Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept essay effects of spanking on children
Discipline children with spankings
Parent influence on child development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concept essay effects of spanking on children
Are parents these days being too soft on their children? As with any argument there are at least two side to this, many believe that in the past parents were too harsh in punishing their children. Their belief is that children will learn with some time in the corner and no cookie after dinner. On the counter stance, people believe we were too easy with discipline in the past and we are slowly getting softer and softer resulting in worse behaving. According to modern media and modern culture, harsher punishment of our children is frowned upon and in many cases is looked on in anger by others. What many choose to ignore is that it is the parents job to teach children how to act and their values, and outside of abuse, should be able to use …show more content…
Narvaez suggests that children who are spanked over time become more and more aggressive. Now there is no way to prove this research without conducting the experiment or gathering the information. Dr. Jared Pingleton on the other hand says “Disciplining our sons and daughters is part of the tough work of parenting, but it will pay big dividends in the long run.” Dr. Narvaez chooses to only look at the extreme cases of a parent choosing a more physical punishment, what she fails to see is that spanking shows kids that our actions have consequences. As Dr. Pingleton says “Spanking, then, can be one effective discipline option among several in a parents’ tool chest as they seek to steer their children away from negative behaviors and guide them toward ultimately becoming responsible, healthy, happy adults.” When used correctly, spanking helps children understand that when they misbehave then something bad will come. Based on Dr. Narvaez’s research children will respond better in the long run when parents are feared as well as …show more content…
A reason this could be is that, in earlier generations the whole policy was “Children should be seen not heard,” and as the kids grew up into stable, well adjusted adults, they raised their kids in a more “loving” manner. The problem with this is it made the kids see their parents more as friends than authority figures, resulting in less obedient, and more sensitive children. Those children now growing into more sensitive adults. “Many parents try to raise their child in a way that they wish their parents had parented them. It sounds nice on paper, but it just doesn’t work. So if your parents were distant or rigid with you, or they seemed uncaring to you or they seemed self-involved to you or they made horrible personal mistakes and didn’t give you the guidance you needed, you shouldn’t overcompensate for that by violating parent-child boundaries with your own child. This can be characterized as a “reaction formation.” In reaction to deficits you saw in your own parents, you form a way of parenting that’s not healthy for you or for your child.” This article specifically outlines the problems with being your child’s friend rather than being their parent, trying to treat your child like you would treat a peer results in children who are more defiant towards authority figures. When a parent isn’t an authority children and teens never learn that sometimes
The way my friends and colleagues, and generally speaking, members of society are raised can impact them psychologically. Whether it is being put on a pedestal or being the victim of ignorance, experiences shape the attitude of humans. In “How to Land Your Kid in Therapy,” Lori Gottlieb talks about her patients with great childhoods instead of talking about the patients who had bad childhoods. As she listens to her patients, she realizes that the parents did too much for their children, and consequently set them up for failure. Due to overprotection and not much discipline, these children have concerns, unhappiness, and feelings of being lost. When she thinks of all the experiences her patients have had with their parents, she relates it to her experience of
Darcia begins her writing by first defining spanking as “hitting a child on the bottom with an open hand.” She then illustrates situations in which many parents may warrant the need for spanking. She follows with multiple examples of the negative effects of corporal punishment on the developing children ranging from increased aggression in retaliation to lack of trust
Spanking is the most effective form of discipline when a child knows doing something is wrong, but the child does it anyway. A child who is properly disciplined through spanking is being taught how to control her or his impulses and how to deal with all types of authorities in future environments. Parents can control their child’s future
The use of spanking is one of the most controversial parenting practices and also one of the oldest, spanning throughout many generations. Spanking is a discipline method in which a supervising adult deliberately inflicts pain upon a child in response to a child’s unacceptable behaviour. Although spanking exists in nearly every country and family, its expression is heterogeneous. First of all the act of administering a spanking varies between families and cultures. As Gershoff (2002) pointed out, some parents plan when a spanking would be the most effective discipline whereas some parents spank impulsively (Holden, 2002). Parents also differ in their moods when delivering this controversial punishment, some parents are livid and others try and be loving and reason with the child. Another source of variation is the fact that spanking is often paired with other parenting behaviours such as, scolding, yelling, or perhaps raging and subsequently reasoning. A third source of variation concerns parental characteristics. Darling and Steinberg (1993) distinguished between the content of parental acts and the style in which it was administered (Holden, 2002). With all this variation researchers cannot definitively isolate the singular effects of spanking.
Yet, a study shows that 50 years of data from more than 160,000 children being spanked as a child is the cause of behavior issues and mental illness (Rollins , 2016). Which is the number one reason children resent their parents and have low self-esteem. Psychologist believes that spanking can do harm to the child if the parent has a history of physical abuse or domestic violent. Parenting is determined by a variety of factor, their age, education level, and social background ( Gershoff, Anasari, Purtell & Sexton,
Overpowering sternness leads may lead to a rebellious child, while passive parenting may lead children to inept for the challenges of adulthood. Parenting requires more than teaching children submissiveness, or building of self-importance. Children learn best from a role model who is admirable. Parenting is a great opportunity to set the course of one’s entire life in the right direction.
During Diana Baumrind’s research as a developmental psychologist, she concluded that parents fall under three different styles of parenting: Authoritarian, Permissive, and Authoritative. Baumrind’s styles were based on how one disciplines and nurtures their child (Cherry, n.d., p. 1). Authoritarian parents make discipline the highest priority when raising their children. They do not see any grey area about discipline (Belsky, 2013, p. 205). Rules, and enforcement of rules, are never left up to discussion. Whatever the parent says must go and the child is expected to fully comply. The standards they have set must be lived up to without any exceptions (Cherry, n.d., p. 1). Because the parents are not focused on the child’s emotional needs the parents are often viewed as not very warm and loving (Belsky, 2013, p.205). Permissive parenting is the antithesis of Authoritarian parents. Belsky (2013) stated that permissive parents do not lay down strict rules or discipline. There are not high expectations of how a child should behave or perform. The parents focus is not on rules or reprimanding, but on the child’s own wants and happiness. The parents’ main focus is on nurturing the child’s emotional needs (p.205). In the Authoritative parenting style there are definitely rules and ideas of how the child should behave, but the parents take a more diplomatic approach to parenting. Nothing is ever set in stone and parents negotiate freely with their children about the rules and repercussions. Unlike the Authoritarian style of parenting, these parents have a balance of “both nurturing” and discipline. Parents still have expectations about their children, but understand that they ...
Spanking has a positive effect on children Child discipline is a topic that draws from a wide range of interested fields, such as parenting, the professional practice of behavior analysis, developmental psychology, social work, and various religious perspectives. In recent years, advances in the understanding of attachment parenting have provided a new background of theoretical understanding and advanced clinical and practical understanding of the effectiveness and outcome of parenting methods. Spanking is a type of corporal punishment involving the act of striking the buttocks of another person to cause physical pain, generally with an open hand. More severe forms of spanking, such as switching, paddling, belting, caning, whipping,
Family coercion theory explains that when spanking occurs in a child’s early years the spanking or caregivers physical discipline becomes escalated over time when attuning to their child’s negative behavior. When children express negative behaviors it maximizes the risk of physical abuse to occur. Caregivers report that the cause of the abuse began with what was thought of as “normal” child discipline due to the misbehavior from the child (Lee, Gorgan-Kaylor, & Berger, 2014). Sadly the link between spanking and parental child abuse is shockingly similar. Both include the acts of hitting and the intentions to hurt or startle the children.
In the United States, spanking is known to be one of the most widely used practices for disciplining preschool-aged children. It has been recorded that at least 94% of 3 to 4 year olds have been spanked at least once during the past year. Spanking a child before the age of 2 is identified with the likelihood of having serious behavioral problems after they start school, about 4 years later (Slade, 2004). Because spanking is considered so detrimental, it is known to cause aggression. Many of studies using different data research continues to build a strong case that spanking is harmful to children and is associated with children’s greater aggressive behavior (Lee, 2015).
“Although some permissive parents truly believe that this style of raising a child is the best, yet many others lack confidence in their ability to influence their child’s behavior and are ineffective in running their households” (Impact of parenting styles on child development). Both parents and children lack responsibility. Children with
Spanking immediately reduces defiance when used as opposed to time-out or removal from the situation. It is imperative that a parent is calm and collected when enforcing correct behavior and utilizing corporal punishment as a disciplinary means rather than resorting to yelling at a child which is the leading cause of psychological and social issues (Bartowski, 266-67). “Many scholars have linked frequent yelling to higher recorded rates of antisocial behavior, lower levels of self-esteem, and psychopathology in children” (Bartowski, 266) as opposed to spanking. The phrase “Just wait until your father gets home” strikes fear into the hearts of all children, as it should. Dr. James Dobson, a family psychologist, and Christian author reiterates this by stating that when disciplining “whatever the approach, the child should find it unpleasant and adversive” (Dobson, 232).
Their style of parenting should be set from an early age in attempt to set the rules and regulations to their child to make sure they follow through
Children will cope with the negative comments rather than listening to any positive comments. Parents have to demonstrate their acknowledgement but it also be based on cultures (Yaman et al. 2010). Western families are a culture that shows to be authoritarian parenting style because that is the way they have been taught (Yaman et al.
With parents obsessively controlling their children, the children are essentially unable to mature. Firstly, overly protective parents, for example, almost always do everything for their children; some even do their homework for them. They often take major decisions for their children, such as which university to attend and what field of study to major in. Consequently, the children never get a say in such matters, as they were not raised to make the slightest decisions for themselves. As such, they will not be able to make future judgments on their own without the input from and the consent of their parents. Secondly, the excessive interference of parents into their children’s daily lives over time makes children completely unable to handle their own responsibility. It creates a feeling of lack of control and low self-esteem from the fear of failure, resulting in them resisting any kind of responsibility. For instance, children lose all sense of self-management as they grow up, since they were always instructed what to do with their time. (Scottsdale). Therefore, these children grow up to become completely non-independent, unreliable and irresponsible