Similarities Between Hamlet And Karl Marx

1254 Words3 Pages

The story of Hamlet and the theory of Karl Max, the creator of the Marxist idea, are two ideas that complement each other. From the different social classes between the King, the players and even Hamlet to the way they treat others. Sometimes the public makes the mistake of tying Hamlet and Shakespeare with Communism but this conspiracy is not seen in the book because in it not everyone lives the same but it is understandable that the theory of Marxism is of the problem of having social classes and that in the end, there should not be any. Novels, articles and life can have aspects of this theory but in the end, there will always be a division between social classes and how they represent each other. England’s long history of class divisions …show more content…

At the beginning of the book they are depicted as Hamlet’s friends, companions that will help him get through the craziness and madness that he has, the resent for his stepdad and new King, the lust he has for Ophelia and the tiredness of everyone making a big scene on him grieving his dad, all which are deadly sins and are seen as possessions that should not be allowed because of social norms. “Both your Majesties Might, by the sovereign power you have of us, Put your dread pleasures more into command Than to entreaty” (II, ,ii, 26-30) . Demonstrating how they are going to help the King and Queen even though they are Hamlet’s friend. Then in the middle of the book, they try to still help Hamlet but at the same time they rely on what the King and Queen have to say about the topic and they are very obedient to them. But what is really ironic is that they were there to help Hamlet, now they are just making him do or follow the royalty rules or commands. So who are they must loyal to? Hamlet or the Royalty? In the end, the King is manipulating them when they think they are just helping Hamlet. “, And I boarded them. On the instant, they got clear of ship; so I alone became their prisoner. They have dealt with me like thieves of mercy, but they knew what they did…” (IV, ,vi, 19-21) Here, Hamlet clearly leads …show more content…

From the beginning of the story King Claudius wants to send Hamlet away to England because he is afraid that Hamlet will reveal his secret about him killing the former King and then quickly marrying his mom. Which looks very suspicious on the King’s side of the story. Hamlet is also part of the royalty because, first his mom is the Queen and his dad was the former King, so this makes him next in line for the throne. “Not where he’s eating, but where he’s being eaten… fat king and a skinny beggar are just two dishes at the same meal. That’s all I have to say.” (IV, iii, 21-27) This is said by Hamlet to show the betrayal of Claudius to the former King. He also emphasizes that power means nothing because when he dies, worms, just like anybody else, will eat him. It also demonstrates that betrayal is the root to all problems. Due to the differences they make in their social status, this idea can be seen as Marxist. If they were seen as equal, this would not be happening, Hamlet would forgive the King and the King would be free to do as he pleased without the coming out of the secret. There is also a big deal of greed that they have towards each other because of their relation and how they keep trying to put the other one down, something that in the end they

Open Document