the parties' cases to be tried.... [tags: Government Law Legal Judge ADR]
1901 words (5.4 pages)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution Consider carefully the facts of the case study and advise Eagle Aviation Ltd. and Aircraft Ltd. of the alternatives to litigation in the ordinary courts and the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative form of ADR. This submission will identify and define each form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) including each of the forms advantages and disadvantages. It will also compare and contrast each form of ADR and consider which form or forms would be beneficial to both Eagle Aviation Ltd and Aircraft Ltd Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR can be defined as “any method of resolving a legal problem without resorting to the legal process” (Darbyshi... [tags: ADR Business Management Negotiation Essays]
1442 words (4.1 pages)
- Alternate Dispute Resolution Alternate Dispute Resolution has many benefits serving as a legal substitute for resolving civil disputes. Most courts prefer the proceedings of an ADR as appose to Litigation. In some counties the option of ADR must be analyzed before attempting to initiate the proceedings of litigation. Most district courts along with appeal courts will oversee the negotiations of an ADR. In some circumstances ADRs do not settle well and in those instances the involvement of the courts will resolve the remaining disputes.... [tags: Alternate Dispute Resolution]
1409 words (4 pages)
- The Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution Alternative methods of dispute resolution (ADR) are methods of resolving a dispute without resorting to using the courts. The fundamental principles of Alternative Dispute Resolutions are Negotiation, Tribunals, Conciliation, Arbitration and Mediation. Many of these approaches include the use of a neutral individual such as a mediator who can assist disputing parties in resolving their disagreements. The use of these methods helps in bringing justice to all people concerned with civil matters.... [tags: Papers]
991 words (2.8 pages)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an alternative way for people to settle disputes instead of going through the courts. There are many different types of ADR, which can be used to settle disputes. The most common methods of ADR are Tribunals, Negotiation, conciliation, mediation and arbitration. Negotiation is the method that most parties in dispute take before they take any further action. This normally conducted either directly between the parties who have a dispute or through their lawyers.... [tags: Papers]
721 words (2.1 pages)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the... [tags: essays research papers]
1011 words (2.9 pages)
Arbitration as defined by Nolo law dictionary as a non-court procedure for resolving disputes using one or more neutral third parties called the arbitrator or arbitration panel. Arbitration is a mini trial in which both parties decide on arbitrator. The arbitrator acts as the judge in a sense. He looks at the evidence and decides how to rule on the case. The decision that the arbitrator makes is binding. Because this is not a regular trial court, the rules of evidence and the procedures are not formal, so the case goes much faster, which is an advantage over a regular trial. A disadvantage is that sometimes the arbitrator is not neutral. I know from personal experiences that sometimes the arbitrator can be pay off by one of the cases dealing with property and sports.
The other most used type of ADR is Mediation. Mediation is a dispute resolution method designed to help battling parties resolve their own dispute without going to court. It is like an arbitration in that there is also third, neutral party, the mediator that helps them come to a solution. Mediation is different from arbitration in that the third party has no power. The mediator cannot enforce a solution as an arbitrator can. Like arbitration, an advantage of mediation is that it is fast. A disadvantage of mediation is that it doesn't always lead to a settlement. Mediation is mostly used in contract and civil damages cases. (Everybody's Legal Glossary)
Mini-trial is used often. Several courts try to get the parties to settle without the need for a regular trial by having a mini-trial in which the parties present their evidence and the court decides the outcome. When an outcome come cannot
be reached, the case is either sent to arbitration, or is just has to go to regular court. If an outcome is reached in the mini-trial, either party is can still decide to take the case to go to a regular trial regardless of what that outcome is. Like most ADR, mini-trial saves the court and the parties a lot of time, it also saves both parties a lot of money.
Summary jury trail is a shorten version of a regular jury trial. It is usually used for cases that will take a long time for a decision to be rendered. In a summary jury trial, there is a judge, only 6 jurors and there are not witness statements or experts to testify, the party only presents a summary of the case. After hearing both sides, the jury gives a verdict. The decision is not binding. The summary jury trial give the parties a forecast of how the case would go if taken to a regular trial. The point of it is to try to weed out some cases and let the party know if they should try to settle out of court or take the cast to the next level. It saves times.(Summary Jury Trial, 2002)
Neutral Evaluation is a form of ADR that is gaining popularity. It is kind of similar to mediation and arbitration in that a neutral person called an evaluator listens to both sides of the story and then tells both parties the strong and weak points of the case. The evaluator also tells the parties the value of the case and the likely result if it was to go to trial. Although this is not a solution to the problem, it helps save time by weeding out the frivolous cases and it also save both parties a lot of money which is a major advantage.
The next is early settlement conference. This is used in limited jurisdiction cases which have to do with damages that involves money $25,000 or less. The early settlement conference is usually requested by a party and both sides have to agree to it. In an early settlement conference, the judges work with both parties to try to come to settlement. An advantage to this is that it saves a lot of time. The disadvantage is that it is not used a lot because the other party doesn't usually agree to have the early settlement conference, or a lot of times the parties don't come to an agreement they do have it.
Mandatory Settlement Conference is used in every case that is expected to take more that a day. It takes place a week before the trial. It is to get the two parties to settle. When is does work that is a big advantage because as all other ARD, it saves time, however, most times it doesn't work, so the case end up going to trial anyways.
Conciliation is when both parties agree to have some one meet with the separately to some up with a solution or agreement. It is very much like arbitration and mediation but differs in some ways. It differs from arbitration in that the conciliator has no say in the decision. They just give their opinion. It differs from mediation in that the parties don't meet to discuss, all negotiations is done separately, it is also much more informal.
This lead us to the next one, negotiation. Negotiation is when the two dispute to try to come up with a solution. Sometimes there is a third neutral party that meets with them, but that third has no say in what is being discussed, they are just the solicitor. The agreement they some up with is binding.
Expert evaluation is when an expert in what ever area the case is about, evaluates the case. The expert evaluator is also a mediator. He will tell both parties the possible outcome, and how to achieve that outcome. (Alternative dispute resolution)
Plea bargain is one of the most important part of the United States justice system. Plea bargaining is used is criminal cases. As I mention the crime rate is constantly going up, and there are not enough, courts, judges and lawyers to trial all the cases, or not enough room in prison or enough prison to keep all the criminals, this is why we have plea bargain. It is a negotiation between the defendant and the prosecution. What happens is the defendant plea guilty without having to go through all the trial and in exchange he/she will get a lesser charge. This is an advantage to both the defendant and prosecutor, because the defendant of course gets a lesser sentence, it is helpful to the prosecutor because it saves them time, energy, and a lot of money. The disadvantage of this is that most people think its not fair of some one to commit a crime and get of easier for admitting that they did it.
Alternative dispute resolution has proven to be an effective way to cut down on the number of cases tried. A study of 821 civil cases was conducted in which the Assistant United States Attorneys used ADR. They found that the use of ADR helped settle 63% of the cases, it was also helpful in 17% because although it didn't lead to a settlement is helped in gaining insight to the plaintiff's case, narrow down the issue and prevent further disputes. They also found that when the ADR was voluntary 71% of those cases were settle.(Senger)
I think ADR should be used only at the state level. Although the number of cases that get to the federal level today are substantially more, they are still not too much for those courts to handle in my opinion. The cases that do get to the federal level are very important, therefore they should be handle in court.