The Pros And Cons Of Permanency Plans

1395 Words3 Pages

In searching permanency planning within the foster care system articles have shown different outcomes that have created a debate. The permanency plan was implemented in 1997 by Congress under the Adoption and Safe Family Act (ASFA). After a child has been in care for 12month and 12month intervals in a family court hearing is when the courts determine where the child will live permanently. The permanency planning is a judicial proceeding that organizes a way of handling cases by case with the intentions to protect the welfare of the child. The five individual goals are listed below shows options that the foster parent, law guardian, and courts have in planning permanent living arrangement for the child. The five permissible ASFA permanency plans are: • Return to parent • Adoption upon the filing of a petition to terminate parental rights • Referral for legal guardianship • Permanent placement with a fit and willing relative …show more content…

In Family Court there are steps in gaining certainty that the placement of a child is right for him/her. Whether it be non-kinship foster care or kinship foster care the agency will provide understanding to the family in placing the child in a safer environment would be the child best interest. This is determine by Family Court Act article 7 “Person in need of supervision” which concern the child 18 years of age in care. Under the act there are categories to determine if the child brought into care falling into the category of detention, secure detention facility, Non-secure detention facility, Dispositional hearing, or Permanency hearing. Now focusing on permanency hearings, it is define is to review the foster care status of child and permanency plan which is created by the social services official on behalf of the courts (cite

Open Document