Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup Summary

820 Words2 Pages

Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup In the documentary, Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup by Dylan Avery, he discusses the well-known attack on 9/11 of the twin towers. However, the director also analyses the lesser discussed attack on the Pentagon, the world trade center 7 building, and the plane that crashed at Shanksville Pennsylvania. Avery argues that American citizens should not be so fast to decide the attack was conducted by Osama Bin Laden and a few Islamic terrorists, without first examining all the existing evidence that argues otherwise. Additionally, Avery argues that Bin Laden and the other radical Islamic terrorists associated with the attack were just pawns and that there could have been a more organized execution of the violence that day. Throughout the duration of the documentary, Dylan Avery narrates and analyzes each attack …show more content…

Dylan Avery uses Dr. Steven E. Jones credentials, a Ph.D. in Physics, Bachelor in science, and principal Moun-Catalyzed investigator, to support his claim that the collapse of both the twin towers and the world trade center 7 have to have been controlled demolition. Avery states there is no possible way that skyscrapers can just freefall into its self without first taking out the lower structures. NIST's report on the collapse of the towers does not actually contain a description of how the towers collapse and claims there was no signs of controlled demolition, although they didn’t test for explosive residue. However, this is where Steven E. Jones plays a part in the circumstance, he examined dust samples. While examining the dust residue, Jones found the elements, oxygen, iron, and aluminum, which are elements that give off an explosive force when heated. By using Jones’s credential in his documentary, Avery is providing the audience with an authority figure who has the expertise to talk about this topic since he has done research and experimental

Open Document