The United States Constitution stands as a bedrock document that has guided the nation since its inception. Crafted during the hot summer of 1787 in Philadelphia, it replaced the ineffectual Articles of Confederation, which had left the young nation in a state of disarray.
The Constitutional Convention brought together some of the brightest minds of the time to deliberate on how to create a more perfect union. One of the pivotal documents that shaped the Constitution was the Virginia Plan, presented by James Madison.
Table of Contents
Historical Context of the Virginia Plan
To understand the Virginia Plan fully, it is crucial to first grasp the historical context in which it was conceived. The period following the American Revolutionary War was characterized by a fragile and disjointed confederation of states. The Articles of Confederation, ratified in 1781, were the nation’s first attempt at governance. However, they proved ineffective in several critical ways.
Weak central authority: Under the Articles of Confederation, the central government was powerless to tax, raise an army, or regulate commerce effectively. It relied on the states for revenue and resources, leading to fiscal instability.
Lack of unity: The Confederation was more a league of sovereign states than a true nation. Each state had its own laws, currencies, and economic policies, creating economic disarray and disputes among the states.
Inadequate representation: The Confederation Congress had no executive branch, and decisions required the approval of nine out of thirteen states, making it difficult to pass significant legislation or amendments.
Economic turmoil: The lack of a stable currency and trade barriers between states contributed to economic hardships, causing financial crises and trade disputes.
Shays’ Rebellion: In 1786, Daniel Shays led a rebellion in Massachusetts to protest heavy taxes and foreclosure policies. The inability of the central government to quell the rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the Confederation.
These issues led many prominent figures, including George Washington, to call for a convention to address the deficiencies of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention, also known as the Philadelphia Convention, was convened in May 1787 with the goal of drafting a new constitution.
Edmund Randolph, the Governor of Virginia at the time, actually introduced the plan to the Constitutional Convention on Madison’s behalf. Madison’s role was primarily that of the plan’s main architect and drafter.
The Virginia Plan: An Ambitious Blueprint
The Virginia Plan was presented by James Madison, often hailed as the “Father of the Constitution,” on May 29, 1787. Madison was a brilliant political thinker and a staunch advocate for a strong, centralized government. His plan was one of the most influential proposals put forth during the Constitutional Convention. Below are the various resolutions outlined in the Virginia Plan.
A strong government: The plan called for a government consisting of three branches—the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Bicameral legislature: The Virginia Plan called for a bicameral legislature consisting of a lower house and an upper house. Representation in both houses would be determined by population, a radical departure from the equal state representation under the Articles of Confederation.
Proportional representation: Perhaps the most contentious aspect of the Virginia Plan was its proposal for representation in the national legislature. States with larger populations would have more representatives, giving them more influence in the new government. Smaller states, fearing the dominance of larger ones, were initially opposed to this idea.
National legislature: Overall, the Virginia Plan aimed to establish a national legislature with the authority to levy taxes, regulate commerce, and maintain a standing army—all powers that were lacking under the Articles of Confederation.
Executive branch: The plan proposed the creation of a single executive, or president, who would serve a four-year term and be eligible for reelection.
Powers of the executive branch: The executive branch would have the authority to veto legislative acts and command the military. It would also have the authority to execute and enforce the laws passed by the legislature.
Impeachment: The executive could be impeached by the national legislature.
Judiciary: The judiciary was to consist of one or more national courts with judges appointed by the national legislature.
National judiciary: A national judiciary branch was also included, with judges appointed for life. This branch would have the power to strike down state laws that were deemed unconstitutional. The national judiciary had the power to adjudicate cases involving national laws and disputes between states.
Council of revision: The plan included a council of revision, consisting of the executive and a subset of the national judiciary, with the authority to veto legislative acts.
Legislative power: The plan proposed that the national government should have the power to legislate in all cases where the individual states were “incompetent.”
Individual states vs. the national government: The national government had the power to use force against states that did not comply with national laws.
Checks and balances: It provided for a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
New Jersey Plan vs. Virginia Plan: A Counterproposal
The Virginia Plan’s call for proportional representation in the national legislature immediately sparked debate and opposition from smaller states. In response, the New Jersey Plan was presented by William Paterson on June 15, 1787. This plan sought to amend the Articles of Confederation rather than replace them entirely through the below restricting provisions:
Unicameral legislature: The New Jersey Plan proposed a unicameral legislature in which each state would have equal representation, just as in the Articles of Confederation.
Limited executive power: The plan also called for an executive committee rather than a single president, and the executive would have limited powers, primarily concerned with foreign affairs.
Continuation of weak central government: Unlike the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan did not grant the central government the authority to tax or regulate commerce extensively.
The debate between the New Jersey Plan and Virginia Plan shed light on the fundamental question facing the Constitutional Convention of 1787: Should the new government be based on equal state sovereignty or proportional representation based on population? This debate threatened to derail the entire process.
The discussions and debates during the Constitutional Convention were conducted under strict confidentiality. This confidentiality ensured that delegates could express their views openly without fear of public or political repercussions, allowing for a more candid and honest debate.
The Great Compromise: Resolving the Conflict
As the Convention progressed, it became clear that a compromise was necessary to move forward. Enter Roger Sherman of Connecticut, who proposed what would become known as the Great Compromise or the Connecticut Compromise, with the following points of agreement:
Bicameral legislature: The Great Compromise retained the idea of a bicameral legislature but combined elements of both the Virginia and New Jersey Plans. The lower house, the House of Representatives, would have proportional representation based on population, satisfying the larger states. The upper house, the Senate, would provide equal representation for each state, addressing the concerns of the smaller states.
Executive branch: The compromise also maintained the creation of a single executive, the president, as proposed in the Virginia Plan. The executive’s powers and duties were specified, including the veto power.
National judiciary: The plan retained the concept of a national judiciary with judges appointed for life.
The Great Compromise marked a turning point in the Convention, allowing the delegates to find common ground and move forward with the drafting of the Constitution. It bridged the gap between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan and set the stage for the creation of a strong, federal government with checks and balances.
Legacy and Significance of the Virginia Plan
The Virginia Plan, although not adopted in its entirety, left a profound mark on the United States Constitution and the structure of the American government. Its significance can be seen in several key aspects:
Federalism: The compromise between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan resulted in a federal system of government, where power is divided between the national government and state governments. This system has been a defining feature of American governance.
Checks and balances: The Constitution, heavily influenced by the Virginia Plan, established a system of checks and balances among the three branches of government—executive, legislature, and judiciary. This system prevents any one branch from dominating the others.
Ratification: The Virginia Plan and the debates surrounding it played a significant role in the ratification process. The Federalist Papers, authored by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, defended the Constitution and explained its principles to the American people.
The Virginia Plan, presented by James Madison during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, was a bold and visionary proposal that laid the groundwork for the United States Constitution. While not adopted in its entirety, many of its key elements were incorporated into the final document, shaping the structure of American government for generations to come.
The Virginia Plan FAQs
-
What was the Virginia Plan?
The Virginia Plan was a proposed framework for a new United States government. It called for a strong federal government, where representation in both houses would be based on population, a single executive with veto power, and a judiciary.
-
What is the Constitutional Convention?
The Constitutional Convention of 1787, also known as the Philadelphia Convention, was a pivotal gathering of delegates from the 13 American states to draft a new constitution to replace the ineffective Articles of Confederation. The convention aimed to address the nation's governance problems, ultimately resulting in the creation of the United States Constitution, which established the framework for the federal government and the principles of American democracy that continue to shape the nation's governance today.
