The main character is developed over the text. In the book the main character is a dog named Buddy, who is reborn as Molly, who is reborn as Max, who is reborn as Toby, who is the ending incarnation of the dog. When the book starts Buddy is an older dog who is a big labrador sort of dog. “The fur on my legs was as black as the rest of me, but down at my paws it had, over time, become tinged with white.”(pg 1) Shows that he was an older dog, because when dogs grow older their hair turns gray, like a humans. He is a brave, kind dog. “I could see he was going to step on the baby. I was afraid of the horse….. My instincts were telling me to back up, to get out of there, but Clarity was in danger and I had to do something, something now. I swallowed my fear and barked at that horse with all the fury I possessed. I tightened my lips, showing my teeth, and lunged forward, putting myself between Clarity and Troy….. I backed up, still barking, pushing Clarity into the corner with my hips.”(pg 22 & 23) This shows that Buddy knew that the horse could hurt him, but he wasn’t going to back away because that would leave the baby in harms way, he was brave enough to protect her even though he was afraid. The next form of “him” is Molly (a female), a poodle mix. She is a little confuse at first as to why she is reborn, but soon realizes she has to take care of CJ (clarity in her teens, no longer a baby). She is very compassionate about CJ, and knows that she is extremely important to her. “Later the back gate clanged and Rocky and I tore over to see who it might be, and there she was. We both jumped up on her and I finally growled at Rocky for acting as if he was as important to her as I was.” This shows that Molly knows she is i...
... middle of paper ...
...ows he doesn’t like her and she knows not to trust him.
The point of view is from a dog inn first person, so its different than what a human would think in some situations, The dog also can easily misinterpret what she/he is supposed to do in situations because he/she can not understand what humans are telling him/her what to do. You can see that it is first person because you are reading the thoughts. It also uses like phrases like “I was confused” or “I hoped”.
The author does the events in sequence of when they happen, just as if you were experiencing them yourself. Not with too much insight as to what will happen in the kind of distant future but, there are little clues like you can just sometimes tell what will happen, but still a little surprising. The order in which the book is set up makes it feel more life like, and that it was actually happening.
Feelings are the most significant part of human’s creature, but what if it comes to the goal that one’s life is based on? Would it still be that important? In the article, “Dog Lab”, Claire McCarthy discusses her own experiences as a medical student at Harvard school. McCarthy was born in 1963. She did her residency at Boston’s Children’s Hospital and she is now working as a pediatrician at the Martha Eliot Health Center in the Jamaica Plains. During college, she used to keep a journal with her that provided the outline of her writings which she referred to for her books such as Learning How the Heart Beats: The making of a Pediatrician and Everyone's Children : A Pediatrician's Story of an Inner City Practice. In addition to McCarthy being
My prior knowledge consisted of knowing the big events and what happened, but I did not necessarily know the order of every event that happened. I liked how The Scratch of a Pen read in order. It explained what happened and it showed pictures to help explain. For me it gave me a greater understanding of what happened, but at the same time it was a difficult book to read. Once I really sat down and focused on it and the content the book read like a time line and everything flowed together to tell a story and that is what helped made everything clearer.
issues that the author deal with in the book are a prediction of the future; it can
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time is told through the eyes of a fifteen year old boy named Christopher Boone. Christopher has a highly-functioning form of autism which allows him to understand complex mathematical problems, but also leaves him unable to comprehend many simple human emotions. His inability to understand metaphors, distinguish emotions, and his lack of imagination makes it possible to consider Christopher as functioning like a computer rather than functioning as a human being. Throughout the story, Christopher is faced with many challenges which he conquers using the stable and never changing system of mathematics. All of these factors suggest that Christopher does, in fact, function like a computer, but it is apparent early in the story that Christopher, regardless of anything else, is capable of independent thought which separates him from the programmed, dependent world of computers.
This is used to indicate how far characters have progressed on their journey as well as to show emotions that are otherwise deliberately obfuscated by the author. London’s story provides more through body language for both the hiker and the husky that accompanies him. The body language of the hiker in the story reflects the resilience, perseverance, and hard-headedness that encompasses his foolishness and pride. The dog in London’s story is a husky, which London believed symbolized both civilization and wilderness. This husky values what his instincts over his pride and serves as a counterbalance to the hiker to show how out disillusioned of nature the hiker is. This yin and yang of body language between the husky and the hiker throughout the story displays how London wanted to give the reader something to compare the absurdity of the hiker’s desire to hike nine miles through negative 150 degree weather just to get to his buddies in the lodge with the self-preservation and rational instinct of the husky as well as to not desensitize us to the hiker’s irrational decisions. While in Conner’s story, body language and tone support each other in hiding the true nature of characters in her story and the eyes and actual actions of the characters are meant to actually reveal what the body language and tone conceal. One prime example is how the
Take a moment and picture a dog in your head. What do you see? You may see many different things depending on your own personal encounters with the species. There are many types of dogs out there. Some small, some large, long-haired or short-haired. There are many variances in what a dog can look like. One thing that does not change, or should not change, is the importance for every dog in this world to be given love and affection, no matter its characteristics. This is what leads me to believe that the obsession with producing and owning purebreds needs to come to a halt. Continuing to create these so-called “best dogs” is dangerous to not only the purebred’s health, but also devalues mixed breeds and can cost them their lives in animal shelters where they may never escape. My interest in this topic caused me to look into seeing what other people felt about it.
The poem opens in medias res of the teenager’s testimony as he recalls the mistreatment of a dog. Smith illustrates the offender “[dragging the dog] across the floor, / its claws out in resistance” (Smith 3-4) in order to victimize the hound. With its flaws flailing in protest, the animal is clearly unhappy with the offender’s actions. Even the appearance of the dog with “fur hooding its eyes” frames it as a vulnerable creature whose mop of hair obscures its vision—a fragile barrier from witnessing the horrors of the world (Smith 5). The description becomes violent as the the offender “shook and twisted / the folds of [the dog’s] neck” (Smith 7-8) implying strangulation. Arguably the most vivid description of abuse in the poem, Smith leaves
The speaker scans his surroundings, “muck, pond, ditch, residue”(5), spondee, stressed words, are used to show the typical image of a distracted dog. This is further emphasized in the enjambments and caesuras at the hyphens and colons, to express the unpredictable actions of the speaker. At the beginning the speaker includes rhetorical questions, to highlight the merry, short attention span, “Fetch? Balls and sticks capture my attention seconds at a time. Catch? I don’t think so” (1-2). The rhyme scheme is abba ccdd efef gh and often are slant rhymes which shows the dog is not as educated as a human. The vowel ‘o’ in “or else you’re off in some fog concerning/ --tomorrow”(9-10) is an assonance and “bow-wow…”(14), is onomatopoeia illustrates the dog howling and barking at his human.
On June 20, Charlotte Alter posted an article on TIME website titled, “The Problem with Pit Bulls”. In her article she starts with an event that happened to a three year old little girl that was attacked by three Pit Bulls. The little girl and her family were in KFC and one of the employees asked her to leave because her face was “disrupting their customers”. Half of the little girl’s face is now paralyzed and she has also lost her vision in one of her eyes because of the three Pit Bulls that attacked her. Her grandfather killed the three Pit bulls that attacked her; however her grandfather is now facing charges of child-endangerment. KFC was so generous to donated money to the family to help with her medical bills. But yet the rant is more
“He pulled them up to me, concern in his eyes and making a soft whine, and I reached into his ruff and pulled his head down and hugged him and was never so happy to see anybody probably in my life. The I felt something and looked down to see one of the other dogs-named Duberry-licking the wound in my leg.” Here you can see the dogs looking at the character and feel what he is feeling. This passage does not just describe the surface description, but goes more in depth to the things unseen by the audience.
Their description of their love for their dog could also describe the dog's loyalty in a way because dogs are known for being very loyal to their owners as well as loving them very much. The owner may feel as though they will feel bad once the dog dies because of how loyal and loving the dog was. Also the dog may have saved him from a dangerous situation. The clue to that is when they say "how will I know in thicket ahead is treasure or danger."
I enjoyed the book because the scenarios are very well described so the reader can clearly imagine the events in their mind.
The curious incident of the dog in the night time was narrated in first person by Christopher Boone however If it was narrated in third person the audience would not have understood the way Christopher was feeling. Communication, Social Interactions, Relationship’s and Christopher’s Autism spectrum disorder were some of the main areas expressed in the novel.
"Honey," my mom yelled to me one sunny afternoon, "Go out and feed Sugar." Sugar was our dog, a big, husky lap dog. I went to our kitchen, and got some food. Then I stepped outside, into the warm, fresh August air, looking for Sugar. I glanced to where I kept Sugar, and couldn't believe my eyes. Sugar was not there. I ran to the place where Sugar slept, I saw that the leash was elegantly coiled up. I knew that Sugar could not have run away. I thought that she must have chased a deer or another animal. Then a disturbing thought hit me, Sugar might have been abducted. As I tried to push that thought out of my mind, I thought that my mom could have put Sugar out in the garage. I went to the garage to check, but unfortunately Sugar wasn?t there. ?Mom,? I cried after a couple of seconds, ?Do you know where Sugar is??
The dog quotes other characters whose presence is questioned by the woman. The referred-to characters are her lover, family members, and enemy. The poem is essentially a dialogue between the woman and her dog. She is astounded to sense that someone is “digging” on her grave, and is disappointed every time she provides an anxious guess. The woman’s first guess is her lover, and asks if he is planting a rut on her grave.