Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The cause of conflict between Israel and Palestine
The cause of conflict between Israel and Palestine
The cause of conflict between Israel and Palestine
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The cause of conflict between Israel and Palestine
After the Second World War, the US and UN should have taken the pre-violence prevention measures to prevent the deadly growth of the conflict but instead, US sort of took position with Israel at the early stage, this was one of the great spoilers that prolonged the conflict. This can be seen in the US use of veto power in the UN Security Council in favour of Israel’s actions in the Palestine territory which includes major parts of Jerusalem.
In the light of these, the US foundational basis for mediation in the conflict took the path of “COERCION” against Palestine which is why one can only speak of little success (at least a cease fire) situation in the conflict today.
Two states solution have been discussed by Saudi Arabia and US leaders in 2002. In 2007 poll in Gaza Strip and West Bank, 46.7% responded in favour of two state solution and 26.5% for a binational (having two nations under one government) state. In November 2007, Israel, Palestine Liberation Organization and the US agreed on a tow state solution as the new basis for negotiations.
Coercion and Hard Mediation Analysis
The prolonged peace talks and the failed outcomes, partly depended on the individuals in power, over the years of the conflict, the goals of the US in the issue and the Middle East as a whole was to contain, democratize and liberalize the region. This sort of affected the mediation role of the US; thus leading to hard mediation measures which could be seen during President Bush’s administration.
In the light of this, when President Barack Obama came into power, in his June 2009 speech, it was clear that a new US goal towards the conflict has been set out on a neutral ground. US gradually became more and more like a “dialogue conflict resolution med...
... middle of paper ...
... political societies of the Middle East. And these are problems explained by the World System Theory which divides the world into CORE, SEMI-PERIPHERY and PERIPHERY countries. In the light of these, the countries in these region must accept one another before the spirit of coexistence spread.
Despite the fact that Israel took advantage of the conflict and the US unconditional support and went on to steal US’s nuclear information, US did not get furious over this. This because, more to religion and ties, US considers Israel as a strategic partner through which it can actualize some of its goals in the region, just as Turkey is also strategically important to the US. This strategic partnership helped US to get involve in the Iraq (Saddam Hussein’s regime) and Iran’s assumed nuclear weapon building.
John Ikenberry’s article “The Future of the Liberal World Order”, examines the past, present, and future of the liberal world order; he informs the reader of his thoughts and opinions on its current state. Ikenberry is very adamant in his position, and he does invoke some good arguments overall, but in the end he falls short. He is a neoliberal institutionalist, therefore his view is needless to say optimistic. His view and the article are both outdated. Since the publication of his article in 2011
Involvement in the Suez Crisis Eleven years after the second world war, a crisis occurred which had the potential to escalate into a third world war. Hostilities ran high and the background causes that prompted this crisis contained the same fundamentals as were seen in the first and second world wars. Those being militarism, alliances, imperialism and nationalism; wrought by those countries that had an interest in the Suez Canal and the Arab states. In the world of superpowers in conflict, Canada made
are applied to the West European cold peace after the Second World War. The transition of cold war in 1950s to cold peace was due to the emergence of realist mechanisms where the United States (US) pacifying role as the hegemon and the common threat produced from the Soviet Union to the US and Western Europe. The combined effects of hegemony and balance of power produced the cold peace between the key rivals France and West Germany after the World War Two in 1950-1954. The initial caused of conflict
enjoyed a rather healthy relationship with Middle East nations during the 19th and beginning of the 20th century. Possibly, this was due to the fact that the US had little or no interest in colonizing countries in the region. On the contrary, it largely participated in philanthropic and educational activities therefore attracting positive perception among the Middle East people. However, after the world war II the situation begun to change. The US, after fully appreciating the strategic value of the
The relations between the U.S and the Middle East are strained at best. The troops deployed in the area face constant threat of attack by a militant group. These broken relations between the U.S and the Middle East started over 50 years ago, with the Iran Hostage Crisis. Root causes of the crisis were many. One was U.S greed over oil in Iran. The second, the coup in Iran organized and funded by the CIA. The U.S dependence on foreign oil is another cause of the problems. Lastly, should the U.S stop
The Yom Kippur War took place in 1973 between Israel and the Arabs furthermore the 2 superpowers played subtle roles in this event . Israel won the war however with a higher cost then any previous wars . While the war did not conclude in an Arab military victory, both the Egyptian and Syrian armies had regained their honour and prestige(1). The War of Yom Kippur suprised the world in the means that it showed that the Arabs were a force to be reconed with. In summasation the war paved the way for
The Role of Religion in Foreign Policy In order to best understand the role of religion in foreign policy, one needs to acknowledge that religion does play a role in foreign policy. However, the role religion plays in international relations is often overlooked. This omission of such an important factor that influences international politics in so many ways and on so many levels is detrimental and should be addressed (Fox, 2001:73). Religion influences international politics in varied ways
bargaining power for Egypt in relation to Israel in the region, foreign capital for its new economic initiatives, and regional independence. While Sadat succeeded in achieving some of these goals with the accords, others he did not. I will examine the years leading up to, during, and after the Camp David accords, and how internal and external pressures pushed Sadat to accept that particular course on which he set Egypt. In particular, I will examine superpower relations, Egypt’s economic circumstances
SINCE THE END OF WORLD WAR II, A ROMANTICISED ‘SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP’ between the United States and Britain has been referenced on countless occasions in speeches, books, and essays by academics and statesmen on both sides of the Atlantic. The relationship has multiple definitions, with no precise doctrine or formal agreement that outlines its tenets, and has been apparent in a myriad of interactions between the two countries. It is visibly apparent culturally as the United States evolved from
the latter goal that would set Nasser on a collision course with the West, initially Great Britain and to a lesser extent France, but eventually the United States. As such, Nasser’s commitment to autonomy would make him a hero to many in the Arab World and a villain to the West. Accordingly, for the next sixteen years Nasser and the United States would forge a strained relationship that at times bordered on mutual hostility and on other occasions, would stop just short of friendship based on pragmatic
The Middle East has come along way since the rise of civilization thousands of years ago. Civilization emerged in the Middle East and northeast Africa along the river systems as agricultural societies grew in population and developed new forms of social organization. For the last two thousands years the west has been drawn to the middle east fascinated by the culture, religion, resources and politics. The Middle East has an immense impact on the world globally. My goal in this paper is to explain
The concept of “identity” in a person’s life often emanates from systemized sense of social representations and relations. Actors in the identity criterion have a sense of belonging characterized by a capacity of self-reflection, entailing a process that constantly reaffirms one’s status and differentiation from others. Identity produces consciousness of action and becomes formalized, with symbolic character and recognition found within specific limitations that are confined in a particular environment
New Historicism, expose the stasis and uncaring state many of the characters appear to be in as a result of the great war. Psychoanalytical Criticism explains certain human behaviors shown by the characters of this novel: especially Nick Carraway, whose time in the war clearly affected him as he is unable to return to his life after. New Historicism shows how the trauma of the war affected American society through the desolation of the previously glorified ideal of the American dream. This deconstruction
predominate theory in International Relations called the Democratic Peace theory. It states that democratic states rarely, if ever, engage in conflict with one another. In a 1988 study by Jake Levy, a political science professor at Rutgers University, entitled “The Democratic Peace Hypothesis: From Description to Explanation” he states that, “this absence of war between democracies comes as close to anything we have to an empirical law in international relations” (Levy, 1988). Although Levy believes
Israel According to the US-based Failed States Index (FSI), Israel ranks number 67 and is in greater danger of becoming a failed state than the likes of Congo, Cuba and Jordan. Despite Israel’s booming economy, high life expectancy and low unemployment, part of the explanation for its low FSI ranking is the West Bank. According to the Fund for Peace’s methodology, Israel/West Bank is considered one entity when determining its Failed States Index score. The issues Israel/ West Bank scored highest