Evolution In Lord Of The Flies Analysis

1171 Words3 Pages

Evolution in Disguise
Many people wonder what would happen if a person was left alone in the wilderness to rely on instincts to survive. William Golding wrote Lord of the Flies to tell a story about his perspective on that question. Throughout the book, the children change into what some might describe as savage like. However, this is not the case. The children are alone, having to rely on human nature to survive. Therefore, their genetics and natural instincts take over their mindsets. In Lord of the Flies, Golding uses symbolism and characterization of Ralph and Jack to show that humans are incapable of inversion because they just evolve. The symbolic contrast between the conch and the spear show evidence of evolution. At the beginning …show more content…

In their hometown, the children are used to having an adult in charge and who calls on kids to talk, so they see the conch as this adult authority. This is shown when all of the kids start to claim the statement “’I 've got the conch’” (71) in order to claim authority at the time. Ralph is associated with the conch, and the both become the symbol of democracy and order as that of back home. “The conch shell…stands for a society of laws in which, for example, people take their turn in speaking,” (“Themes and Construction: Lord of the Flies”). Some people argue that the children begin to revert back to savage ways of authority and structure, but they are actually evolving into a new form of rule that works better in this environment. Democracy is not effective because Ralph is trying to turn this island into what is comfortable and normal for him. The power begins to shift from the conch to the spear when the children start to realize that the way of the spear works more efficiently. The spear represents the hunt and acts of savagery. Jack uses the spear to try …show more content…

Throughout the story, Ralph remains constant. This means that he does not evolve as the other boys do, for he tries to keep order and maintain traditions and habits of England. He believes that they “’ought to have a chief to decide things.’” (15) He views this situation as just a bridge they have to cross, and in order to cross it, organization needs to be put into place by a leader. Ralph is organized and responsible, but he thinks that all the other boys think believe in his way of thinking. “Several boys in the group emerge as leaders. Ralph is a smart, handsome boy with a good grasp of morality. Jack is another potential leader but one who prefers fun and excitement over societal ethics” ("Lord of the Flies."). The other boys originally follow what is familiar, which is represented by Ralph, “’him with the shell,’” (15). However, they eventually fall under Jack’s leadership when they see that he is having more fun. Ralph does not evolve as Jack does, for he still cares for other human beings and maintains the same values he used to possess. The reader sees clear evidence of this when Ralph tells Piggy, “’That was murder.’” (139) Ralph is the only child who is willing to admit they just brutally murdered one of their friends. However, Ralph maintains his responsible trait throughout the whole novel, for when the officer states, “’who’s boss here?’” Ralph replies, “’I am,’”

Open Document