Essay PreviewMore ↓
I was wondering today what could be more important for the church than what I'm about to talk about? If I could have my way, if I could dream up a certain consequence for the church, if I could have one thing be true, what would that thing be? I would want for the church in this day and age to simply have a clear understanding of what Christianity is about.
A conversation that I had with a gentleman yesterday evening at the retreat was about a frustration that he was confronting with a young lady and a young man who was her boyfriend. The young lady was a Christian, the young man was not a Christian. You can imagine what the first frustration is, right? What's this committed Christian doing with a non-Christian in a relationship? That's forbidden by the Bible, and for very good reason. 2 Corinthians 5 or 6, "Do not be unequally yoked with non-believers.
How to Cite this Page
"A Christian View Of Suffering." 123HelpMe.com. 19 May 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- A consistent theme of mine is how critically important it is for us to have a foundational understanding about what Christianity is about. Most of us who have been in the church for a while know a few things: God loves us. Jesus forgives our sins. Unless you believe in Jesus you're going to Hell. We can have a relationship with God. We have these scattered bits of theological facts, but what we don't often have is an understanding of how it all fits together. I was wondering today what could be more important for the church than what I'm about to talk about.... [tags: Christian Religion Religious]
1961 words (5.6 pages)
- (1) Points of agreement The Bible corroborates Buddhist point of view regarding the pervasiveness of suffering: “Man is born to trouble as surely as sparks fly upward” (Job 5:7). There is no way to escape suffering in this life. From birth to death, the entire human experience is characterized by suffering. The same way Buddhism considers desires as negative, Christianity also exhorts against desires that can cause us to disobey God and ultimately cause our loss. Jesus’s words in this verse is pertinent “and the cares of this world, the deceitfulness of riches, and the desires for other things entering in and choke the word, and it becomes unfruitful” (Mark 4:19).... [tags: Christianity, Jesus, Christian terms, Buddhism]
1687 words (4.8 pages)
- ... He referenced two sections in the bible that clearly express God’s allowance of evil coming to existence. In the book of Genesis, chapter 3, the serpent tries to lure Eve to eat the apple when God specifically instructed her to not to do so. During her resistance he says to the serpent “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, 3 but God did say, ‘you must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’” “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman.... [tags: good, god, powerful, belief, suffering]
2010 words (5.7 pages)
- Having never considered much about world views until after visiting a Christian world view camp, I wanted to know more about mine. As a Christian, naturally I would have a Christian world view, but I did not really know what that meant. I did not think much about the nature of God, or man, or even the cause of evil and suffering. Although I did not doubt my Christianity, I only doubted my knowledge of it, and ability to defend the Christian faith. I knew the root of all suffering came from sin, and that since Adam and Eve sinned, all man is burdened with sin.... [tags: christian, viewpoint, god]
851 words (2.4 pages)
- Spiritual growth and maturity are essential to developing as a Christian and reaching the highest potential in Christ. As a novice cannot be expected to perform a task as a master, the same holds true for an infant in Christ. Paul in verse two of chapter three of his Letter to the Church of Corinth, states that he had to treat them as infants in Christ feeding them milk instead of solid food because they desired to please their flesh instead of the spirit. So understanding an individual’s spiritual maturity is important to ensure healthy growth.... [tags: Jesus, Christianity, Christian terms]
1403 words (4 pages)
- The Christian view of evil and the Greek view of evil are complete opposites as depicted in Dante Alighieri’s play The Divine Comedy: Inferno compared to Euripides play Medea. The Christian view differs from the Greek account of evil by the belief in God. The Christian view has clear boundaries of good and bad behavior as shown in Inferno while the Greek belief is that nothing is inherently evil as seen in Medea. The Christian and Greek views differ on the punishment directly related or unrelated to the evil behavior.... [tags: view of evil, Dante Alighieri, play analysis]
1276 words (3.6 pages)
- From prophet, to savior, to even person of historical significance, the identity of Jesus Christ can be seen from many different perspectives. While some faiths, such as Judaism and Islam, view Jesus as a great prophet, the Catholic Church narrows in on Jesus’ importance as a savior and divine being in the Trinity. This focus often overlooks Jesus’ essential identity as human. Through Jesus’ innate identity as human, the Christian message is made relatable and accessible to all people. Through Jesus’ suffering in both his public ministry and crucifixion, humans are able to more fully understand the message of Christianity.... [tags: Jesus, New Testament, Suffering, Christianity]
835 words (2.4 pages)
Is Socrates view of the soul becomes purify similar to the Christian view of living in the world not of it?
- The soul is a mysterious entity; unlike its counterpart the body, it cannot be concretely study as a physical object. Parts of philosophy and religion delve into the topic of the soul, trying to denude its nature. As philosophy and religion sometimes resemble each other’s views, assumptions of similarity are made between the two. However, despite appearing similar, upon deep review of the subjects, philosophy and religion may differ in views. This is seen in Socrates’ view of the soul versus the Christian idea of it.... [tags: Philosophy]
1112 words (3.2 pages)
- The Christian View of Revelation Revelation by definition is the disclosure of facts or theories through religious events that have previously remained hidden. For Christians revelation is mainly associated with the revelation of God to his people throughout the ages. God has made himself known to us but we have to consider that he has also presented himself to us, with the choice up to us whether we accept his love. God has not pressed Himself up us. His acts of love remain the motivation for our acceptance of God.... [tags: Papers]
1164 words (3.3 pages)
- Death from a Buddhist and Christian Point of View “You will be with me today in paradise,” Jesus Christ told this to the thief on the cross while they were dying. However, can people believe that there is truly life after death. In many different religions there are different perceptions of life after death. For example in the Buddhist religion, the Buddhist people believe that life is practice for death. Professor Brown, of California State University of Northridge stated, “The Buddhist people cultivate positive, happy virtuous states of mind and abandoning non-virtuous, harmful, suffering states of mind.” This teaching is mirrored by Christianity teachings as well.... [tags: essays research papers]
1091 words (3.1 pages)
There's a practical consideration, as well, because you're just gonna drive each other nuts if you take seriously your Christianity, and that person takes seriously their non-Christianity. They are just two different worldviews, two ways of thinking about reality. In fact, in this relationship, there was conflict. The young lady is trying to make sense of Christianity to the young man and she is not able to do it because the substance of her Christianity is a feeling about God. Let's face it, when we talk about relationships, generally we are cashing this out in personal, subjectivistic, emotional terms.
When we read books, or have seminars, or listen to tapes or teachings that talk about improving our relationship with God, it is never about knowing something about God that we don't already know. It's always about some trick that makes us feel differently. Get closer to God, have this deep, personal, warm experience with God.
By the way, I'm not against having an emotional closeness to God. I just think it's the tail and not the dog. And to a great degree, we have the tail wagging the dog. My concern is that sometimes you have the tail wagging so hard that the dog disappears altogether. The dog is the truth of Christianity, the substance of what it is about. The Christian is the tail, not the dog. The feelings are the tail, not the dog. And relationship is the tail, if you're cashing it out in experiential terms, not the dog.
This young lady has a relationship with God in primarily subjective terms. What's the problem? She can't communicate the ineffable attributes of her relationship. And who can? I mean gentlemen, you love your wives, women you love your husbands. How do you explain that to somebody? You could say "I love them" but it is very difficult to communicate the subjective elements of a relationship. Once you feel it, you know it, and sometimes that's how we relate our relationship with God. You want to become a Christian? You've got to have the faith, then you feel it, you know it. When you really connect with God, then you really know what it is.
That was the best she could do, and her frustration is that she couldn't explain this deep feeling that she has for God. And her non-Christian boyfriend wants to make sense of her point of view. She wants him to become a Christian. "What does that mean?" "Well, I want you to believe in Jesus. Then you can have your sins forgiven, and you can go to Heaven. But if you don't believe, you're in big trouble." And he says, "That's Greek to me. That makes no sense. I don't even know how to comprehend the meaning of those words."
When we take little pieces out of the entire system, how can we expect people to understand Christianity? It's like saying, "You want to understand how a car works? Here, look at this carburetor." Even if you understood some things about the carburetor, you have to know how the carburetor fits into the whole machine. When you understand the system, then they understand what we're saying. He's trying to get it, but he doesn't have the big picture to fit all the parts. The problem is that the young lady doesn't appear to have the parts, either. She has a part. She doesn't have the system. If she had the system, she could explain it.
We have two problems here. First of all, she is living in disobedience. I can understand if one is cashing out religious truth in experiential terms, it's very easy to move from one experience to another. She experiences a love relationship with God, and now she's experiencing a love relationship with this guy. They're kind of both love relationships and if the experience is what makes it valid. But if it is truth that is driving someone in their relationship with God and not experience, then it becomes pretty evident for somebody who has a marginal understanding of the text that there is a violation of truth in this relationship. There's a difference.
The core issue is a basic understanding of Christianity. The boyfriend has an honest question about Christianity. The gentleman I talked to last evening told me about spending three hours with the young man trying to lay it out for him because he didn't understand it.
Think about this just for a minute. When the non-believer asks "Why is Jesus the only way?" he's asking her to make her view coherent. He's asking her to tell the Christian story such that the idea that Jesus is the only way is a sensible idea. He's not even really asking her to prove that such a thing is actually true. That's a separate question. He's just trying to understand the view.
I am sympathetic to a non-believer who wants to know why Jesus is the only way; I am frustrated when a Christian wants to know why Jesus is the only way. The non-believer does not have the whole picture; the Christian is expected to understand the basic picture.
There's a book out that is exceptionally well done. It's written by Chuck Colson and Nancy Pearcy entitled How Now Shall We Live?, reminiscent of a title of a Schaffer book some 25 years ago. Of course, they revisit a lot of Schaffer's themes. If you are at all confused about what the big picture is, this is the book to get. Colson and Pearcy engage this question intelligently and they employ a very standard motif that consists of four areas: creation, fall, redemption and restoration. In a more popular sense, you can say: Where do we come from, what's wrong with us, how do you solve the problem, and then how do you put everything else right that has been hurt by the problem?
Do you realize that every worldview had to answer those questions? How you start will determine where you move from there. How you understand the nature of the problem will determine how you characterize the solution. If the problem is just ignorance, then the solution is education. If the problem is genetic error, then the solution is genetic manipulation. If the problem is sin, then the solution is forgiveness.
In the Christian worldview, God created a world, He's in charge, and He created human beings to have fellowship, companionship, and involvement with Him. Human beings are special in that regard; they are a higher order of creation. They have a capability that other creatures don't have: moral choice. They use this capacity that was meant for good for something evil and become rebels in God's kingdom. As rebels in God's kingdom, they become guilty of crimes against God and liable for punishment. That's our problem.
The Jewish is, "I just don't get it. Why do I have to believe in your Jesus? I've got my Judaism, I've got my belief in God. I try to lead a good life." To him that just made sense.
Do you understand that he has a picture of reality here? His picture of reality is that God exists and demands moral conduct. This gentleman is basically a good person so he's in on that view, but he doesn't understand why he's got to add some theological notion about Jesus to the equation. His view seems adequate. What the Christian has to do in answering his question is to go back to the foundation and show what's wrong with the foundation. In fact, I think people already know what's wrong with their foundation; they just haven't thought it through.
I offered him a couple of questions to help him see the difficulty with his foundation. I asked him two questions: Do you believe that people who commit moral crimes ought to be punished? He said, "Well, since I am a prosecuting attorney, yes, I guess so." "Great so do I." I agreed with him at that point.
Second question: Do you, have you, ever committed any moral crimes? Now it's a personal issue, right? What do you think he said? He said, "Yes, I guess I have." What do you think I said? "So have I. Now, here's where we've come so far. We both believe that people who commit moral crimes ought to be punished, and we both believe that we've committed moral crimes. You know what I call that? Bad news."
There's a little wake-up cal. Even by his own standards, he is not good enough. And this is where the cross comes in. We identify the problem, and we offer a solution that is adequate to the problem. Jesus is the only way because He is the one who has solved the problem. He is the one who died for sins. Buddha hasn't done that. Mohammed hasn't done that. Krishna hasn't done that. No other religious leader or world leader has done what Jesus has done. He is the medicine that cures the sickness. Even though there are other medicines out there, they are not adequate to the task.
This is the point that Christians have to be able to communicate to the rest of the world. We've got to be able to make coherent sense of our message, even before we demonstrate that our message is actually true.
This is what I wish upon the church, what I pray for the church: that we would have at least a foundational understanding of why Jesus is necessary. That ought to be a basic part of our Christian education. We should have at least an adequate understanding to be able to say clearly what Christianity is and what it's about before we even think about defending it to someone else.