What 's So Special About Another Earth?

756 Words2 Pages

In relatively modern science, there have been multiple discoveries of extrasolar planets which are also known as exoplanets. These specific planets are classified for orbiting a star outside our solar system, other than the Sun. In these findings, scientists claim to uncover the secrets within these uncharted areas to determine its compatibility to Earth conditions. Even within our own solar system, Mars has been a popular controversial topic of whether it would be able to sustain life. Even with doubts, many scientists still claim to believe life might’ve been supported on the planet a long time ago. Why are scientists so stubborn to cling to the possibility of discovering another Earth-like planet that can support life? In Lisa Messeri’s article “What’s So Special About Another Earth?” from the August 25, 2016 The New York Times, she incorporates astronomical diction as well as ethos proficiently throughout her article to examine why we’re so insistent on finding another Earth-like planet even when the odds aren’t in its favor.
From the start of her article, Messeri establishes a more scientific vocabulary which stays fluent throughout the rest of the article. With the use of words like “goldilocks” and “red dwarfs”, Messeri assumes her audience is well enough educated in astronomy to understand these terms to be able to bring up bigger questions and contemplate larger issues. Although Messeri’s article is meant to reach more knowledgeable readers, with the use of astronomical diction the way she incorporates it into her argument as well as inserting examples of history such as “ the 2009 launch of Kepler, a space telescope dedicated to finding exoplanets,” she unintentionally isolates some of her readers that aren’t aware of th...

... middle of paper ...

...lity but with more diversity in how to apply her ideas with different techniques and devices other than just strained with ethos, Messeri’s argument could have been more compelling.
In more theoretical situations such as Messeri’s argument on the persistence of exploration for another Earth, setting up a strong skeleton for the article with solid credibility is the first step on convincing the audience toward Messeri’s claims. With no solid solution to the posed argument, her incorporation of astronomically appropriate diction helps reinforce her expertise on the subject on hand and why we should listen to what is being said. Although not all components within the article were strong enough to support such such a controversial topic, Messeri was able to adequately get her perspective across with reason on why we, humans, search so intently on finding a sister planet.

Open Document