Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The motherland russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The motherland russia
There would be no more elections for three years, until the Parliamentary elections of 1999. With the 1998 Russian Financial Crisis and given his old age, it was time for Yeltsin to go. His health had been an issue for years, but he had not been ready to name a successor. Prior to the election, Yeltsin fired his entire cabinet and two prime ministers, eventually landing on Vladimir Putin, who was relatively unknown at the time. After Putin swiftly shut down the Chechen terrorist attack and proclaimed that “Russian Army will chase down the terrorists”, his popularity exploded. In just one year he went from a 2% to 56% approval rate. Yeltsin promptly named Putin as his successor. [Treisman 02/24/14] This election cycle saw the rise of two new major Parties of Power, Unity (Putin’s Party) and Fatherland All Russia. Once again, thanks to continued economic struggles, the Communist Party won 25% of the seats. Unity came in 2nd, and Fatherland came in 3rd. Yabloko and LDP were not major parties in this cycle. Soon after the election, Yeltsin resigned from the Presidency at the end of 1999, making Putin president and calling for an election in three months’ time. [Treisman 02/24/14] In the 2000 President election, Putin beat Zyuganov by a large margin—53% to 30%, thanks largely to Putin’s recent popularity and his incumbency advantage. Yavlinsky and Zhirinovsky were non-factors in this election, coming in a distant 3rd and 4th. Putin’s quick response to the Second Chechen War showed him as a fearless leader that the Russian people respected and trusted to lead the nation into the new century.
By 2003, Putin and Unity had become the strongest political force in the short history of Russia’s political system. Thanks to three years of a ra...
... middle of paper ...
...ntury, a more liberal and progressive-minded social culture present in Russia, and international conflicts such as the ones in Chechnya, Georgia, and currently in Ukraine. During Yeltsin’s term, new parties sprung up each election, some as alliances and some as brand new parties. Since Putin’s first election, the Unity Party has dominated the political scene of Russia, but they do not have the staggering majorities they did in the previous decade. Still, it is difficult to predict what the course will be for Russia’s future elections. Will Putin and Unity continue to dominate, or will a new opposition party be able to take Putin out of power? Though the current situation makes it look like Putin is here to stay, we’ve seen that all it takes is a little bit of time for the sentiments of the Russian people to dramatically change.
Works Cited
The Economist, Treisman
...oved to be singularly influential and daunting. This is, perhaps, the greatest obstacles to achieving true democracy in Russia—the authoritarian and repressive traditions that refuse to die out with the passage of time.
The Effect of the Bolshevik Rule on Russian Culture Bolshevik cultural policy was based on spreading their values to the population. They attempted to promote equality to create a classless society. In addition to removing class differences they attempted to give equal status to women and to young people. In order to encourage women to work state funded crèches were established and laws passed to give women parity in terms of pay with men. The state tried to destroy the old concept of families by legalising abortion and enabling people to obtain divorces much more simply.
Throughout history there have been many odd characters. Russian history was not excluded. Grigory Rasputin, who was an assistant to the Royal Russian family, was an unusual man.
The Impact of Stalin on Russia and the Russian People By 1929, Stalin had become the sole leader of Russia. He said, "We are between 50 and 100 years behind the West. We must make this difference in 10 years or go under." He wanted things to change in Russia quickly and so he brought up the five year plans, which were to modernise the Russian economy.
The Romanov Rule in Russia The Romanovs had ruled Russia since 1613. When the last tsar of all,
The Slavophile and westernizer conflict is an inherent cultural question that Russians must answer about their country. Russian thinkers have long been fragmented between the Westernizer and the Slavophile viewpoint. Both disagreed about the true nature of the country as well as its relation with the West. It is a problem that has plagued Russia for centuries, and continues to do so to this day. Adopting the mindset of recognizing this conflict is essential to better understanding Russian history as well as the motives and thought processes of Russian leaders today.
Julie A. Cassiday, Emily D. Johnson, “Putin, Putiniana and the Question of a Post-Soviet Cult of Personality,” The Slavonic and Eastern European Review 88 (2010): 680-707.
At 7:32 p.m. December 25, 1991, the Soviet flag was lowered from the Kremlin in Moscow for the last time and replaced with the pre-revolutionary Russian flag, which symbolized the disintegration of Soviet Union. Early in the day, the last president of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, resigned his post, and Boris Yeltsin became the president of the newly independent Russian state. With the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the campaign between the Soviet Union and the United States ended. Nonetheless, although the end of the Cold War makes people around the world enter a peaceful time, until now both people in the past and historians are amazed why the previous powerful Soviet Union collapsed suddenly. Thereby, the cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union is still an everlasting and popular topic in the world.
Stalin’s initial economic impact on Russia was greatly significant as he introduced a number of 5-year-plans that improved the steel and coal industry and provided more jobs. Industrialisation was needed in the USSR, and Stalin turned a mostly backward, illiterate society into a major power in just a few years . Many workers at the time would have seen Stalin as a significant figure due to his plans and actions to modernise Russia as this meant more jobs would be available and they can be more self sufficient as a nation. This support was important, as many farmers across Russia disagreed with Stalin’s ideas, so he relied on the support of workers. Alexander Nove states that if the goal was to modernise and industrialise Russia, then Stalinism
Vladimir Putin first gained power in the year 1999 when Russian President Boris Yeltsin named him Prime Minister. Putin was then elected President of Russia in the year 2000, only to be reelected again in 2004. By 2008, he stepped down and served as Prime Minister once again only to be reelected as President in 2012. In all of his years of rule, Vladimir Putin proved himself to be a successful leader of Russia due to his economic policies, effective military reforms, and treatment of his people.
Dmitri Shostakovich was one of the most celebrated composers of the 20th century. He achieved fame, but with much hardship along the way. He was censored and threatened with not only his life but that of his wife and children by playing the role of a public figure in Soviet Russia. The question is was he a committed communist or a victim? The events in his life, good or bad, shaped the music that he created and led to one of the greatest symphonies of the 20th century, his Fifth Symphony.
International politics as one may imagine includes foreign affairs. This is why the topic and focus of this paper revolves around the current event within Eastern Europe. It will focus on both Russia, Ukraine, and the world, and from it, it will be analyzed by using the resources provided within class. After all it is a International Politics course, and one of the best ways to effectively put the skills and knowledge to use is to focus on an event or current event. The paper will attempt to go over in a chronological order of the events that has happened, and what is happening currently over in Ukraine. Afterwards, an analyzed input will be implemented providing reasoning behind Russia's actions, and actions of the world, and potentially some solutions.
The Effects of Stalin on Russia Much like Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin was one of the most ruthless and despised people in the recorded history of the world. Stalin, though, found it fit to abuse his people in any way he saw fit. This man started what history now calls "The Great Purge. " Through the late 1920's when the rest of the world was living it up as the roaring 20's came to an end, Joseph Stalin was setting the stage for gaining absolute power by employing secret police repression against opposing political and social elements within his own Communist Party and throughout society.
69 years after Joseph Stalin facilitated the creation of the Soviet Union in 1922, Mikhail Gorbachev played a part in its collapse, resigning from office the day before it officially fell on Christmas Day. Both leaders had an enormous effect on Soviet Russia and the welfare of its state and citizens. Stalin was a communist, who continued and supported the single party state founded by his predecessor Vladimir Lenin. Gorbachev, even though he was originally a member of the Communist Party, worked against the Marxist ideals implemented by Stalin and Lenin and worked to reform Russia to a more open society. Despite the obvious differences in ideologies and varying levels of success in office, both leaders left
The Russo-Chechen war that ended in 1996 should have given the Russian government a feel of things to come when they decided to attack in late September of last year. Triggered by security challenges to the State, Russia decided that the democracy would be in danger if they didn’t act. Russia was in a politically unstable situation right now with the resignation of Yeltsin, and the current Presidential elections looming. Also looming on the political horizon was the concern over rampant corruption in the government. If they had done nothing Yeltsin’s party would have stood to lose, yet Putin, (Yeltsin’s successor) succeeded in focusing the medias attention on the war rather that the domestic corruption.