Henry Ii Essays

  • Henry Ii Of England

    1217 Words  | 3 Pages

    C.     Education D.     Marriage II.     Reign A.     Early difficulty B.     King’s personality C.     Government policies D.     Thomas Becket III.     Death A.     Achievements B.     Sons revolt C.     Successor Henry II Henry II was the first of eight Plantagenet kings. He neither ignored his island kingdom nor dragged it into continental trouble. Along with Alfred, Edward I, and Elizabeth I, Henry II ranks as one of the best British monarchs. Henry II was born in Le Mans, France in 1133

  • Reigns of Henry II

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    Reigns of Henry II Henry II, one of the Angevin kings, was one of the most effective of all England's monarchs. He came to the throne amid the anarchy of Stephen's reign and promptly collared his errant barons. He refined Norman government and created a capable, self-standing bureaucracy. His energy was equaled only by his ambition and intelligence. Henry survived many wars, rebellions, and controversy to successfully rule one of the Middle Ages' most powerful kingdoms. Henry was crowned

  • Henry II Quotes

    516 Words  | 2 Pages

    Henry II was known as one of England’s greatest kings. Along with being king of England, he was also Count of Anjou, Duke of Aquitaine, Duke of Gascony, Duke of Normandy, Count of Nantes, Lord of Ireland, and controlled little bits of Western France and Scotland. He was most famous for his legal administrative systems, his long disputes with the Church, and his dramatic turmoil with his family. One of his greatest quotes was, “Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?” Henry II was born on

  • Thomas Becket vs Henry II

    2285 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thomas Becket vs Henry II The High Middle Ages was a time of power struggles between the Church and the State. Increases in royal power and expeditions like the Crusades symbolized the teeter-totter of the balance of power between the two foundations, and a prime example of the fight for power is the conflict of Henry II, King of England, and Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury. Henry II gained his throne thanks to the efforts of his mother, who fought to maintain her family's stature

  • Comparing King Henry II And Thomas Becket

    631 Words  | 2 Pages

    traits impressed King Henry II, who appointed Becket chancellor of England. Becket immediately began to use his skills in the service of the king by becoming Henry’s trusted advisor. He made the kings power stronger throughout the land by controlling the King's secretariat, raising money for the King's wars, accompanying the King's armies, and conducting diplomatic negotiations. In this work, the two became close friends. When the Canterbury archbishop Theobald died, Henry forced Becket to become

  • Biography of Henry II, King of England

    1276 Words  | 3 Pages

    Henry II was born in 1133, and died at 56 years old, in 1189. When he was only 2 years old, his grandfather Henry I, appointed his cousin Stephen to the throne, instead of Matilda, who would be rightfully eligible to the throne. Matilda was not found suitable, firstly because of her gender (in a sexist society), and secondly because she was married to a rival of the Norms, Geoffrey of Anjou. Born in Anjou, to Geoffrey of Anjou, (Plantagenet), the most powerful Duque of Central France, and Matilda

  • Conflict Between Church and Government Involving Thomas Becket and Henry II

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, and the other Henry VIII. In 1162, Henry II, king of England, appointed Thomas Becket, as Archbishop of Canterbury. This was the most important religious position in England. No-one was surprised by Henry’s choice as both he and Thomas were very good friends. They enjoyed hunting, playing jokes and socialising together. Becket was known to be a lover of wine and a good horse rider. Henry II loved to ride as well but his personality was troubled by his

  • The Influence Of Henry The II And Eleanor Relationship In France

    970 Words  | 2 Pages

    Henry at just 19 years old and Eleanor of Aquitaine being thirty and strong pheaded, they eloped to be one of the most powerful and effective political relationships. Though these people are very different, this relation worked for so many reasons, and fell apart as well. Henry the II was a very powerful leader and one of the greatest English monarchs to date, but his wife Eleanor, who also was very powerful, had a definite affect on his rule and a lasting affect on France. If not for each other

  • St. Henry II Research Paper

    504 Words  | 2 Pages

    St.Henry II was born in Albach, Hildesheim, Germany, 973. His feast day is July 13. This is the story of a man who became a holy emperor and was a wise ruler. He led and defended the Holy Roman Empire and he promoted peace in Europe so war wouldn’t come upon them. St. Henry is known as the patron saint of the childless and lame. He was the last of the Ottonian Empire. Henry was the son of Gisela and Henry II, Duke of Bavaria. Henry studied at the cathedral school, and was a devout, religious man

  • Comedy in I Henry IV and II Henry IV by William Shakespeare

    2529 Words  | 6 Pages

    Comedy in I Henry IV and II Henry IV In I Henry IV and II Henry IV, William Shakespeare brings together drama and comedy to create two of the most compelling history plays ever written. Many of Shakespeare's other works are nearly absolute in their adherence to either the comic or tragic traditions, but in the two Henry IV plays Shakespeare combines comedy and drama in ways that seem to bring a certain realism to his characters, and thus the plays. The present essay is an examination of the

  • King Henry II Symbolism Essay

    1050 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moreover, Shakespeare utilizes symbolism in Henry IV, Part 1 to foreshadow the play and to guarantee that the Prince of Wales will shine like the sun and start a new era and become the new king like he was destined to be. However, Henry IV considers Hal not fit for court and Hal needs to change his mind by battling with his father in the Battle of Shrewsbury. Symbolism is constantly

  • Comparing Development of the King in Richard II, Richard III, Henry IV, Henry V

    2224 Words  | 5 Pages

    Shakespeare’s Development of the King in Richard II, Richard III, Henry IV, Henry V Shakespeare's plays beginning with Richard II and concluding with Henry V presents an interesting look at the role of a king. England's search for "the mirror of all Christian kings" provided the opportunity to explore the many facets of kingship showing the strengths and weaknesses of both the position and the men who filled that position. Through careful examination, Shakespeare develops the "king" as a physical

  • Comparing the Defective Rulers in Henry IV and Richard II

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    Defective Rulers in Henry IV and Richard II It has been shown again and again throughout history and literature that if there is a perfect human he is not also the perfect ruler.  Those traits which we hold as good, such as the following of some sort of moral code, interfere with the necessity of detachment in a ruler.  In both Henry IV and Richard II, Shakespeare explores what properties must be present in a good ruler.  Those who are imperfect morally, who take into account only self-interest

  • Analysis Of Prince Hal And Falstaff's Henry IV: Part II

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most famous scenes in Henry IV: Part I is the scene in which Prince Hal and Falstaff put on a play extempore. This is often cited as the most famous scene because it is Hal’s turning point in the play. However, the scene is much more than that. The play extempore is a moment of prophecy, not epiphany because is cues the reader in to the play’s major themes, and allows readers to explore the possibilities of the play’s continuance. In his speech at the end of 1.2, Hal says that he is only

  • A Comparison of Corrupt Kings in Shakespeare's Henry IV and Richard II

    1134 Words  | 3 Pages

    A successful monarchy relies upon a stable leader who is concerned with the satisfaction of those he rules over. Henry Bolingbroke the IV in Shakespeare's Henry the IV Part I follows a trend set by his predecessor in Richard II of self-indulgence and neglect of his kingdom. These leaders worry about the possibility of losing their kingdom or their soldiers to other nobles who were also concerned more with obtaining a higher position rather than governing. The king must also be wary of his own life

  • Comparing the Humility of Kings in Shakespeare's Richard II through Henry V

    2383 Words  | 5 Pages

    Richard II through Henry V Though Shakespeare was a conservative, he believed in the humility of Kings. The plays Richard II through Henry V assert Shakespeare's idea that a King must understand the common man to be a good ruler. These four plays chronicle the history of three Kings' ability to recognize, relate to, and be part of the humanity he rules. Shakespeare advocates his belief with the falling of Richard II, who could not or would not understand his subjects; the constancy of Henry IV,

  • Comparing the Murder of the King in Hamlet, Richard II, Henry VIII, Macbeth and Julius Caesar

    2789 Words  | 6 Pages

    Murder of the King in Hamlet, Richard II, Henry VIII, Macbeth and Julius Caesar Kings are everywhere in Shakespeare, from Hamlet to Richard the Second, from Henry the Eighth to Macbeth; many of the plays contain a central element of a king or autocratic head of state such as Julius Caesar, for example. They focus more specifically on the nature of that person's power, especially on the question of removing it; what it means on both a political and psychological level, how it can be achieved

  • Essay On Betrayal In Henry IV And Richard II

    1233 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shakespeare displays betrayal throughout Henry IV and Richard II. Betrayal affects both kings but affects their reign differently. The Unabridged Dictionary defines betrayal as, "to deliver or expose to an enemy by treachery or disloyalty...to disappoint the hopes or expectations of; be disloyal to" (n.d.). People handle betrayal in different ways, and this occurs with these two kings. King Henry IV was a stronger king than Richard II because he was capable of handling betrayal and was able to hold

  • The Middle Ages From 1066 To 1485

    1462 Words  | 3 Pages

    start of the Crusades and the knights of the Middle Ages, including the founding of the Knights Templar. The Domesday Book and the Magna Carta. The Kings and Queens of the Middle Ages including Richard the Lionheart and great Plantagenet Kings from Henry II (1154-1189) to Edward III (1327-1377). The Hundred Years War between England and France. The Medieval Kings and Queens of the Royal Houses of Lancaster and York and the Wars of the Roses. The Middle Ages Feudal System and the terrible Black Death

  • Comparing King Richard II And King Henry IV

    793 Words  | 2 Pages

    King Richard II and King Henry IV both share similar qualities in being a ruler. They both share the qualities of the Divine right of kings. It all come does down to power with each of them. They believe that they were selected by the Lord to become ruler of their people. I believe King Henry IV is a better ruler because he is not as power hungry as King Richard II. Throughout the play King Richard II illustrates the privilege of sanctity of a person. According to our notes the sanctity of a person