Special Forces Soldiers Used in Book, The Ugly American by William J. Lederer and Eugene Burdick

1337 Words3 Pages

Special Forces soldiers work in foreign lands with situations which are not always completely clear from its beginning. The Special Operation Imperatives serve as the base for success by providing the framework to develop and assist the host nation in achieving their desired goals. Through this essay I will use the novel “The Ugly American” (William J. Lederer & Eugene Burdick) to provide context to the benefits of applying such imperatives and the consequences of improper application. I will bring to light the actions of the characters and depict the reasons why the application of the imperative made the character succeed or fail in his desired goal.
The first character that I will discuss is Honorable Louis Sears, American Ambassador to Sarkhan. He received the Ambassadorship position after his political career ended and the Federal judgeship he was pursuing became open. Sears was as an overweight, ignorant individual who did not care nor had any idea of how to interact with other cultures. Mainly, he lacked understanding of the operational environment in Sarkhan. Proof of the latter was evident once he was told he was going to be Ambassador to Sarkhan and he mentioned that “he did not work well with blacks.”
The above action may not seem critical at the initial stages of an assignment but it clearly demonstrates the importance Sears placed on his assigned area and international affairs. Sears’ disregard in understanding the operational environment became more apparent once he arrived in Sarkhan. He always looked down at Sarkhanese people and was doubtful of their honesty. In one instance, Sears mentioned the Sarkhanese, referring to them as monkeys, “were strange because the women did all the work while the men had all the fu...

... middle of paper ...

...and international support.”(SO Imperatives) The failure of the Ambassador in understanding the implication of the article diminished the credibility and lost popular support among the populous.
A personal example that serves as a good comparison to the attitude of Sears happens more often than not in the Afghanistan area of responsibility. We often see how many individuals may not take the time to understand the culture of the area in which they are operating. I operated in Afghanistan four times around different areas and each area has different set of norms. If an individual does not take the time to understand these differences, misunderstandings are bound to occur. Sharing and interacting with the population is imperative in understanding the people and influencing them. If we look down or ignore the environment we will lose legitimacy in our word and purpose.

Open Document