The Dark Side of Judge Pyncheon in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Novel, The House of the Seven Gables People in society live in a masquerade. Everyone wears a decoratively adorned mask that displays beauty, purity, and service. However, behind the mask lies on the inside of all society. One will stop at nothing in order to be well liked, thus becoming hypocrites. In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel, The House of the Seven Gables, the narrator uses intense diction, a vivid selection of detail, and a shocking
towards their community. Judge Pyncheon examples this belief, even though some select few are able to truly see the character within. Nathaniel Hawthorne reveals the character of Judge Pyncheon in his novel The House of The Seven Gables through his grammatical choices, syntax and diction, as well as the attentiveness to details to showcase the misleading facade that the Judge parades. Through Hawthorne’s grammatical choices the audience learns the truth behind the actions the Judge has taken throughout
In the excerpt from Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel The House of the Seven Gables. Hawthorne reveals character, Judge Pyncheon through a list of great qualities. In the excerpt, these qualities are labeled “splendid rubbish”. The phrase establishes that Hawthorne doesn’t think that the qualities are that great. He starts the section of the excerpt off by saying how the Judge has many great qualities such as the “purity of his judicial character”, “his faithfulness in public service,” “remarkable zeal
of Seven Gables, reveals Judge Pyncheon’s character in a strategic manner to show the shallowness in Judge Pyncheon’s good deeds. The author uses the position of details, diction, and tone to express his dislike for Judge Pyncheon’s character and also to reveal the judges character as two-fold, first good, then evil. Nathaniel Hawthorne strategically reveals Judge Pyncheon’s seemingly good side to the reader in order to show how “fake” Pyncheon really is. Judge Pyncheon is a man of “eminent respectability”
Ever since the start of using courts, the main goal of it was to deliver a fair environment where the accused could defend themselves and show the jurors that he/ she did not commit the crime that they were accused of. Sometimes this system fails us and they sentence an innocent man to jail for something they didn’t commit. The activity that I observed in the field of criminal justice was I went to the boulder court house and watched one of the cases that’s was happening that day. As I sat there
It was as if, in one afternoon, the civics and law classes had seen Ottawa in its entirety. The May 15 field trip to the main courthouses was astounding thanks to the numerous experiences that I was able to come home with. The main unforgettable experiences were—without a doubt—the mock trial at the Supreme Court, the defence lawyer, Gary Barnes, and the exhilarating cases in the Superior Court of Justice. Each one of these events, although equally as entertaining, contributed to my experience in
worked for a newspaper company. John was tried for speaking against the government and making people stand by his side for he said that his criticisms were true. For the government to avoid this he created what we call today a jury system to help the judge figure if he was guilty or innocent. Most of the time the jury is wrong because most cases they don't have enough evidence to put the defendant in prison so most of the time the jury will say he or she is innocent. In (Doc B) it states that most of
While appointing a federal or Supreme court judge, the main question is do you focus on the merit or diversity aspect. Diversity can offer a variety of different views in the perspective of the case; however, merit can assure us with that the admirable decision will be made off of worthy evidence. Throughout this essay, the different perspectives will be addressed whether merit or diversity is the superior opinion when appointing a federal or supreme court judge. We will explore the meanings behind merit
The jury system in the United States has served the country well for a long time, but it should not decide cases for the justice system in the future. While on the outside it may seem to be an efficient system, the truth is that it possesses a number of flaws that makes it unfit for the justice system. Reginald Rose’s short story, Twelve Angry Men, displays the problems with this system through the jury of a boy accused of murdering his own father. As the jurors discussed about the boy’s outcome
In Re Henley 478 S.E.2d 134 (Ga. 1996) For this case, there was a violation of Standard 30 of Bar Rule 4-102(d) involving an attorney’s representation of a client in which the attorney has a financial/personal interest which may reasonably affect his professional judgement. The client is a close friend of the attorney and does not object to the attorney’s conduct. The client’s relationship to the attorney and lack of reaction to the attorney’s actions are not mitigating factors. Under the circumstances
Published by UC Berkley School of law. A Judge received a public reprimand for “friending” an attorney during a trail. This case was an interesting case, at first the thought of a judge becoming friends with an attorney did not spark any form of controversy in my mind at first. Yet, the text presents us with norms in terms of conduct. These norms are Independence, Impartiality, Integrity, and accountability. Regarding this case, which ethical conducts did the judge violated? Independence of the court
Thomas D. Morgan wrote “Inverted Thinking about Law as a Profession or Business” from Journal of The Professional Lawyer. The purpose of this article is to discuss whether the practice of law should be seen as a business or profession. This article lays out the differences in meaning to business and profession as it applies to the practice. It also assesses the type of work lawyers do and the personal characteristics involved to practice. The author supports his ideas as well as his argument, by
Good Morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I am honored to represent my client Mr. Winston Smith in the case of Winston vs Oceania. You have heard the prosecution’s case claiming that my client is a criminal and deserves to be where he is, and that my client willingly broke Oceanic law. However, I will prove that not only is my client not a criminal, but instead a hero. Exhibit A I am holding in front of you, your garden variety notepad harmless right yet this item was enough to start the process
television, and how it really is in the real world. Based on what I have seen on television I can picture an arrangement occurs in a good size room where it’s a big room where half the room is where the public can sit, and the other half consist of the judge, the prosecutors next to the defendant leaving a gap between them, and on the side is where the jury sits.Yet today when I when to go see one in person what I saw was not what I expected. Today I enter criminal court building located on 100th centre
To most, the job of the defendant is usually seen as being far more easy in comparison to the prosecution’s side. This is because of the famous phrase: “innocent until proven guilty”. The idea that the defendant’s job is easier is put to the test in a play that is named Inherit the Wind by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The defendant, Henry Drummond, has to defend Bert Cates. A man that has broken a strictly enforced law in Hillsboro, and a man that everyone knows is guilty of breaking the law
I stand firmly AGAINST the resolution which states that jury nullification ought to be used in the face of perceived injustice. (Optional) I would like to offer another another definition for the following term from The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Jury nullification: The acquitting of a defendant by a jury in disregard of the judge's instructions and contrary to the jury's findings of fact My value for this debate is fairness because it is such a large part of our legal system. My value criterion
The judge, with one word, can decide the fate of the defendant. Whether or not they actually are guilty or not. Back then, when new races were introduced and “ accepted” into America, people were bias against those people just for those races. A grand example is in the book To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee, with many people, black or white, having unfair trials for several reasons based on being racist, being afraid, and being unequal in society. To begin, justice in Maycomb is against other
Introduction For the purposes of this assignment, I attended the court on three separate occasions. On February 15 and March 1, 2018, I had an opportunity to observe the criminal trial of R v Bullen. On March 2, 2018, I observed a criminal trial of R v D. D. R v Bullen In R v Bullen, the accused David Bullen, was charged with the drug trafficking and organized crime as a result of the police project Adelaide. This was a very lengthy and complex trial, involving offences committed across Ontario
The Australian Court System The Australian court system is structured as a hierarchy, meaning that some courts have more power than others. In this hierarchy there are two sections of courts; the state courts such as the supreme court, county court, court of appeal, magistrates court and specialised courts like children’s court for example and tribunals like VCAT all of these are set up under state legislation. The second section being federal courts such as the High court which comes under commonwealth
page there is a comment with the caption, “We, the jury, find the defendant to be as guilty as he looks” (Doc E). It seems far more of a danger that a judge should be operating under that principle. If a judge were to rule in these ways that would just be that and the defendant would have to appeal in order to change whatever wrongful decision this judge made. This wastes the defendant’s money, tax payer money, and everyone’s time, not mentioning the intensely disruptive nature that ruling would have