Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern world history world war 2
America's role in the Suez crisis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 1956, the United States, led by President Dwight Eisenhower, became self-enveloped in the Suez Canal Crisis involving Israel, Egypt, France, and Great Britain. The United States involvement in the Suez Canal Crisis not only resulted in an Egyptian and Soviet victory, but it also revealed that the United States was capable of gambling in order to gain alliance with Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser as a gateway into the Middle East. America, left utterly dismayed by its allies who planned an endeavor that neglected the country, became involved in the Suez Crisis to confirm its position as the super power in the Middle East. Great Britain had been present in Egypt since the very beginning of the Suez Canal. The nation recognized the power of the man-made waterway that linked Europe to Asia. The entire world understood the importance of the canal, knowing that if it became nationalized and taken over by the Egyptian government, it could be closed to the use of other countries. On July the twenty-sixth of 1956, Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser did just that. Frightened by the nationalization of the Suez Canal by Egypt, the British decided to create a secret alliance with Israel and France that persuaded Israel into invading Egypt even though Egypt, gaining military aid from the Soviet Union, was planning to successfully invade Israel (Milner).
Before the canal was made, merchants and sailors sailed down to the southern tip of Africa known as the Cape of God Hope and up towards the Indian Sea. The Suez Canal was created by Ferdinand Lesseps and it opened in November of 1869 so that ships could travel from Europe to Western Asia. The canal was dug through the bones and remains of those Egyptian workers who toiled and dug the canal m...
... middle of paper ...
... was placing a pricy bid on one of the most prosperous regions in the world in its time of need. The U.S could have remained neutral about the topic, but seeing that the USSR was beginning to aid the Egyptians in 1955 (Milner), Eisenhower became involved so that no doubts would be made about which nation held its power in the Middle East.
Works Cited
"An Affair to Remember." The Economist. The Economist Newspaper, 29 July 2006. Web. 27
Mar. 2014.
Ignatius, David. "What the Suez Crisis Can Remind Us about U.S. Power." Washington Post.
The Washington Post, 25 Jan. 2013. Web. 26 Apr. 2014.
McDermott, Rose. "Chapter 6: The 1956 Suez Crisis." Risk-taking in International Politics:
Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan, 1998. 135-64. Print.
Milner, Laurie. "The Suez Crisis." BBC News. BBC, 3 Mar. 2011. Web. 25 Mar. 2014.
The Guardian. The Guardian. The. 10 Jan. 2014. Web. The Web.
U.S. policymakers then began to focus on Mideast oil in 1943 and began to make decisions about whether or not the venture would work in the long run economically. However there was also another superpower that had their eye on the Middle East and its rich foundation of oil. The British began also to desire concessions in the Middle East and to become a contender in the race towards power. This competition caused problems between the two countries and in 1944 the countries attempted to form an agreement however, this agreement failed because of the opposition in the United States senate.
Meyer, Bruce, Dr. "Suez Canal Crisis." CBCnews. CBC/Radio Canada, n.d. Web. 07 Dec. 2013. .
The Blockade's Effect on Relations Between the Superpowers in the Years to 1955 Even before the blockade, there was suspicion and tension. It was a bad time. The blockade then changed relations between the superpowers in many ways. The blockade was a result of difference in opinion regarding the future of Germany.
The First Persian Gulf War between 1990 and 1991 was the most militarily efficient campaign in US history where comparatively few lives were lost. This war accomplished many goals, including that it secured the economic advantages for the “Western World”.
...his actions. To Nasser, the superpowers were simply used and discarded when circumstances dictated such an approach. By the end of 1958, however, this approach appeared to backfire as Iraq became the Soviets favored ally and seemed to challenge Nasser’s hegemony in the Middle East. As such, Nasser’s subsequent repression of local communists brought him in conflict with the Soviet Union and caused a shift in the policies of the United States. The United States, in turn, approached Egypt in a similar vein as evidenced in its shifting policies as circumstances changed. It is therefore not surprising that by the end of 1958, the US adopted a policy of maintaining its alliances with its regional allies and also abandoning its confrontational policy with Nasser. Not surprisingly, the relationship would continue to fluctuate into the 1960’s until Nasser’s death in 1970.
The country I decided to research is Egypt. Egypt is located in northern Africa along the Mediterranean and Red Seas. The majority of the country however is located in northeastern Africa, but its Sinai Peninsula extends out into Southwest Asia, connecting the two continents. European nations wanted to colonize Egypt because it was considered to be a treasure, due to its fertile land and production of crops, such as: wheat, fruits, vegetables, corn, and cotton. Also because of its strategic location at the head of the Red Sea, that appeared valuable to countries such as Britain and France. Another reason was because they wanted to control Egypt in order to secure the main route to India, Malaya, Australia, New Zealand and to Hong Kong.This route was known as the Suez Canal. The Suez Canal was viewed as the “Lifeline of the Empire” because it allowed quicker access to its colonies in Asia and Africa. It also connected the Red Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, built mainly with French money from private interest groups using Egyptian labor. Egypt was also targeted due to its weak economy and government, making it an easy target to imperialize. Egypt was colonized three times each by different civilizations. It was colonized by the Ottomans in 1517, by the French in 1799, and by the British in 1882. A key person involved in Egypts colonization was Muhammad Ali. After taking power in 1805, he strengthened the army and focused on cultivating the land. He also increased trade with Europe and sent officials to Britain to be educated.
The Panama Canal was one of the largest projects in history. It spanned over a decade with over 5,000 employees working daily on it. President Theodore Roosevelt, in his autobiography, spoke about the impact of the canal on his career, “By far the most important action I took in foreign affairs during the time I was President was related to the Panama Canal.” Roosevelt believes that the Panama Canal was the biggest thing he had done during his presidency for America. Although many historians are not certain if the canal was financially beneficial, the canal undoubtedly led America to become the imperialist power it is today. Although in 1999 the United States lost control of the canal, it still remains a key reason for America’s success as a nation.
The Gulf War was much more than a fight to liberate Kuwait. It was the first non-conventional war; in which new, fairly new, or even experimental weapons were used. The Gulf War displayed much new technology that you will learn lots about in this paper. This paper may sound very technical, but that is what it is about, the new weapon technology vs. the conventional types of weapons used in previous wars. This paper is about the advancement of weapon technology, and how the military changed the tactics used before.
...nt Carter tried to establish peace among Israel and other Arab nations. He brought Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat together at the Camp David Retreat Center where an agreement was made between the men and U.S. Troops were to be stationed in the Sinai Peninsula to keep watch.
Watts, Tim. "Iran hostage crisis." World History: The Modern Era. ABC-CLIO, 2011. Web. 28 July 2011.
Watson, Stephanie. "Iranian Hostage Crisis." Encyclopedia of Espionage, Intelligence and Security. Ed. K. Lee Lerner and Brenda Wilmoth Lerner. Vol. 2. Detroit: Gale, 2004. 158-60. U.S. History in Context. Web. 18 Apr. 2014.
Nye, Jr., Joseph S. “Hard and Soft Power in American Foreign Policy.” In Paradox of American Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 4-17. Print.
...ed to nationalize the Suez Canal through which three fourths of all European oil is passed. After several months of negotiations Britain, France and Israel attacked Egypt and retook the canal. United Nations condemned their actions and forced them to give up the canal to Egypt once again. As a result of the Eisenhower convinced Congress to approve the Eisenhower Doctrine that would “assist any nation in the region that required aid against aggression from any nation controlled by International Communism.” The Eisenhower administration was very careful not to alienate any Middle Eastern countries that could provide the country with a steady supply of oil and this affected his foreign policy and the policy of containment.
Before 1953 foreigners, more specifically the British, and the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlevi, were the benefactors of the wealth generated by oil production. In 1953 Prime Minister Mosaddegh confronted the Anglo-Persian Oil Company and took control of oil production in Iran. His intent was to use the oil production profits to improve the lives of the Iranian people. The British response was a blockade of the Persian Gulf in conjunction with an economic boycott. This brought oil production to a standstill. Winston Churchill, The British Prime Minister, turned to the United States President, Dwight David Eisenhower, to intervene. Churchill suggested to Eisenhower that Iran was close to aligning with the Soviet Union. The U.S. policy of containment meant that the U.S. would step in to avoid the spread of Communism. (Prior Knowledge) Operation Ajax, a joint effort by the CIA and MI6, caused the Shah to dismiss Mosaddegh which caused many Iranians to hate America. (Document A) The Shah used the wealth generated by oil production to westernize Iran, giving women more rights, peasants an opportunity to own land, and better health care and education. (Document D) The S...