The Oppressive State Of Women In Kate Chopin's The Story Of An Hour

1029 Words3 Pages

Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” is a late nineteenth-century Victorian work that highlights the oppressive state of women. Chopin’s text describes the emotional journey of Louise Mallard upon discovering the death of her husband. Through the uses of streams of consciousness, she reveals her inner thoughts about her new-found freedom as a widow. She discovers that her husband is alive, and she dies from a heart attack. Thus, Chopin uses her text to suggest a need for a critical assessment of the roles of women in society. Chopin, then, deconstructs these traditional ideas and expectations of women and gender roles in the Victorian era.
Jacques Derrida’s literary theory of deconstruction examines how theorist employs texts or ideas to dismantle …show more content…

It is assumed that Louis was subjected to marriage for the sake of economic survival analogous to all Victorian women. She admits that “she had loved him—sometimes. Often she had not.” The social taboo of divorce, and economic dependence keeps Louise in an unhappy marriage. Hence, the death of either Mr. or Mrs. Mallard is the only means of respectable escape for Louise. The demise of their marriage, as a result of death, triggers a sense of rebirth because his death offers “the new spring life”. Thus, Chopin demonstrates that marriage should not be a form of expectation for all women. Chopin intends to deconstruct traditional Victorian beliefs on marriage and …show more content…

She centralizes the text around the subject of women, perceptions and the cultural norms of the aforementioned. Chopin does not mention the race of Mrs. Mallard in “The Story of an Hour”, which can further alter the reader’s perspective of the character in the nineteenth century. Provided that Chopin chose to make Mrs. Mallard into a black woman, the intersection of race and gender could be heavily discussed. Then, critical race theory cannot be applied to this short story. Chopin does not present her text as a form of Marxism where class and class relations are thickly interpreted in terms of the socioeconomic system. Also, her text does not analyze the aftermath of the oppressive actions of the colonial society, which is post-colonial

Open Document