Studies on Storage of MLX-NLC and Possible Toxicity

1018 Words3 Pages

MLX-NLC gel stored at different temperature and humidity conditions (Table 1) were evaluated for any changes in particle size, PI, zeta potential, and drug content at 30, 60, 90 days time points to assess the effect of storage conditions on the stability as a function of time.
The particle size was monitored at regular time intervals during storage to assess particle aggregation. The nanoparticles are thermodynamically unstable system and for their stability, a zeta potential value between –30 mV and –60 mV is desirable to avoid aggregation of particles (Muller et al., 2000). Thus, zeta potential measurement gives us the assessment of the storage stability of nanoparticles. In addition, Tween 80 could improve the stability of the system due to its steric effect that increases the repulsion between particles and prevents their aggregation (Lim and Kim 2002). Stability of MLX-NLC gel was evaluated in terms of their MLX entrapment efficiency. Log (E.E %) was plotted against time and the slopes (m) were calculated by linear regression. The slopes (m) were then substituted into the following equation for the determination of k values: k "= m × 2.303"
Shelf life values (the time for 10% loss, i.e. t90) were then calculated by the following equation: t90 "= 0.105/k"
In case of MLX-NLC gel, no significant (p>0.05) change of particle size, PI, zeta potential, drug entrapment efficiency was observed at 4±2°C over the period of 90 days (Table 3). An increasing trend of particle size and PI, decreasing trend of zeta potential and drug entrapment efficiency were observed with storage time at 25±2°C/60%±5% RH and 40±2°C/75±5% RH. The augmentation of particle size and polydispersity index, and diminution of zeta potential and drug entrapmen...

... middle of paper ...

...itation degree was categorized based on as negligible (PII = 0-0.4), slight (PII = 0.5-1.9), moderate (PII = 2-4.9) or severe (PII = 5-8) irritation (Manosroi et al., 2013). The study indicated that MLX-NLC gel had no significant effect on the animal weights at all time points (P>0.05). MLX-NLC gel showed no erythema or edema on the rabbit skin with PII 0.0. However, 20% SLS treatment resulted in moderate skin irritation with PII value 2.33 and 2.0 after 1h and 24 h, respectively. This established the skin tolerability and safety of MLX-NLC gel for topical application. This could be due to the entrapment of MLX in nanoparticles based gel resulted in prevention of direct contact of drug with the skin and thus prevented the drug related local side effects. Thus, MLX-NLC gel formulation would prove to be highly advantageous for topical use with improved safety profile.

Open Document