Difference Between The Virginia Plan And New Jersey Plan

2233 Words5 Pages

Our National government has gone through a lot of changes since it was first created in 1781. The Articles of Confederation was created as the nations first national constitution, however it lacked certain powers and ultimately wouldn’t survive. However delegates from the thirteen states were determined to amend the articles, so our government would survive and flourish. The problem was that there was a problem between two proposed plans, the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan leaned larger states with larger populations and the New Jersey Plan didn’t favor either side, just wanted equality among the states. At the Constitutional Convention, these issues were discussed and debated until they ultimately found a solution, which would be called the Great Compromise. This Compromise saved our constitutional government and saved the states from becoming their own separate governments. Parts from all these plans were used to …show more content…

In this system the Legislature would elect more than one-person to serve in the executive branch and the executive branch would elect the Supreme Court Justices. The main difference between the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan was that the New Jersey Plan proposed a unicameral legislature, which consisted of one parliamentary chamber (Boundless). This meant that each state would have one vote, like the articles, and would feature the same number of representatives so all states would be equal. The plan also presented that congress would have the power to regulate trade and impose taxes, like the Virginia plan. Congress would also have control to pass any law they please and the states would have to comply (Carey). Ultimately both plans had their own ideas and had their own differences but there couldn’t be two plans so they had to think of a compromise, and luckily someone

Open Document