Critical Analysis Of 'Why We Keep Playing The Lottery'

1637 Words4 Pages

“Why We Keep Playing the Lottery”, by freelance journalist Adam Piore takes a very in depth look as to what drives millions of Americans to continually play the lottery when their chances of winning are virtually non-existent. He believes that because the odds of winning the lottery are so small that Americans lose the ability to conceptualize how unlikely it is that they are going to win, and therefore the risk of playing has less to do with the outcome, and more to do with hope that they are feeling when they decide to play. It 's essentially, "a game where reason and logic are rendered obsolete, and hope and dreams are on sale." (Piore 700) He also states that many Americans would rather play the lottery thinking ,"boy, I could win $100 million" (705) as opposed to thinking about all of the money they could lose over time.

Throughout his essay Piore backs his claim with evidence provided by …show more content…

Prior to reading about this study I had always thought that richer people played the lottery much more than those with less money. I always just assumed that because the rich had a lot of money that they just played for the heck of it and could afford to spend hundreds of dollars on purchasing tickets. But after the conclusion of their experiment proved otherwise I was pretty shocked., and after reading why it was that poorer people actually spent more on tickets it made so much more sense and I was able to see exactly why that was.

In his essay Piore also mentions "the near miss" effect and how it also drives Americans to want to continue playing and playing. "Many players experience 'the near miss, ' which creates the illusion that they came close to winning a multimillion dollar jackpot. Most players don 't realize, however, that "near miss" is an illusion. The odds of winning get worse with each successive match."

Open Document