Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
No more backpacks in school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: No more backpacks in school
Everyday there is a chance that students can forget something that they need in their backpacks which are in their lockers, but if backpacks were allowed in class then students would not have to miss out on what was being taught to get what they need from their lockers, so we should be able to bring backpacks because it would be faster to access the things we need. Teachers should allow students to bring their backpacks in class because it would be easier them taking them to their lockers. In a student’s view is that they should be able to bring their backpacks in class because they might have to turn in some papers if it was late, or missed the other day and it helps keep some personal items more accessible if no one wants to see them. They should be able to carry their backpack in class it makes it easier for transitioning between classes because they will have everything there with them in their backpack and not in their locker. …show more content…
Another reason to allow backpacks is obviously there is not enough time between classes to get everything. In ¬¬¬Backpacks are Necessary for Being Prepared and Should Not be Banned in the classroom by Olivia Graham said, “Students would be minutes late to class, and the teacher may have to repeat what he has already begun
First, allowing students to carry backpacks throughout the school day would save everyone time. Since backpacks have multiple compartments, they allow students to carry learning materials like textbooks, calculators, binders, and writing utensils. Students can use backpacks to transport laptops inside dedicated sleeves. As a result, students would waste less time at their lockers searching through debris for assignments and missing homework. Teachers, too, will welcome backpacks when they no longer have to squander valuable minutes writing locker passes. Less locker stops will reduce hallway congestion, expediting travel between classes. Without wasting the teacher’s precious minutes, students can get a drink of water, go to the bathroom, or take care of personal hygiene needs. . Even custodians will appreciate the practicality of backpacks when they are no longer interrupted from their busy jobs to unjam a muddled locker because of cumbersome coats and binders.
The school locker is usually the only private space available to a student in the environment of the school. So it focuses many of the main issues involved in privacy of the students. The 4th Amendment of the US Constitution states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,papers,and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.”
The author provided three arguments to support the ban of backpacks in classrooms. The authosr's use of language is organized, however, the author did not effectively provide strong evidences to support his arguments, many of his arguments are have little logical connection with the topic. There are also many redundant points which decreases the effectiveness of the argument. Therefore the strength of his argument is not solid.
According to the National Education Association, at least 100,000 students bring guns to school, 160,000 students skip classes because they fear physical harm, 40 students are killed or hurt by firearms, nearly 6,250 teachers are threatened with bodily injury, and 260 teachers are physically assaulted. These facts are not based on once year, but as every single school day. Could one even imagine what the numbers might look like on scale for a month of school, let alone a whole year? So would starting with searching lockers really be a step to far to try and lower the numbers? Some may think yes due to the school invading the students’ privacy. The majority of people though will say no, doing searches of student’s lockers is not a bad thing. Though there may be a few draw backs to conducting locker searches, the benefit of them far outweigh them. Schools should have the right to do searches of the student lockers because it will deter unwanted things, they have permission under loco parentis, and it would allow administers to make sure for safer schools.
In this article, Kieffer describes the concept of the whole "Bring Your Own Technoogy" initiative that schools are leaning towards in our society today. Basically, as schools are adding more technology, they are considering allowing students to bring their own devices to save money. Later on in the article, Kieffer pulls examples from schools in the northeast Mississippi area that have already banned students from using cell phones on campus. This article suits my topic well because it provides a good proposal for why schools should allow personal devices on campus.
For instance, if a student had harmful things in their locker, it’d be easier to find and confiscate them. This would prevent a potential dangerous situation, and the student would face proper consequences. Whilst I agree that locker searches could definitely potentially keep schools safer, I still believe that there are better ways to enforce safety than going through a student’s possessions, which could be mentally damaging. Mental health is equally as important as physical health, so damaging one to fix the other is still creating
First, schools have grown more violent lately with school shootings at Columbine, Sandy Hook, Newtown Elementary, and Townville. Schools should be able to search students lockers to check for weapons or other evidence that they might be planning to carry out a similar attack. This would hopefully help reduce the number of school shootings that occur. For example “100,000 students bring guns to schools” (Taylor). Locker searches at more schools might help to reduce that number.
In this day and age where school administrators consider backpacks, lockers, and baggy pants to be potential dangers to students and faculty, what will be next? Perhaps pencils, pens, scissors, and glue will be added to the list of items to ban from schools. These, along with other hazardous educational necessities pose real threats to maintaining an orderly school and should be prohibited.
“Lockers searches are a necessary part of security within the school building to ensure guilt or lucid proclamation of the criminals by securing stolen belongings, drugs, or weapons within the lockers”(Hartman 1). The pros of locker searches are the student acknowledgement that the lockers will be searched if necessary ,so students are less likely to bring school-violating objects into the school building. Drug-sniffing dogs are administered to alert administrators if drugs or illegal substances are within the suspected student’s lockers. “The cons of locker searches are the mistrust students might feel for the administrators and the searches, even with the best intentions, can be mistaken as a invasion of privacy because students might keep personal photographs or bad report cards within the lockers”(Hartman 1). Another con of locker searches is the time consumed before and after these searches. Before a locker search policy is administered, the school needs to bring the cause of the suspicions to the school board or discuss with parents and sent notices for students and teachers about the new policy in placed; in simpler terms, locker searches can be issued in private. Another con of locker searches is the disagreements between the school’s administration and the student and parent. In other words, if the student and parent feel the search is unjust, the parents or student can press charges against the school which leads to a lengthy, costly battle. But most of the time, courts may be more lenient toward the school instead of the student because the school always sent out search notices beforehand for the potential of the locker searches. Also, schools states explicitly in student handbooks or guidelines that locker searches
The American Library Association also says that books are usually banned with the best intent and to protect people from difficult situations (Brunner). There is a week that celebrates banned books called Banned Books Week. This week was established in 1982 in forms of events and exhibits surrounding censorship (Leigh). Banned Books Week celebrates readers everywhere to encourage us to pick up a book that has been questioned (Hub). There are many reasons why school administrators should not ban books the students are
Do you feel that students' lockers should be checked by the school? Well they should for a variety of reasons ranging from prevention of gun violence at schools, to minimalizing the spread of drugs on school property. Lockers have been home to guns and drugs for the past decades, and if locker searches became a practice, the weapons and drugs found in lockers could be seized before any harm is done. Drugs are distributed around high schools in masses by the day. Students have been caught buying and selling drugs, but that only skims the surface of the number of drugs stored in students' lockers.
Do you think lockers should be in classrooms or hallways? Having lockers in the hallway may seem foolish to some, but there are numerous reasons why lockers in the hallway will benefit students. High school and middle schools should have lockers in the hallways, instead of in classrooms. To begin, lockers should be put in hallways because, in some schools, space in classrooms are limited. For example, in California space is limited as well (Director of Loss Control).
Various components can be considered when describing a great backpack. However, the ideal backpack must be suitable in supporting different groups of people such as, students, travelers, and professionals. Allow me to further describe qualities that make-up a great backpack. An outstanding backpack for students is capable of protecting all their belongings regardless of its weight or the outside weather.
Many people argue that by using laptops during lectures, students are able to actively participate in the class and they have better communication with the professors despite large class sizes (Fried, 2008, p.2). Through classroom resources such as university and course online platforms, students are able to access the information they are learning about in their lectures. However, students themselves also have a very particular view on this topic, as they are very protective over their belongings and do not want to have their laptops banned from the classroom: “more and more faculty are banning laptops from their classrooms because of perceptions that they distract students and detract from learning,” (Fried, 2008, p.1). Prohibiting the use of laptops in university classrooms is becoming a more common solution to multitasking and student distraction. Universities enforce this regulation in order to prevent distraction and multitasking from impacting a students and surrounding student’s academic
The development of technology in this country has been significant to the daily lives of Americans today. In the twenty-first century, one of the greatest accomplishments of technology is the use of laptops. People, such as students, are facing the fact that laptops have made their lives easier. Some colleges and universities have allowed that each student bring their personal laptops with internet connectivity to class while others believe they easily weaken the learning abilities of students instead of promoting and increasing learning in the classroom. Although personal laptops in the classroom have numerous advantages, there have also been frequent complaints from professors because laptops hinder with learning, and as a result should be banned from bringing them into the classroom since laptops can easily distract students, not every student can afford purchasing a laptop, and would prevent students from cheating or plagiarizing.