More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on resurrection in new testament
Essay on resurrection in new testament
Essay on resurrection in new testament
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One of the most perplexing events in the ministry of Jesus Christ is His resurrection from the dead. Many skeptics look at it as made up stories or hallucinations, or mass hysteria, yet the biblical accounts and other evidences point to another conclusion. This research paper will explore three pieces of evidence that the resurrection story is factual and can be accepted as a historical event.
The first evidence for Jesus’ resurrection: the stone was rolled away and the tomb was empty. .John (20:1) reports that Mary Magdalene came early to the tomb “and saw the stone taken away from the tomb.” This was a large, round stone placed in a groove in front of the tomb to secure it from grave robbers. It would have taken several strong men to
John goes into more detail concerning the grave clothes than the other gospels do. In telling the story, John uses three different Greek words meaning “to see.” When John first arrived at the tomb, he stooped and looked in and saw the linen wrappings lying there, but he didn’t go in (John 20:5). He uses the common Greek word that suggests nothing more than sight. But when Peter got there, he entered the tomb and saw the linen wrappings (John 20:6). Here the Greek word has the nuance of looking carefully or examining something. We get our word theater from it. Audiences at a theater watch carefully so as not to miss any part of the play. Finally, John went in, saw, and believed (John 20:8). Here John uses a word that means to see with understanding. Jewish burials involved wrapping the corpse with linen strips and tucking spices into the folds to offset the stench of the corpse. The head was wrapped separately. Peter and John saw the linen wrappings with the face cloth rolled up by itself in an orderly manner, but Jesus’ body was gone. Grave robbers would not have taken the time to remove the grave clothes at the scene, but would have grabbed the body with the grave clothes and left. Or, if they had removed them, they would have left them scattered in a disorderly fashion. D. A. Carson (The Gospel According to John [Eerdmans/Apollos], pp. 637-638) observes, “The description is powerful and vivid, not the sort of thing that would have been dreamed up; and the fact that two men saw it (v. 8) makes their evidence admissible in a Jewish court (Dt. 19:15).” When Jesus raised Lazarus, he was raised in his old body, which was still subject to disease and death. So Lazarus couldn’t pass through the grave clothes, but had to be unbound by bystanders (John 11:44). But Jesus was raised with a resurrection body that is no longer subject to death. That new body is physical yet could pass through the grave
The Shroud of Turin is probably one of the most unusual, profound, studied artifacts in the world. The Shroud is a linen cloth that contains the image of what appears to be a crucified man. Many people have speculated that it is the burial cloth of Jesus, while others speculate that it is an artistic painting. Over the years many test and studies have been conducted to prove once and for all if the Shroud of Turin is authentic or fake. Let’s look at different perspectives and outcomes of the testing and you decide for yourself what you think to be true.
The stones that sealed tombs were normally heavier than a ton and because of its weight it could only be moved by a force of several strong men. It could not have been moved by the woman who visited it, or a large group of everyday men (the disciples). Also an official government seal was placed over it. Not only would it have been impossible to remove the stone and steal the body, but illegal. In Luke 24:2, it even says the women found the stone moved away, and could not have moved it.
Resurrection men were a group of individuals in England that provided fresh bodies for the anatomists and medical schools as they requested them. Doctors and medical students in the late 18th century were just scratching the surface about understanding how the human body functions, and they needed bodies to dissect to gain a better understanding. At the time, doctors were legally only allowed four to six bodies of
Then came the soldiers, and brake the legs of the first, and of the other which was crucified with him. But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they did not brake his legs: But one of the soldiers with a spear, pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water. (The Holy Bible, John. 19:32-34)
It is known to most that the gospels often differ from historical facts due to the writer of each gospel putting significant emphasis on particular actions and attributes of Jesus. Also a major part in this difference is the fact that the gospels were written 35-60 years after the death of Jesus and some of these memories have altered over time. Differences in conflicting evidence, writing to different communities, writing during a different time period, and with different intentions are all more reasons as to why these gospels conflict with historical facts. There is said to be six accounts that are subdivided into two separate traditions. These two traditions are those having to do with the appearance of Jesus in Galilee and the others are the appearances of Jesus to the eleven disciples in Jerusalem. These two traditions seem to not have any knowledge of one another and when the two were attempted to be combined into one tradition it was proven that this is not only impossible but it is unbeneficial.
Meaning, the followers of Jesus were taken up, and the remains were of the unsaved individuals.
Hall, Gerald. "Jesus' Crucifixon and Death." Academics' Web Pages. School of Theology at McAuley Campus. Web. 26 Feb. 2012.
Jesus, a name known by billions throughout the world. To each, this name means something different; savior, friend, philosopher, prophet, teacher, fraud, fake, liar. Some even believe that He is just an imaginary character from the minds of those who wrote about Him. The Westminster Dictionary of Theology describes apologetics as, "Defense, by argument, of Christian belief against external criticism or against other worldly views" (Apologetics 31-32). Though there are still many mysteries that surround the ongoing debate about Christianity, evidence can now prove some of what Christians took by faith before. Now, more than ever, there is information to prove the existence of this man that walked the earth more than two thousand years ago. Little remains of His life and works except for that which is contained within the pages of the Holy Bible. Throughout the past century alone, there have been numerous discoveries, both scientific and archeological; to further prove the existence of a man called Jesus and reinforce the Bible as a legitimate historical document. The validity of Christianity and Jesus Christ himself has been the center of religious controversy for centuries. Though His identity has not and probably never will be proven, He did exist. This paper will use apologetics to prove this so. Sufficient evidence proves the existence of Jesus and forms a firm basis for Christianity.
In this first section of the pericope, John draws attention to the fact that Lazarus had “been in the tomb for four days” (v. 17). Because Lazarus has been dead for so many days, this portion of the text is important because Origen indicates that there was a Jewish belief that “the soul hovered nearby the body” of a deceased person for three days, and this meant that an individual could be revived up until the third day. However, after four days, the person was thought to be irrevocably dead. As Moloney points out, Lazarus’ body would also have been “in an advance stage of decay.”
What do all Christians and most Atheists, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and almost every other religious sect have in common? They know the story of Jesus’ crucifixion. The story itself is fairly simple: Man is killed on a cross, man is buried in a tomb, and (according to Christians) man becomes alive again. Regardless of individual beliefs, researchers have been investigating a specific part of the story since almost the Middle Ages: the shroud Jesus was wrapped in. Scientists have been split over whether this could possibly prove the existence of Jesus or whether it was faked for religious reasons. Despite the theory that the Turin Shroud is a hoax created during the Middle Ages, it can be proven that initial carbon dating was incorrect and the way the shroud portrayed Jesus’ wounds were accurate to how crucifixions occurred, rather than what is portrayed in the media, proving that it is real.
Traditionally, the resurrection of Jesus Christ has been thought to be true. However, the modern debate amongst many theologians has been whether the resurrection is truly a fact, or just a legend created over the past hundreds of years. There are four different Gospel accounts and two other books in the bible which seem to tell the story of the resurrection as a central truth. There are also many historians which use the resurrection to support arguments and expand their literary works. The resurrection could be thought of as the foundation of Christianity. Without the truth of the resurrection, many pieces of the Christian religion seem to fall apart. There are three main known facts which are used to support the Resurrection. The tomb which was found empty, the physical appearance of Jesus to many witnesses, and the formation of the Christian religion all point towards the traditional theory. To interpret these facts, theologians use the process of inference till reaching an explanation. This means that, in order to understand the facts left
Introduction Unique among the religions of the world, Christianity boldly attributes its underpinning to a historical event—the resurrection of Jesus—rather than unsubstantiated acceptance. In an early letter written to Christians in Corinth, the apostle Paul ostensibly encourages cross-examination, challenging recipients to assess the veracity of Jesus’ resurrection, while discouraging acceptance of Christianity based on fictitious reports (1 Corinthians 15:12-20). Throughout the discourse, Paul conveys the ramifications of a fabricated resurrection, declaring that without the resurrection there is no basis for Christianity (v.14, 17, 19), the teachings of the apostles are chimerical (v.15), and Christians should be “pitied more than anyone” (v.19). With the legitimacy of Christianity hinging upon the resurrection, opponents routinely challenge the event, attempting to discredit this historicity of the accounts, and/or offering alternative explanations.
According to the Bible, after the death of Jesus on the cross, the body was taken by Joseph of Arimathea and wrapped it in linen c...
From the women we learn that Jesus rose on the first day of the week. From the other disciples, we learn that Jesus rose on the third day. If the resurrection of Jesus was nothing but a hoax or urban legend, there would not be an identifiable starting point. This is not the case for the resurrection. We know the location he was buried and the time span in which it happened.
After watching the debate between Professor Licona and Professor Martin, I have come to the conclusion that Jesus rose from the grave on the third day and that this is proven by not only theological theories, but also by historical facts. As Licona says, this is extremely crucial to the Gospel in every way. If Jesus didn’t really rise from the grave, it makes Jesus a false prophet and disproves Christianity; making our faith worthless (1 Corinthians 15). This would be disastrous for the world considering 32 percent of the world population profess to following Christ. In order to prove Christ’s resurrection Licona separates his argument into two parts: Facts and Methods.