The United States Interaction with the International Court of Justice Over Consular Rights: How Our Refusal to Obey Is Impacting Foreign Nationals and American Citizens On January 9, 2003, Mexico initiated proceedings before the International Court of Justice against the United States of America concerning the alleged violations of Articles 5 and 36 of the Vienna Convention; basically, claiming that the United States is not honoring the consular rights of foreign nationals within the United States

When we speak or hear about the law of God or the Ten Commandments, love is usually the last thing that comes to our minds. We tend to picture large stones and towering inscriptions laid out before us, written by the hand of an angry God, a Just Judge. We see the bold words “THOU SHALT NOT” and cower in fear. We tend to correlate the law of the big ten with the halls of justice, cold, insensitive, exacting, condemning. We see them devoid of all emotion, warmth, endearment, understanding, forgiveness

Americans are called to obey police officers as figures with authority. However, as we have seen in the news recently, police brutality is a common occurrence. People are starting to question police authority and whether or not they should have to obey at all times, even to the point of physical harm. Similarly, Aquinas and Augustine deem there are times in which it is acceptable to disobey earthly authorities, most notably when violating the divine law, however, Augustine disagrees with Aquinas

by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion,” meaning that it does not matter who the army is made up of, just who they are under the direction of. Odysseus is the lion of this epic, and his men are the sheep, and if the sheep do not obey the lion, they are unbeneficial and misguided. And of course, if the group disobeys the orders from the leader, things will not go well for them. An army is only as good as its leader, when it follows the instructions of said leader, and this is made

There are many instances in Plato's the Crito where Socrates gives reasons for himself to stay in Athens and face his death. Arguments range from that of him being too old to run, to the common response two wrongs don't make a right. The reason I intend to argue against is one Socrates expresses in regards to his obligations to the city he has lived in all his life, and thus the rules that he has subsequently followed throughout that time. In Athens just like any other city, one follows the rules

A Free Society Must Expect Civil Disobedience Are we morally obliged to obey even unjust laws? Think about what this means. This means that laws, regardless of how unfair, unjust, or immoral they may be, must be followed with no better reason that they are the law. To the thesis that we are obliged to obey even unjust laws, I will argue that the standard objections to Civil Disobedience, given by Singer, are incorrect To begin, however, I believe it is necessary to define an "unjust"

days this was considered normal, therefore women had no choice but to obey and do as they were told. In Hamlet, Shakespeare portrays a similar relationship between women and men. He allows men to hold the higher position in the causing, them to treat women as lesser people and believed that women should listen to them and do as they were told. 	Ophelia a young women in Hamlet, she represents how women are treated. Ophelia obeys several different men in the play. One of the men is Hamlet. Ophelia

worshiping only God. God is the creator of all that exists. The great commandment clearly states, "The Lord is our God, the Lord alone! Therefore you shall love the lord, your God, will all your strength." (Deuteronomy 6:4-5) God states that if the people obey and follow him, they undoubtedly will "flourish and live forever." (Deuteronomy 5:29) Similar to His covenant with Abraham, God promises fulfillment to those who live a life of righteousness and moral. God describes the blessings he would bestow upon

not from a single entity such as the king. Power that comes from such sources is usually referred to as naked power. In such a scenario, we cannot totally agree that the Horatii were comfortable with the title as champions. They might be indulged to obey the state because they ought to, or because they are afraid of the consequences. In contrast, they might be honoured to be chosen as champions of Rome and this title might influence them into offering their lives on behalf of the country. On the viewer’s

Socrates has been accused of corrupting the youth by Meletus and has been sentenced to death. He has thoroughly justified his own decision to obey the opinions of the majority and serve out the sentence that his own city has deemed appropriate for his crimes. At the beginning of this piece, Socrates has presented a period of questions and answers through dialogue with Crito. Throughout the dialogue Socrates is explaining his reasoning for not evading the government. Crito does not understand the